Literature DB >> 21132294

Cost-utility estimation of surgical treatment of pancreatic carcinoma aimed at cure.

David Ljungman1, Kent Lundholm, Anders Hyltander.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is reported on costs for radical tumor resections of pancreatic carcinoma in relationship to adjusted quality of life survival postoperatively. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to estimate the cost utility of surgical treatment aimed at cure.
METHODS: A population-based cohort of patients with exocrine or ampullary pancreatic adenocarcinoma resected for cure in Gothenburg University Hospitals during 1998-2005 were evaluated retrospectively (n = 139). Total inpatient and outpatient healthcare costs were available for 103 patients, and health-related quality of life (HRQL) (based on the SF-36 Health Survey) were assessed preoperatively and postoperataively in 119 patients. Survival and utility index (SF-36-6D) across 5 years of postoperative follow-up were used to achieve quality adjusted life years.
RESULTS: Mean survival after resection was 977 days for patients with exocrine pancreatic carcinoma, with expected differences among subgroups as related to disease stage (p < 0.01), in agreement with international reports. The HRQL index was 0.65 ± 0.06 preoperatively, 0.63 ± 0.04 early postoperatively (<1 year) and 0.69 ± 0.06 at long-term follow-up (1-5 years) compared to 0.77 ± 0.02 in age-matched healthy reference individuals from the Swedish population (p < 0.05). Total lifetime costs for treatments including surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy were 39,000 euro per patient, with a mean of 1.13 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.93-1.40) QALYs across 5 years follow-up. The cost per QALY was 35,000 euro (95% CI 28,026 euro-41,947 euro).
CONCLUSIONS: Resection aimed at cure of pancreatic exocrine ductal carcinoma provided costs for one quality adjusted year of survival comparable to other complex surgical treatments within cost limits regarded as reasonable to bear by the Swedish health care system, as well as in several other Western countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21132294     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0883-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  50 in total

Review 1.  Simultaneous analysis of quality of life and survival data.

Authors:  L J Billingham; K R Abrams
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

Authors:  John Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Mark Deverill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Immunoperoxidase staining in the detection of lymph node metastases in stage I breast cancer.

Authors:  W A Raymond; A S Leong
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 5.306

4.  Cost analysis of pancreatic carcinoma treatment.

Authors:  W Du; D Touchette; V K Vaitkevicius; W P Peters; A F Shields
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Early lymphatic tumor cell dissemination in pancreatic cancer: frequency and prognostic significance.

Authors:  S B Hosch; W T Knoefel; S Metz; N Stoecklein; A Niendorf; C E Broelsch; J R Izbicki
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Markus W Büchler; Markus Wagner; Bruno M Schmied; Waldemar Uhl; Helmut Friess; Kaspar Z'graggen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-12

7.  The cost of treating pancreatic cancer--a cohort study based on patients' records from four hospitals in Sweden.

Authors:  Jonas Hjelmgren; Jeanette Ceberg; Ulf Persson; Thor A Alvegård
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 8.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) versus pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  M K Diener; C Heukaufer; G Schwarzer; C M Seiler; G Antes; M W Buchler; H P Knaebel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16

9.  Periampullary adenocarcinoma: analysis of 5-year survivors.

Authors:  C J Yeo; T A Sohn; J L Cameron; R H Hruban; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Midterm cost-effectiveness of the liver transplantation program of England and Wales for three disease groups.

Authors:  Louise Longworth; Tracey Young; Martin J Buxton; Julie Ratcliffe; James Neuberger; Andrew Burroughs; Stirling Bryan
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.799

View more
  11 in total

1.  The value of liver magnetic resonance imaging in patients with findings of resectable pancreatic cancer on computed tomography.

Authors:  Cindy Chew; Patrick J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Life, liberty, and the pursuit of quality-adjusted life-years after pancreatic cancer surgery.

Authors:  David B Adams
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Cost-effectiveness comparison of prophylactic octreotide and pasireotide for prevention of fistula after pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Thilo Welsch; Benjamin Müssle; Marius Distler; Holger Knoth; Jürgen Weitz; Dennis Häckl
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Stakeholders in outcome measures: review from a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Mark R Brinker; Daniel P O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Impact on quality of life after pancreatoduodenectomy: a prospective study comparing preoperative and postoperative scores.

Authors:  Carlos Chan; Bernardo Franssen; Ismael Domínguez; Alejandro Ramírez-Del Val; Luis F Uscanga; Manuel Campuzano
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Comparative analysis of the revenues of pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resections and laparoscopic cholecystectomies as prototypic surgical procedures in the German health-care system.

Authors:  Tina Stellwag; Christoph W Michalski; Bo Kong; Mert Erkan; Carolin Reiser-Erkan; Carsten Jäger; Christian Meinl; Helmut Friess; Jörg Kleeff
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Early and late postoperative changes in the quality of life after pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Orlin Belyaev; Torsten Herzog; Ansgar M Chromik; Kirsten Meurer; Waldemar Uhl
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Cost-utility estimations of palliative care in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  David Ljungman; Anders Hyltander; Kent Lundholm
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Can Centralization of Cancer Surgery Improve Social Welfare?

Authors:  Vivian Ho; Marah N Short; Meei-Hsiang Ku-Goto
Journal:  Forum Health Econ Policy       Date:  2012-10-16

Review 10.  Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Deniece Riviere; C J H van Laarhoven; Marc Besselink; Mohammed Abu-Hilal; Brian R Davidson; Steve Morris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.