Literature DB >> 21131722

Modeling opportunities in comparative oncology for drug development.

Ira K Gordon1, Chand Khanna.   

Abstract

Successful development of novel cancer drugs depends on well-reasoned scientific drug discovery, rigorous preclinical development, and carefully conceived clinical trials. Failure in any of these steps contributes to poor rates of approval for new drugs to treat cancer. As technological and scientific advances have opened the door to a variety of novel approaches to cancer drug discovery and development, preclinical models that can answer questions about the activity and safety of novel therapies are increasingly necessary. The advance of a drug to clinical trials based on information from preclinical models presupposes that the models convey informative data for future use in human patients with cancer. The study of novel cancer drugs using in vitro models is highly controllable, reproducible, relatively inexpensive, and linked to high throughput. However, these models fail to reproduce many of the complex features of human cancer. Mouse models address some of these limitations but have important biological differences from human cancer. The integration of studies using pet dogs with spontaneously occurring tumors as models in the development path can answer questions not adequately addressed in conventional models and is therefore gaining attention and interest in drug development communities. The study of novel cancer drugs in dogs with naturally occurring tumors allows drug assessment in a cancer that shares many fundamental features with the human cancer condition, and thus provides an opportunity to answer questions that inform the cancer drug development path in ways not possible in more conventional models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21131722      PMCID: PMC7303812          DOI: 10.1093/ilar.51.3.214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ILAR J        ISSN: 1084-2020


  38 in total

1.  Guiding the optimal translation of new cancer treatments from canine to human cancer patients.

Authors:  Chand Khanna; Cheryl London; David Vail; Christina Mazcko; Steven Hirschfeld
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Oncology of companion animals as a model for humans. an overview of tumor histotypes.

Authors:  A Porrello; P Cardelli; E P Spugnini
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-03

Review 3.  The use of targeted mouse models for preclinical testing of novel cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Kenneth P Olive; David A Tuveson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Opinion: Comparative biology of mouse versus human cells: modelling human cancer in mice.

Authors:  Annapoorni Rangarajan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  Next generation oncology drug development: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Martin E Gutierrez; Shivaani Kummar; Giuseppe Giaccone
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Phase 0 clinical trials: conceptions and misconceptions.

Authors:  Shivaani Kummar; Larry Rubinstein; Robert Kinders; Ralph E Parchment; Martin E Gutierrez; Anthony J Murgo; Jay Ji; Barbara Mroczkowski; Oxana K Pickeral; Mel Simpson; Melinda Hollingshead; Sherry X Yang; Lee Helman; Robert Wiltrout; Jerry Collins; Joseph E Tomaszewski; James H Doroshow
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 7.  Multi-species toxicology approaches for oncology drugs: the US perspective.

Authors:  Joseph E Tomaszewski
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 8.  Of mice and men: values and liabilities of the athymic nude mouse model in anticancer drug development.

Authors:  L R Kelland
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 9.  Integrating pharmacology and in vivo cancer models in preclinical and clinical drug development.

Authors:  J K Peterson; P J Houghton
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer.

Authors:  N W Kim; M A Piatyszek; K R Prowse; C B Harley; M D West; P L Ho; G M Coviello; W E Wright; S L Weinrich; J W Shay
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-12-23       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Defining the Value of a Comparative Approach to Cancer Drug Development.

Authors:  Amy K LeBlanc; Christina N Mazcko; Chand Khanna
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Model-based assessment of erlotinib effect in vitro measured by real-time cell analysis.

Authors:  Stephan Benay; Christophe Meille; Stefan Kustermann; Isabelle Walter; Antje Walz; P Alexis Gonsard; Elina Pietilae; Nicole Kratochwil; Athanassios Iliadis; Adrian Roth; Thierry Lave
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Translating Nanomedicine to Comparative Oncology-the Case for Combining Zinc Oxide Nanomaterials with Nucleic Acid Therapeutic and Protein Delivery for Treating Metastatic Cancer.

Authors:  R K DeLong; Yi-Hsien Cheng; Paige Pearson; Zhoumeng Lin; Calli Coffee; Elza Neelima Mathew; Amanda Hoffman; Raelene M Wouda; Mary Lynn Higginbotham
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 4.  Creation of an NCI comparative brain tumor consortium: informing the translation of new knowledge from canine to human brain tumor patients.

Authors:  Amy K LeBlanc; Christina Mazcko; Diane E Brown; Jennifer W Koehler; Andrew D Miller; C Ryan Miller; R Timothy Bentley; Rebecca A Packer; Matthew Breen; C Elizabeth Boudreau; Jonathan M Levine; R Mark Simpson; Charles Halsey; William Kisseberth; John H Rossmeisl; Peter J Dickinson; Timothy M Fan; Kara Corps; Kenneth Aldape; Vinay Puduvalli; G Elizabeth Pluhar; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Species differences in tumour responses to cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jessica Lawrence; David Cameron; David Argyle
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Isolation, genetic manipulation, and transplantation of canine spermatogonial stem cells: progress toward transgenesis through the male germ-line.

Authors:  Michael A Harkey; Atsushi Asano; Mary Ellen Zoulas; Beverly Torok-Storb; Jennifer Nagashima; Alexander Travis
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Oncolytic reovirus in canine mast cell tumor.

Authors:  Chung Chew Hwang; Saori Umeki; Masahito Kubo; Toshiharu Hayashi; Hiroshi Shimoda; Masami Mochizuki; Ken Maeda; Kenji Baba; Hiroko Hiraoka; Matt Coffey; Masaru Okuda; Takuya Mizuno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Comparative Oncology Study of Iniparib Defines Its Pharmacokinetic Profile and Biological Activity in a Naturally-Occurring Canine Cancer Model.

Authors:  Corey Saba; Melissa Paoloni; Christina Mazcko; William Kisseberth; Jenna H Burton; Annette Smith; Heather Wilson-Robles; Sara Allstadt; David Vail; Carolyn Henry; Susan Lana; E J Ehrhart; Brad Charles; Michael Kent; Jessica Lawrence; Kristine Burgess; Antonella Borgatti; Steve Suter; Paul Woods; Ira Gordon; Patricia Vrignaud; Chand Khanna; Amy K LeBlanc
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A naturally occurring feline model of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jackie M Wypij
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2013-07-16

10.  Newcastle Disease Virus: Potential Therapeutic Application for Human and Canine Lymphoma.

Authors:  Diana Sánchez; Rosana Pelayo; Luis Alberto Medina; Eduardo Vadillo; Rogelio Sánchez; Luis Núñez; Gabriela Cesarman-Maus; Rosa Elena Sarmiento-Silva
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.