Literature DB >> 21138745

Relation between reaction time and reach errors during visuomotor adaptation.

Juan Fernandez-Ruiz1, William Wong, Irene T Armstrong, J Randall Flanagan.   

Abstract

Adaptation of reaching movements to visuomotor transformations is generally thought to involve implicit or procedural learning. However, there is evidence that explicit or cognitive processes can also play a role (Redding and Wallace, 2006 [31]). For example, the early phase of adaptation to a visuomotor rotation appears to involve spatial working memory processes linked to mental rotation (Anguera et al., 2010 [11]). Since it is known that cognitive processes like mental rotation lead to larger reaction times (Georgopoulos and Massey, 1987 [12]), here we explored the relation between reaction time (RT) and reach error reduction. Two groups of subjects adapted their reaching movements to a 60° visuomotor rotation either without RT constraints or with RT limited to 350 ms. In the unconstrained group, we found that adaption rate varied widely across subjects and was strongly correlated with RT. Subjects who decreased hand direction error (DE) rapidly exhibited prolonged RTs whereas little RT cost was seen in subjects who decreased DE gradually. RTs were also correlated with after-effects seen when the visuomotor rotation was removed. Subjects with the longest RTs exhibited the smallest after-effects. In the RT constrained group, all subjects exhibited gradual DE adaptation and large after-effects, similar to the fast responders in the free group. These results suggest that adaptation to a visuomotor rotation can involve processes that produce faster error reductions without increasing after-effects, but at an expense of larger reaction times. Possible candidates are processes related to spatial working memory, and more specifically, to mental rotation.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21138745     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.11.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  61 in total

Review 1.  Principles of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Jörn Diedrichsen; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Enhanced mechanical transparency during practice impedes open-loop control of a complex tool.

Authors:  Sandra Sülzenbrück; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Adapting to inversion of the visual field: a new twist on an old problem.

Authors:  Timothy P Lillicrap; Pablo Moreno-Briseño; Rosalinda Diaz; Douglas B Tweed; Nikolaus F Troje; Juan Fernandez-Ruiz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 neurodegeneration differentially affects error-based and strategic-based visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Israel Vaca-Palomares; Rosalinda Díaz; Roberto Rodríguez-Labrada; Jacqeline Medrano-Montero; Yaimé Vázquez-Mojena; Luis Velázquez-Pérez; Juan Fernandez-Ruiz
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Manipulating visual-motor experience to probe for observation-induced after-effects in adaptation learning.

Authors:  Shannon B Lim; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Rapid Automatic Motor Encoding of Competing Reach Options.

Authors:  Jason P Gallivan; Brandie M Stewart; Lee A Baugh; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  A spatial explicit strategy reduces error but interferes with sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Bryan L Benson; Joaquin A Anguera; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Trial-by-trial analysis of intermanual transfer during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Greg J Wojaczynski; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Formation of a long-term memory for visuomotor adaptation following only a few trials of practice.

Authors:  David M Huberdeau; Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; John W Krakauer; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.