Literature DB >> 17548838

Mammography surveillance and mortality in older breast cancer survivors.

Timothy L Lash1, Matthew P Fox, Diana S M Buist, Feifei Wei, Terry S Field, Floyd J Frost, Ann M Geiger, Virginia P Quinn, Marianne Ulcickas Yood, Rebecca A Silliman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There are more than 2,000,000 breast cancer survivors in the United States today. While surveillance for asymptomatic recurrence and second primary is included in consensus recommendations, the effectiveness of this surveillance has not been well characterized. Our purpose is to estimate the effectiveness of surveillance mammography in a cohort of breast cancer survivors with complete ascertainment of surveillance mammograms and negligible losses to follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 1,846 stage I and II breast cancer patients who were at least 65 years old at six integrated health care delivery systems. We used medical record review and existing databases to ascertain patient, tumor, and therapy characteristics, as well as receipt of surveillance mammograms. We linked personal identifiers to the National Death Index to ascertain date and cause of death. We matched four controls to each breast cancer decedent to estimate the association between receipt of surveillance mammogram and breast cancer mortality.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy-eight women died of breast cancer during 5 years of follow-up. Each additional surveillance mammogram was associated with a 0.69-fold decrease in the odds of breast cancer mortality (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.92). The protective association was strongest among women with stage I disease, those who received mastectomy, and those in the oldest age group.
CONCLUSION: Given existing recommendations for post-therapy surveillance, trials to compare surveillance with no surveillance are unlikely. This large observational study provides support for the recommendations, suggesting that receipt of surveillance mammograms reduces the rate of breast cancer mortality in older patients diagnosed with early-stage disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17548838     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.9572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  53 in total

1.  Using lifetime risk estimates to recommend magnetic resonance imaging screening for breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Rinaa S Punglia; Michael J Hassett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Population-based longitudinal study of follow-up care for breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Eva Grunfeld; David C Hodgson; M Elisabeth Del Giudice; Rahim Moineddin
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Validation of electronic data on chemotherapy and hormone therapy use in HMOs.

Authors:  Debra P Ritzwoller; Nikki Carroll; Thomas Delate; Maureen O'Keeffe-Rossetti; Paul A Fishman; Elizabeth T Loggers; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Jennifer Elston-Lafata; Mark C Hornbrook
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Quality of post-treatment surveillance of early stage breast cancer in Texas.

Authors:  Abhishek D Parmar; Kristin M Sheffield; Gabriela M Vargas; Yimei Han; Celia Chao; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Actionable Locoregional Relapses after Therapy of Localized Esophageal Cancer: Insights from a Large Cohort.

Authors:  Elena Elimova; Xuemei Wang; Wei Qiao; Kazuki Sudo; Roopma Wadhwa; Hironori Shiozaki; Yusuke Shimodaira; Venkatram Planjery; Nikolaos Charalampakis; Jeffrey H Lee; Brian R Weston; Manoop S Bhutani; Ritsuko Komaki; David C Rice; Stephen G Swisher; Mariela A Blum; Jane E Rogers; Heath D Skinner; Dipen M Maru; Wayne L Hofstetter; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.935

6.  Five-year risk of interval-invasive second breast cancer.

Authors:  Janie M Lee; Diana S M Buist; Nehmat Houssami; Emily C Dowling; Elkan F Halpern; G Scott Gazelle; Constance D Lehman; Louise M Henderson; Rebecca A Hubbard
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Modeling the impact of population screening on breast cancer mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Kathleen A Cronin; Donald A Berry; Yaojen Chang; Harry J de Koning; Sandra J Lee; Sylvia K Plevritis; Clyde B Schechter; Natasha K Stout; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Marvin Zelen; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  Lasagna plots made in different (statistical) ovens.

Authors:  Hongyuan Gao; Diana S M Buist; Timothy L Lash; Jaclyn L F Bosco; Bruce Swihart
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 9.  Breast cancer screening: review of benefits and harms, and recommendations for developing and low-income countries.

Authors:  Meteb Al-Foheidi; Mubarak M Al-Mansour; Ezzeldin M Ibrahim
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Are cancer registries a viable tool for cancer survivor outreach? A feasibility study.

Authors:  Melissa Y Carpentier; Jasmin A Tiro; Lara S Savas; L Kay Bartholomew; Trisha V Melhado; Sharon P Coan; Keith E Argenbright; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.