Literature DB >> 21132495

In vitro biomechanical study of femoral torsion disorders: effect on tibial proximal epiphyseal cancellous bone deformation.

Stéphane Sobczak1, Bruno Baillon, Véronique Feipel, Serge Van Sint Jan, Patrick Salvia, Marcel Rooze.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a degenerative disease mainly found in elderly population. Valgus deformity seems to be directly related to lateralised gonarthrosis. Contradictory outcomes of surgical series are published in the literature and report satisfactory and unsatisfactory long-term results. Lower limb torsions disorders have been considered as being another factor inducing gonarthrosis. This paper presents an in vitro study aiming at quantifying the relationships between experimental femoral torsion disorders (medial and lateral) and the deformation of the cancellous bone of the proximal tibial epiphysis (CB(TPE)).
METHODS: Five left fresh-frozen lower limbs were used. Specimens were mounted on an experimental jig and muscles were loaded. Six measurement elements, including strain gages, were introduced into CB(TPE) to measure relative deformation. Experimental osteotomy control was performed using a specially devised system allowing various amplitudes of medial and lateral torsion. CB(TPE) deformations were measured during knee flexion movement.
RESULTS: Intra-observer reproducibility of CB(TPE) deformations showed a mean coefficient of multiple correlation of 0.93 and a mean coefficient of variation of 9% for flexion. Intra-specimen repeatability showed a mean RMS difference ranging from 7 to 10% and a mean ICC of 0.98. CB(TPE) deformations were significantly influenced by femoral torsion disorder conditions and range-of-motion (ROM) for most measurement elements. No interaction between torsion condition and ROM was observed. Globally, CB(TPE) deformation in the lateral compartment increased during experimental lateral torsion disorder simulation and decreased during medial torsion simulation. The opposite behaviour was observed in the medial compartment. The decrease and/or increase were not always proportional to the degree of femoral torsional disorder simulated.
CONCLUSION: Experimental results from this study do not fully agree with previously published clinical observations on the femoral torsion disorder. The present quantified results do not support that medial femoral torsion disorder induces an increased lateral tibial deformation, which could be linked to gonarthrosis observed in this compartment. In summary, our results showed that medial and lateral femoral torsion disorder conditions applied in normally aligned lower limb induced a deformation increase in the medial and in the lateral compartment, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21132495     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-010-0753-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  44 in total

1.  Tibiofemoral contact points relative to flexion angle measured with MRI.

Authors:  Per Wretenberg; Dan K Ramsey; Gunnar Németh
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  A method for measuring contact pressures instantaneously in articular joints.

Authors:  H Inaba; M Arai
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Age variations in the properties of human tibial trabecular bone.

Authors:  M Ding; M Dalstra; C C Danielsen; J Kabel; I Hvid; F Linde
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-11

4.  Mechanical changes in the knee after meniscectomy.

Authors:  W R Krause; M H Pope; R J Johnson; D G Wilder
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Distal femoral varus osteotomy.

Authors:  W L Healy; J O Anglen; S A Wasilewski; K A Krackow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Tibial torsion in patients with medial-type osteoarthritic knee.

Authors:  T Yagi; T Sasaki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The load-bearing area in the knee joint.

Authors:  P S Walker; J V Hajek
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The treatment of choice in osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  P Maquet
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  MR imaging findings in the follow-up of patients with different stages of knee osteoarthritis and the correlation with clinical symptoms.

Authors:  Catherine M Phan; Thomas M Link; Gabrielle Blumenkrantz; Timothy C Dunn; Michael D Ries; Lynne S Steinbach; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Quantification of patellofemoral joint contact area using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jacklyn Heino Brechter; Christopher M Powers; Michael R Terk; Samuel R Ward; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.