Literature DB >> 2113680

Is there a hard-to-reach audience?

V S Freimuth1, W Mettger.   

Abstract

The "hard-to-reach" label has been applied to many different audiences. Persons who have a low socioeconomic status (SES), members of ethnic minorities, and persons who have a low level of literacy often are tagged as "hard-to-reach." The authors identify reasons why these groups have been labelled "hard-to-reach," discuss preconceptions associated with the "hard-to-reach" label, propose alternative conceptualizations of these audiences, and present implications of such conceptualizations for health communication campaigns. Pejorative labels and preconceptions about various groups may lead to depicting these audiences as powerless, apathetic, and isolated. The authors discuss alternative conceptualizations, which highlight the strengths of different audience segments and encourage innovative approaches to the communication process. These alternative conceptualizations emphasize interactive communication, a view of society in which individuals are seen as members of equivalent--albeit different--cultures, and a shift of responsibility for health problems from individuals to social systems. Recommendations for incorporating these alternative concepts into health campaigns include formative research techniques that create a dialogue among participants, more sophisticated segmentation techniques to capture audience diversity, and new roles for mass media that are more interactive and responsive to individual needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2113680      PMCID: PMC1580016     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  1 in total

1.  Low income and barriers to use of health services.

Authors:  L Bergner; A S Yerby
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1968-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

  1 in total
  32 in total

1.  Equity in prevention and health care.

Authors:  V Lorant; B Boland; P Humblet; D Deliège
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Communication for better health.

Authors:  J M McGinnis
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Educational level and decreases in leisure time physical activity: predictors from the longitudinal GLOBE study.

Authors:  M Droomers; C T Schrijvers; J P Mackenbach
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Using entertainment-education to promote cervical cancer screening in Thai women.

Authors:  Gail D Love; Sora Park Tanjasiri
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Use of lay health educators for smoking cessation in a hard-to-reach urban community.

Authors:  L Lacey; S Tukes; C Manfredi; R B Warnecke
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1991-10

Review 6.  The role of Latino/Hispanic communities in health services research: strategies for a meaningful partnership.

Authors:  R E Zambrana
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 7.  Impact of poverty on women's health.

Authors:  M Cohen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 8.  Peer Support for the Hardly Reached: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rebeccah Sokol; Edwin Fisher
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  'Reaching the hard to reach'--lessons learned from the VCS (voluntary and community Sector). A qualitative study.

Authors:  Sarah M Flanagan; Beverley Hancock
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  A community-based heart disease intervention: predictors of change.

Authors:  M A Winkleby; J A Flora; H C Kraemer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.