Literature DB >> 21130350

The analysis of case-control studies of the efficacy of screening for recurrence of cancer.

Noel S Weiss1.   

Abstract

Occasionally, the efficacy of screening for cancer recurrence has been evaluated by means of case-control studies. However, these studies generally have not been designed and analyzed in a manner that will yield an unbiased result. The commentary shows that by adhering to the principles developed for the analysis of studies of the efficacy of screening for the presence of a given cancer in persons with no history of this disease, a case-control study of screening for recurrence will improve its chances of obtaining valid findings.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21130350      PMCID： PMC3052956          DOI： 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN： 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  6 in total

1.  Evaluating the efficacy of screening for recurrence of cancer.

Authors:  N S Weiss; L S Cook
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-12-16       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Healthy screened bias in epidemiologic studies of cancer incidence.

Authors:  N S Weiss; M A Rossing
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 3.  Application of the case-control method in the evaluation of screening.

Authors:  N S Weiss
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 4.  Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Andrew G Renehan; Matthias Egger; Mark P Saunders; Sarah T O'Dwyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

5.  Surveillance endoscopy does not improve survival for patients with local and regional stage colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Scott D Ramsey; Nadia Howlader; Ruth Etzioni; Martin L Brown; Joan L Warren; Polly Newcomb
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Mammography surveillance and mortality in older breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Timothy L Lash; Matthew P Fox; Diana S M Buist; Feifei Wei; Terry S Field; Floyd J Frost; Ann M Geiger; Virginia P Quinn; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Rebecca A Silliman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 44.544
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Long-term surveillance mammography and mortality in older women with a history of early stage invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Jaclyn L F Bosco; Rebecca A Silliman; Heather Taffet Gold; Terry Field; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Virginia P Quinn; Marianne Prout; Timothy L Lash
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Annual surveillance mammography after early-stage breast cancer and breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  L F Paszat; R Sutradhar; S Gu; E Rakovitch
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.677
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.