Literature DB >> 21136213

A phase II randomized study comparing navelbine and capecitabine (Navcap) followed either by Navcap or by weekly docetaxel in the first-line treatment of HER-2/neu negative metastatic breast cancer.

M Ghosn1, P Aftimos, F S Farhat, J G Kattan, C Hanna, N Haddad, F Nasr, G Chahine.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Following the proven efficacy and tolerability of Navcap and Navcap followed by docetaxel in the treatment of MBC, a phase II randomized study was initiated to assess the ORR of both arms in the first-line setting of MBC. Patients with no prior chemotherapy for MBC and HER-2/neu negative were eligible. All patients received Navcap (V 25 mg/m2 on d1 and d8 and C 825 mg/m2 bid D1-14 q3w) for a total of 4 cycles. Patients progressing under Navcap were withdrawn and received docetaxel as second-line treatment. Patients responding or stable were randomized to 2 arms: 4 cycles of Navcap (A) or 12 weekly docetaxel (25 mg/m²/week) (B). From July 2004 to July 2008, a total of 106 patients were enrolled. Ninety-four patients were evaluable before randomization, with a clinical benefit of 58%. Twenty-one patients (22%) had disease progression and were therefore not randomized. Forty-one patients were randomized to arm A and 29 patients to arm B. ORRs were 56 and 71% in arms A and B, respectively. The median time to progression and overall survival were 10 and 35 months in arm A and 12 and 37 months in arm B. Adverse events were mild. Arm A: grade 3-4 neutropenia (10%), grade 3 anemia (5%). Arm B: grade 3 neutropenia (6%), grade 3 anemia (6.2%), and grade 2 alopecia (12%).
CONCLUSION: Both Navcap and Navcap followed by Docetaxel regimens were tolerated with manageable toxicity, offering consistent activities in terms of response rate for metastatic breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21136213     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-010-9754-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  23 in total

Review 1.  False positive rates of randomized phase II designs.

Authors:  P Y Liu; M LeBlanc; M Desai
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1999-08

2.  Randomized phase III study of docetaxel compared with paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  S E Jones; J Erban; B Overmoyer; G T Budd; L Hutchins; E Lower; L Laufman; S Sundaram; W J Urba; K I Pritchard; R Mennel; D Richards; S Olsen; M L Meyers; P M Ravdin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  New developments in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: from chemotherapy to biological therapy.

Authors:  G Mariani
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Multicenter, Phase II study of capecitabine in taxane-pretreated metastatic breast carcinoma patients.

Authors:  J L Blum; V Dieras; P M Lo Russo; J Horton; O Rutman; A Buzdar; B Osterwalder
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Phase II trial of capecitabine and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Marwan Ghosn; Joseph Kattan; Fadi Farhat; Fariha Younes; Jamal Gasmi
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Randomized, open-label, phase II trial of oral capecitabine (Xeloda) vs. a reference arm of intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  J A Oshaughnessy; J Blum; V Moiseyenko; S E Jones; D Miles; D Bell; R Rosso; L Mauriac; B Osterwalder; H U Burger; S Laws
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 7.  Capecitabine.

Authors:  M Dooley; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  S Chan; K Friedrichs; D Noel; T Pintér; S Van Belle; D Vorobiof; R Duarte; M Gil Gil; I Bodrogi; E Murray; L Yelle; G von Minckwitz; S Korec; P Simmonds; F Buzzi; R González Mancha; G Richardson; E Walpole; M Ronzoni; M Murawsky; M Alakl; A Riva; J Crown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Psychological sequelae and alopecia among women with cancer.

Authors:  E L McGarvey; L D Baum; R C Pinkerton; L M Rogers
Journal:  Cancer Pract       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec

10.  Capecitabine and vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline and taxane.

Authors:  Jin-Hee Ahn; Sung-Bae Kim; Tae-Won Kim; Sei-Hyun Ahn; Sun-Mi Kim; Jeong-Mi Park; Jung-Shin Lee; Yoon-Koo Kang; Woo Kun Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Taxane-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Davina Ghersi; Melina L Willson; Matthew Ming Ki Chan; John Simes; Emma Donoghue; Nicholas Wilcken
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-10

2.  Capecitabine for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Siao-Nge Hoon; Peter Kh Lau; Alison M White; Max K Bulsara; Patricia D Banks; Andrew D Redfern
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.