Literature DB >> 10155283

Costs of illness in cost-effectiveness analysis. A review of the methodology.

T A Hodgson1.   

Abstract

Costs of illness are an important input in cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). Reviews of the literature have found that many CEAs are of low technical quality and fail to take account of costs of illness appropriately. The costs of illness and disease averted by an intervention, indirect costs, and medical care costs in added years of life are topics that present methodological issues and are not handled consistently in CEAs. Costs of illness and disease averted may be estimated by prevalence- or incidence-based methods; the correct conceptual paradigm depends on the nature of the disease. Incidence costs may be estimated by modelling the disease process, or directly from prevalence costs, the choice being determined by the extent and quality of data available. Regardless of the method, in forward-looking CEAs potential technological change must be taken into account so that incidence-based lifetime costs estimated from current treatment practices will not be biased. Whether to include indirect costs is an important issue, because indirect costs may be large and have a significant impact on the cost-effectiveness ratio. In the pure CEA model, indirect costs are excluded on ethical grounds and to prevent incursion of elements of cost-benefit analysis into CEA. The modified CEA model accepts enhanced productivity as an economic benefit made possible by, but distinct from, the health effect of an intervention. Indirect costs are included when appropriate, depending on the perspective of the analysis, the measure of effectiveness, and who bears the costs. When medical care extends life, expenditures will be incurred in the added years for illness and disease unrelated to the intervention. As with indirect costs, the pure CEA considers unrelated 'downstream' costs an indirect consequence of the health benefit of the intervention and excludes them from CEAs with the societal perspective. The modified CEA treats unrelated downstream costs as an economic effect of the change in health due to the intervention and includes them in order to have a more complete accounting of the cost of the intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 10155283     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199406060-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  37 in total

1.  Principles of cost-effective resource allocation in health care organizations.

Authors:  M C Weinstein
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of hypertension treatment--a review of methodological issues.

Authors:  M Johannesson; B Jönsson
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  National hospital discharge survey: annual summary, 1991.

Authors:  E J Graves
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 13       Date:  1993-07

4.  The lifetime cost of injury.

Authors:  W Max; D P Rice; E J MacKenzie
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.730

5.  Challenges for cost-effectiveness research.

Authors:  M C Weinstein
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1986 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  A review of cost-effectiveness analyses of hypertension treatment.

Authors:  M Johannesson; B Jönsson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Cost-effectiveness of prenatal screening and immunization for hepatitis B virus.

Authors:  J A Arevalo; A E Washington
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-01-15       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Cost-effectiveness league tables: more harm than good?

Authors:  M Drummond; G Torrance; J Mason
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis in health care. Growth and composition of the literature.

Authors:  K E Warner; R C Hutton
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Cost-of-illness methodology: a guide to current practices and procedures.

Authors:  T A Hodgson; M R Meiners
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc       Date:  1982
View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Cost-of-illness studies. Useful for health policy?

Authors:  M A Koopmanschap
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Quality assessment of economic evaluations published in PharmacoEconomics. The first four years (1992 to 1995).

Authors:  M Iskedjian; K Trakas; C A Bradley; A Addis; K Lanctôt; D Kruk; A L Ilersich; T R Einarson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  French economic evaluations of influenza and influenza vaccination.

Authors:  E Levy
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Measuring the externality of antibacterial use from promoting antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Klaus Kaier; Uwe Frank
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Cost-effectiveness of early versus delayed functional restoration for chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Brian R Theodore; Tom G Mayer; Robert J Gatchel
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-06

Review 6.  Economic cost of male erectile dysfunction using a decision analytic model: for a hypothetical managed-care plan of 100,000 members.

Authors:  H L Tan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Clinical issues related to the costs of alcoholism.

Authors:  M O Howard; R W McGuffin; A J Saxon; K L Sloan; R D Walker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  The cost of angina pectoris in Sweden.

Authors:  F Andersson; B Kartman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Assessing the annual economic burden of preventing and treating anogenital human papillomavirus-related disease in the US: analytic framework and review of the literature.

Authors:  Ralph P Insinga; Erik J Dasbach; Elamin H Elbasha
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Direct costs of ankylosing spondylitis and its determinants: an analysis among three European countries.

Authors:  A Boonen; D van der Heijde; R Landewé; F Guillemin; M Rutten-van Mölken; M Dougados; H Mielants; K de Vlam; H van der Tempel; S Boesen; A Spoorenberg; H Schouten; Sj van der Linden
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.