Literature DB >> 21134950

A multi-faceted strategy to improve the use of national fertility guidelines; a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Selma M Mourad1, Rosella P M G Hermens, Janine Liefers, Reinier P Akkermans, G A Zielhuis, E Adang, Richard P T M Grol, Willianne L D M Nelen, Jan A M Kremer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND Proper use of clinical practice guidelines can decrease variation in care between settings. However, actual use of fertility guidelines is suboptimal and in need of improvement. Hence, a cluster-randomized controlled trial was designed to study the effects of two strategies to implement national Dutch guidelines on comprehensive fertility care. METHODS Sixteen fertility clinics participated in the trial. A minimal, professional-oriented implementation strategy of audit and feedback was tested versus a maximal multi-faceted strategy that was both professional and patient oriented. The extent of adherence to guideline recommendations, reflected in quality indicator scores, was the primary outcome measure. To gain an insight into unwanted side effects, patient anxiety and depression scores were gathered as secondary outcomes. Data collection encompassed medical record search, patient and professional questionnaires. RESULTS A total of 1499 couples were included at baseline and 1396 at the after-measurement. No overall significant improvement in indicator scores was found for either strategy [odds ratios ranging from 0.23 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.06-0.95) to 6.66 (95% CI: 0.33-132.8]. Secondary outcomes did not differ significantly for both groups, although selected anxiety scores appeared lower in the maximal intervention group. Process evaluation of the trial revealed positive patient experiences with the intervention material [e.g. an increased understanding of their doctor's treatment policy (61%), an increased ability to ask questions about the treatment (61%)]. Professionals' appreciation of intervention elements varied, and execution of the multi-faceted strategy appeared incomplete. DISCUSSION Absence of an intervention effect may be due to the nature of the strategies, incomplete execution or flaws in study design. Process evaluation data raise the question of whether professionals should be the only stakeholder responsible for guideline implementation. This study therefore contributes to an increased understanding of fertility guideline implementation in general, and the role of patients in particular.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21134950     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  8 in total

Review 1.  Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.

Authors:  Dianne Lowe; Rebecca Ryan; Lina Schonfeld; Bronwen Merner; Louisa Walsh; Lisa Graham-Wisener; Sophie Hill
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-15

Review 2.  Barriers and Strategies in Guideline Implementation-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Florian Fischer; Kerstin Lange; Kristina Klose; Wolfgang Greiner; Alexander Kraemer
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-29

3.  Claims for fertility interventions: a systematic assessment of statements on UK fertility centre websites.

Authors:  E A Spencer; K R Mahtani; B Goldacre; C Heneghan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-27       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  'Making the most of together time': development of a Health Visitor-led intervention to support children's early language and communication development at the 2-2½-year-old review.

Authors:  Cristina McKean; Rose Watson; Jenna Charlton; Sue Roulstone; Caitlin Holme; Victoria Gilroy; James Law
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2022-02-08

5.  Impact of psychological stress on the outcomes of assisted reproduction in Tunisian infertile women.

Authors:  Amira Sallem; Habiba Essoussi; Henda Ben Mustapha; Monia Zaouali; Mounir Ajina
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-12-21

6.  Improving patient-centeredness of fertility care using a multifaceted approach: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Aleida G Huppelschoten; Noortje T L van Duijnhoven; Rosella P M G Hermens; Chris Verhaak; Jan A M Kremer; Willianne L D M Nelen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Improving the implementation of tailored expectant management in subfertile couples: protocol for a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Noortje M van den Boogaard; Fleur A M Kersten; Mariëtte Goddijn; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Fulco van der Veen; Peter G A Hompes; Rosella P M G Hermens; Didi D M Braat; Ben Willem J Mol; Willianne L D M Nelen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Critical factors influencing physicians' intention to use computerized clinical practice guidelines: an integrative model of activity theory and the technology acceptance model.

Authors:  Ju-Ling Hsiao; Rai-Fu Chen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 2.796

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.