Literature DB >> 21131391

A comparison of finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests of the bracket-cement-enamel system.

T J Algera1, A J Feilzer, B Prahl-Andersen, C J Kleverlaan.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the in vitro shear bond strength (SBS) and tensile bond strength (TBS) of 45 metal brackets bonded with Transbond XT to bovine enamel. The SBS was determined by loading the short and the long sides of the bracket base. Testing took place after storage of the specimens for 72 hours in water at 37°C. Fractures were analysed with the adhesive remnant index (ARI) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). The stresses in the system were analysed with finite element (FE) analysis models of the experimental set-up to identify the initial fracture point and the stress distribution at fracture. Statistical analysis of bond strengths was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's post hoc test (P < 0.05). The ARI scores were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks. ANOVA showed significant differences between the three experiments. Loading the short side of the bracket resulted in the highest average bond strength. Tensile loading gave the lowest results. FE models supported the bond strength findings and SEM. FE analysis revealed peak stresses in the cement during loading, confirming that shear testing is sensitive to loading angles. The stress distribution over the bracket-cement-enamel system is not homogeneous during loading. Fractures are initiated at peak stress locations. As a consequence, the size of the bonding area is not predictive of bond strength. The bracket design and the mode of loading may be of greater relevance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21131391     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  6 in total

1.  Effect of material variation on the biomechanical behaviour of orthodontic fixed appliances: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Ludger Keilig; Istabrak Hasan; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Self-etch adhesives for the bonding of orthodontic brackets: faster, stronger, safer?

Authors:  Timea Lamper; Nicoleta Ilie; Karin C Huth; Ingrid Rudzki; Andrea Wichelhaus; Ekaterini Paschos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Comparison of two different debonding techniques in orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Luca Piccoli; Guido Migliau; Laith Konstantinos Besharat; Stefano Di Carlo; Giorgio Pompa; Roberto Di Giorgio
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2017-11-08

4.  Effect of bracket base design on shear bond strength to feldspathic porcelain.

Authors:  Kazem Dalaie; Armin Mirfasihi; Solmaz Eskandarion; Sattar Kabiri
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

5.  Evaluation of stresses developed in different bracket-cement-enamel systems using finite element analysis with in vitro bond strength tests.

Authors:  Shaymaa E Elsaka; Shaza M Hammad; Noha F Ibrahim
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.750

6.  Comparison of shear bond strength to clinically simulated debonding of orthodontic brackets: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Amal Ibrahim Linjawi; Mona A Abbassy
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.