| Literature DB >> 21128040 |
Mohit Gupta1, Jigar Kadakia, Yalcin Hacioglu, Naser Ahmadi, Amish Patel, Taeyoung Choi, Gregg Yamada, Matthew Budoff.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study evaluates whether non-contrast cardiac computed tomography (CCT) can detect chronic myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with irreversible perfusion defects on nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21128040 PMCID: PMC3032183 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-010-9314-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nucl Cardiol ISSN: 1071-3581 Impact factor: 5.952
Demographics of the total study population (N = 122)
| Age (years) | 63.5 ± 11.9 |
| Sex (M/F) | 71 (58.2%)/51 (41.8%) |
| Risk factors | |
| Hypertension | 83 (68.0%) |
| Cholesterol | 81 (66.4%) |
| Diabetes | 35 (28.7%) |
| Smoker | 17 (13.9%) |
| Family history | 58 (47.5%) |
| Race | |
| Caucasian | 66 (54.0%) |
| Hispanic | 26 (21.3%) |
| Asian | 24 (19.7%) |
| African American | 6 (4.9%) |
Characteristics of the groups with normal and irreversible perfusion defect on MPI
| Variable | Normal myocardial perfusion (N = 60) | Irreversible perfusion defect (N = 62) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 62 ± 11 | 64 ± 12 | .2 |
| Gender (male) | 30 | 42 | .046 |
| Hypertension | 67% | 69% | .7 |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 65% | 68% | .7 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 27% | 31% | .6 |
| Family history of CHD | 62% | 34% | .002 |
| Smoking status | 8% | 19% | .08 |
| Known CAD | 35% | 50% | .09 |
| Septal LV wall HU | 37 ± 19 | 14 ± 19 | .0001 |
| Antero-apical LV wall HU | 42 ± 16 | 16 ± 26 | .0001 |
| Lateral wall HU | 38 ± 19 | 13 ± 28 | .0001 |
| Inferior wall HU | 36 ± 26 | 8 ± 27 | .0001 |
HU, Hounsfield unit.
Figure 1(A) Axial, non-contrast CCT image demonstrating thin curvilinear hypo-attenuation (arrows) within distal septal, apical, and distal lateral LV myocardium in subendocardial distribution. (B) Axial, contrast-enhanced CCT image of the same patient shows thinning of associated portions (arrows) of the LV myocardium. (C) Sample placement of ROI within infarcted and normal myocardium on non-contrast CCT image to assess mean HU. ROI 1 mean HU = −71.9 (infarct), ROI 2 mean HU = 33 (normal myocardium)
Accuracy of non-contrast CCT to detect chronic MI as compared to irreversible perfusion defects on MPI as the reference
| Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | PPV (95% CI) | NPV (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per patient analysis | 91.9% (82.2–97.3) | 72.1% (59.2–82.9) | 76.7% (65.4–85.8) | 89.8% (77.8–96.6) |
| Per region analysis | 69.5% (59.8–78.1) | 85.4% (81.4–88.8) | 56.6% (47.6–65.3) | 91.1% (87.6–93.8) |
Figure 2(A) Axial, non-contrast CCT image demonstrating an infero-septal (arrowheads) and anterior (arrow) wall infarct. (B) Coronal, non-contrast CCT image confirming the infero-septal (arrowheads) infarct. Lead artifact makes the assessment of infarct difficult in this view. (C) Nuclear MPI of the same patient demonstrating the fixed perfusion defects
Figure 3Area under ROC curve for accuracy of non-contrast CCT to detect MI diagnosed by MPI
Figure 4ROC curve for accuracy of HU criterion to detect MI on non-contrast CCT
Intra- and inter-observer variability to detect MI on non-contrast CCT
| Variable |
| 95% CI | ICC |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intra-observer | 0.02 | −0.05 to 0.09 | 0.78 | .0001 |
| Inter-observer | 0.06 | −0.01 to 0.13 | 0.81 | .0001 |
D, mean ratio difference; ICC, intra-class correlation coefficient.