Literature DB >> 21138761

Development of maze navigation by tufted capuchins (Cebus apella).

Jing Pan1, Erica H Kennedy, Tomas Pickering, Charles R Menzel, Brian W Stone, Dorothy M Fragaszy.   

Abstract

Theories of spatial navigation hypothesize that animals use vector or topological information to choose routes, often including detours, to move objects or themselves to goals. We assessed adult capuchin monkeys' (Cebus apella) navigation through 192 virtual two-dimensional mazes that incorporated detour problems. Six monkeys initially were significantly less likely to choose the correct paths when detours were required than when not. Three of the six monkeys repeatedly practiced the 192 mazes to asymptotic mastery; the other three did not practice the mazes again. In a subsequent transfer test, each monkey made correct choices equivalently often on familiar and novel mazes, which suggests that they used general planning skills for maze navigation. Of the three monkeys that practiced the 192 maze-set repeatedly, one efficiently detoured and the other two significantly improved detouring compared to their initial performance. Two monkeys, contrary to their performance when completing the 192 maze-set for the first time, made correct choices at the same rate as chimpanzees. Some evidence suggested that two monkeys used topological information, but utilization of vector information was obvious for all monkeys. Our findings suggest that the boundaries of any individual's navigational abilities are not predicted by species, but depend on experience.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21138761      PMCID: PMC3434124          DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  13 in total

1.  Representation of place by monkey hippocampal neurons in real and virtual translocation.

Authors:  Etsuro Hori; Eiichi Tabuchi; Nobuhisa Matsumura; Ryoi Tamura; Satoshi Eifuku; Shunro Endo; Hisao Nishijo; Taketoshi Ono
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.899

2.  Navigation in virtual environment by the macaque monkey.

Authors:  Nobuya Sato; Hideo Sakata; Yuji Tanaka; Masato Taira
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Representation of immediate and final behavioral goals in the monkey prefrontal cortex during an instructed delay period.

Authors:  Naohiro Saito; Hajime Mushiake; Kazuhiro Sakamoto; Yasuto Itoyama; Jun Tanji
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Place-related neural responses in the monkey hippocampal formation in a virtual space.

Authors:  Etsuro Hori; Yoichi Nishio; Kenichi Kazui; Katsumi Umeno; Eiichi Tabuchi; Kazuo Sasaki; Shunro Endo; Taketoshi Ono; Hisao Nishijo
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 5.  What wild primates know about resources: opening up the black box.

Authors:  Charles H Janson; Richard Byrne
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  What guides a search for food that has disappeared? Experiments on cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).

Authors:  M D Hauser; T Williams; J D Kralik; D Moskovitz
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Intuitions about gravity and solidity in great apes: the tubes task.

Authors:  Trix Cacchione; Josep Call
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2010-03

8.  Joystick acquisition in tufted capuchins (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Katherine A Leighty; Dorothy M Fragaszy
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2003-06-28       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Navigating two-dimensional mazes: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and capuchins (Cebus apella sp.) profit from experience differently.

Authors:  Dorothy M Fragaszy; Erica Kennedy; Aeneas Murnane; Charles Menzel; Gene Brewer; Julie Johnson-Pynn; William Hopkins
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Strategic navigation of two-dimensional alley mazes: comparing capuchin monkeys and chimpanzees.

Authors:  D Fragaszy; J Johnson-Pynn; E Hirsh; K Brakke
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2002-08-09       Impact factor: 3.084

View more
  4 in total

1.  I scan, therefore I decline: The time course of difficulty monitoring in humans (homo sapiens) and macaques (macaca mulatta).

Authors:  J David Smith; Joseph Boomer; Barbara A Church; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Michael J Beran; Michael L Baum
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  What limits tool use in nonhuman primates? Insights from tufted capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) aligning three-dimensional objects to a surface.

Authors:  L T la Cour; B W Stone; W Hopkins; C Menzel; Dorothy M Fragaszy
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Looking ahead? Computerized maze task performance by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella), and human children (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Audrey E Parrish; Sara E Futch; Theodore A Evans; Bonnie M Perdue
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) navigate to find hidden fruit in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Matthias Allritz; Josep Call; Ken Schweller; Emma S McEwen; Miguel de Guinea; Karline R L Janmaat; Charles R Menzel; Francine L Dolins
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 14.957

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.