Literature DB >> 21136096

A new application of the four-arm standard da Vinci® surgical system: totally robotic-assisted left-sided colon or rectal resection.

Dean Chi-Siong Koh1, Charles Bih-Shou Tsang, Seon-Hahn Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The key to successful rectal cancer resection is to perform complete total mesorectal excision (TME). Laparoscopic TME can be challenging, especially in the narrow confines of the pelvis. Robotic-assisted surgery can overcome these limitations through superior three-dimensional (3-D) visualization and the increased range of movements provided by the endowrist function. To date, all totally robotic resections of the rectum have been described using da Vinci® S or Si systems. Due to the limitations of the standard system, only hybrid procedures have been described so far. AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and short-term outcomes of performing totally robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal resections using the standard da Vinci® system with a fourth arm extension.
METHODS: The standard system was docked from the patient's left hip. Four 8-mm robotic trocars were inserted. Upon completion of phase 1 (pedicle ligation, colonic mobilization, splenic flexure takedown), the two left-sided arms are repositioned to allow phase 2 (pelvic dissection), enabling the entire procedure except for the distal transection and anastomosis to be performed robotically.
RESULTS: Twenty-one robotic procedures were performed from August 2008 to September 2009. The mean age of the patients was 61 years (13 males). The procedures performed included seven anterior resections, seven low anterior resections, five ultralow anterior resections, one abdominoperineal resection, and one resection rectopexy. The majority of the cases were performed in patients with colon or rectal cancer. Operative time ranged from 232 to 444 (mean 316) min. Postoperative morbidity occurred in three patients (14.3%) with no mortalities or conversions. Average hospital stay was 6.4 days. Mean lymph node yield for the cases with cancer was 17.8.
CONCLUSIONS: The standard da Vinci® system with four arms can be used to perform totally robotic-assisted colorectal procedures for the left colon and rectum with short-term outcomes similar to those of conventional laparoscopic techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21136096     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1492-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  12 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  W W C Tsang; C C Chung; S Y Kwok; M K W Li
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  A standardized technique for robotically performed sigmoid colectomy.

Authors:  George DeNoto; Eugene Rubach; Thanjuvar S Ravikumar
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 3.  What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer?

Authors:  Iris D Nagtegaal; Phil Quirke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Totally robotic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and splenic flexure mobilization.

Authors:  Minia Hellan; Hubert Stein; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation.

Authors:  M R Weiser; J W Milsom
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-12

Review 6.  Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  S Breukink; J Pierie; T Wiggers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

7.  Single-stage totally robotic dissection for rectal cancer surgery: technique and short-term outcome in 50 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Dong Jin Choi; Seon Hahn Kim; Peter J M Lee; Jin Kim; Si Uk Woo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  S H Baik; Y T Ko; C M Kang; W J Lee; N K Kim; S K Sohn; H S Chi; C H Cho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using four robotic arms.

Authors:  Seung Hyuk Baik; Woo Jung Lee; Koon Ho Rha; Nam Kyu Kim; Seung Kook Sohn; Hoon Sang Chi; Chang Hwan Cho; Sang Kil Lee; Jae Hee Cheon; Joong Bae Ahn; Won Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome.

Authors:  Fabrizio Luca; Sabine Cenciarelli; Manuela Valvo; Simonetta Pozzi; Felice Lo Faso; Davide Ravizza; Giulia Zampino; Angelica Sonzogni; Roberto Biffi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  15 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Shuang Lin; Hong-Gang Jiang; Zhi-Heng Chen; Shu-Yang Zhou; Xiao-Sun Liu; Ji-Ren Yu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database.

Authors:  Anuradha R Bhama; Vincent Obias; Kathleen B Welch; James F Vandewarker; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Risk factors for postoperative complications in robotic general surgery.

Authors:  Giovanni Fantola; Laurent Brunaud; Phi-Linh Nguyen-Thi; Adeline Germain; Ahmet Ayav; Laurent Bresler
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-09-30

4.  SAGES evidence-based guidelines for the laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Marc Zerey; Lisa Martin Hawver; Ziad Awad; Dimitrios Stefanidis; William Richardson; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chang Woo Kim; Chang Hee Kim; Seung Hyuk Baik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review of current practice.

Authors:  Tony Wing Chung Mak; Janet Fung Yee Lee; Kaori Futaba; Sophie Sok Fei Hon; Dennis Kwok Yu Ngo; Simon Siu Man Ng
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-06-15

Review 7.  Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision: should it be considered as the technique of choice in the management of rectal cancer?

Authors:  J Clark; K Shetty; M H Sodergren; D R C James; S Purkayastha; T Athanasiou; G-Z Yang; A Darzi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-09-27

8.  Is minimally invasive colon resection better than traditional approaches?: First comprehensive national examination with propensity score matching.

Authors:  Yen-Yi Juo; Omar Hyder; Adil H Haider; Melissa Camp; Anne Lidor; Nita Ahuja
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo; Victor Edmond Seid; Sidney Klajner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Use of robotics in colon and rectal surgery.

Authors:  Michael J Pucci; Alec C Beekley
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.