M Droomers1, C T Schrijvers, J P Mackenbach. 1. Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands. droomers@mgz.fgg.eur.nl
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study describes educational differences in decreases in leisure time physical activity among an adult, physically active population and additionally attempts to identify predictors of these differences from information on health status and individual and environmental factors. DESIGN: Prospective population based study. Baseline measurement were carried out in 1991 and follow up in 1997. SETTING: South eastern part of the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 3793 subjects who were physically active in 1991 and who participated in the follow up. METHODS: Potential predictors of decreasing physical activity were measured in 1991. Logistic regression analyses were carried out for two age groups (< 45 years; > or = 45 years) separately. MAIN RESULTS: Lower educated respondents experienced statistically significant higher odds to decrease physical activity during follow up, compared with respondents with higher vocational schooling or a university degree. Perceived control was the main predictor of educational differences in decreasing physical activity in both age groups. In the older group, material problems and a poor perceived health experienced by lower educated people additionally predicted educational differences in decreases in physical activity during leisure time. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have important implications for health promotion practice and policy to prevent socioeconomic differences in physical inactivity and health. There is a need for evidence-based interventions that improve perceived control and reduce material problems in lower educated groups.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study describes educational differences in decreases in leisure time physical activity among an adult, physically active population and additionally attempts to identify predictors of these differences from information on health status and individual and environmental factors. DESIGN: Prospective population based study. Baseline measurement were carried out in 1991 and follow up in 1997. SETTING: South eastern part of the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 3793 subjects who were physically active in 1991 and who participated in the follow up. METHODS: Potential predictors of decreasing physical activity were measured in 1991. Logistic regression analyses were carried out for two age groups (< 45 years; > or = 45 years) separately. MAIN RESULTS: Lower educated respondents experienced statistically significant higher odds to decrease physical activity during follow up, compared with respondents with higher vocational schooling or a university degree. Perceived control was the main predictor of educational differences in decreasing physical activity in both age groups. In the older group, material problems and a poor perceived health experienced by lower educated people additionally predicted educational differences in decreases in physical activity during leisure time. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have important implications for health promotion practice and policy to prevent socioeconomic differences in physical inactivity and health. There is a need for evidence-based interventions that improve perceived control and reduce material problems in lower educated groups.
Authors: Kylie Ball; Anna Timperio; Jo Salmon; Billie Giles-Corti; Rebecca Roberts; David Crawford Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Astrid Etman; Carlijn B M Kamphuis; Tischa J M van der Cammen; Alex Burdorf; Frank J van Lenthe Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2014-07-23 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Annemarie Koster; Hans Bosma; Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Frank J van Lenthe; Jacques Th M van Eijk; Johan P Mackenbach Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Meg E Fluharty; Snehal M Pinto Pereira; Michaela Benzeval; Mark Hamer; Barbara Jefferis; Lucy J Griffiths; Rachel Cooper; David Bann Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-01-20 Impact factor: 2.692