Literature DB >> 21128040

Non-contrast cardiac computed tomography can accurately detect chronic myocardial infarction: Validation study.

Mohit Gupta1, Jigar Kadakia, Yalcin Hacioglu, Naser Ahmadi, Amish Patel, Taeyoung Choi, Gregg Yamada, Matthew Budoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates whether non-contrast cardiac computed tomography (CCT) can detect chronic myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with irreversible perfusion defects on nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).
METHODS: One hundred twenty-two symptomatic patients with irreversible perfusion defect (N = 62) or normal MPI (N = 60) underwent coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning. MI on these non-contrast CCTs was visually detected based on the hypo-attenuation areas (dark) in the myocardium and corresponding Hounsfield units (HU) were measured.
RESULTS: Non-contrast CCT accurately detected MI in 57 patients with irreversible perfusion defect on MPI, yielding a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 72%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 90%, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 77%. On a per myocardial region analysis, non-contrast CT showed a sensitivity of 70%, specificity of 85%, NPV of 91%, and a PPV of 57%. The ROC curve showed that the optimal cutoff value of LV myocardium HU to predict MI on non-contrast CCT was 21.7 with a sensitivity of 97.4% and specificity of 99.7%.
CONCLUSION: Non-contrast CCT has an excellent agreement with MPI in detecting chronic MI. This study highlights a novel clinical utility of non-contrast CCT in addition to assessment of overall burden of atherosclerosis measured by CAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21128040      PMCID: PMC3032183          DOI: 10.1007/s12350-010-9314-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


Introduction

The principal cause of morbidity and mortality in all industrialized nations is coronary artery disease (CAD). In approximately half of these patients, the initial presentation of CAD is either myocardial infarction (MI) or death.1 Unrecognized MI leads to less effective management and increased major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Population-based studies have revealed that one-fourth of MIs demonstrated by Q waves on the ECG are clinically unrecognized and estimates of the frequency of unrecognized MI detected in the Framingham study may well underestimate the true prevalence of the condition.2 The 10-year mortality from an unrecognized MI has been estimated to be 45% to 55%3,4 comparable to or even higher than in patients with diagnosed MI. Given the implications of unrecognized MI, studies are needed to address screening strategies, risk stratification, and the role of post-infarction therapies in these patients.5 Nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has been widely used as a non-invasive method for the diagnosis of CAD. In comparative studies with autopsy findings, thallium (Tl)-201 myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has been shown to accurately assess the extent of MI6 and myocardial viability for the selection of therapy and for predicting prognosis.7-9 Although rest Tc-99m-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile (MIBI) underestimates the extent of viable myocardium compared with Tl-201 imaging, however several studies show that sublingual administration of nitroglycerin before a rest Tc-99m-MIBI study improves the detection of defect reversibility in exercise-induced perfusion defects and thus improves the assessment of myocardial viability in comparison with the standard Tc-99m-MIBI exercise–rest protocol.10,11 Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score measured through non-contrast cardiac computed tomography (CCT) scanning has been shown to predict future coronary events in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.12 Non-contrast CCT has also been used for assessing the pericardial fat,13 liver fat, and determining the field of view for CCT angiography (CCTA) to reduce radiation dose.14 The potential role of non-enhanced CCT to detect chronic MI, however, has not been well studied. Areas of chronic left ventricular (LV) infarction are readily apparent on non-contrast CCT as regions of hypo-attenuation either due to deposition of fibrous or adipose tissue15,16 or probably reduced capillary density.17 We conducted this study to evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of using non-contrast CCT to detect chronic MI in patients with irreversible perfusion defect on MPI. We also define the optimal cutoff value for LV myocardium Hounsfield unit (HU) to detect chronic MI.

Methods

Study Population

Our study included 122 consecutive symptomatic patients (with exertional angina or dyspnea) who were referred for coronary CAC scanning at our institution after undergoing an MPI study. Patients with reversible perfusion defects on MPI were excluded. Subjects with arrhythmia, renal failure, or hemodynamic instability were excluded. The characteristics of the study population are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1

Demographics of the total study population (N = 122)

Age (years)63.5 ± 11.9
Sex (M/F)71 (58.2%)/51 (41.8%)
Risk factors
 Hypertension83 (68.0%)
 Cholesterol81 (66.4%)
 Diabetes35 (28.7%)
 Smoker17 (13.9%)
 Family history58 (47.5%)
Race
 Caucasian66 (54.0%)
 Hispanic26 (21.3%)
 Asian24 (19.7%)
 African American6 (4.9%)
Table 2

Characteristics of the groups with normal and irreversible perfusion defect on MPI

VariableNormal myocardial perfusion (N = 60)Irreversible perfusion defect (N = 62) P-value
Age (years)62 ± 1164 ± 12.2
Gender (male)3042.046
Hypertension67%69%.7
Hypercholesterolemia65%68%.7
Diabetes mellitus27%31%.6
Family history of CHD62%34%.002
Smoking status8%19%.08
Known CAD35%50%.09
Septal LV wall HU37 ± 1914 ± 19.0001
Antero-apical LV wall HU42 ± 1616 ± 26.0001
Lateral wall HU38 ± 1913 ± 28.0001
Inferior wall HU36 ± 268 ± 27.0001

HU, Hounsfield unit.

Demographics of the total study population (N = 122) Characteristics of the groups with normal and irreversible perfusion defect on MPI HU, Hounsfield unit. Demographic data and clinical history were retrieved from the clinical records for all patients in the study group. Information about any evidence of previous clinical MI was also collected. MI in these patients was diagnosed by electrocardiogram findings (ST-segment elevation or depression, pathologic Q waves, new onset of left bundle branch block) and abnormal levels of cardiac enzymes.

Non-Contrast CCT Acquisition and Analysis

All CCTs were performed using 64-multidetector CT scanner (GE Healthcare). Following a scout radiograph of the chest (antero-posterior and lateral), the coronary arteries were imaged with 30-40 contiguous and 2.5-mm slices during mid-diastole using ECG-triggering during a 10-s breath hold. CAC scoring acquisition was reconstructed at 75% of the R–R interval with the use of axial planes and multiplanar reconstruction. All the non-enhanced CCT images were assessed by two experienced readers for presence and location of MI on Advantage Windows (AW) 4.4 Workstation (General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA). Longitudinal views of axial images were evaluated from base to apex to assess the septal, antero-apical, and lateral LV wall; coronal images were used to assess the inferior wall. MI on non-enhanced CCT was visually detected based on the areas of hypo-attenuation (dark) in the myocardium. Hypo-attenuation was assessed by the consensus of two experienced observers who blinded to the results of the MPI. The mean HU of normal and hypo-attenuated area were measured in the septal, antero-apical, lateral, and inferior LV walls. A standard region of interest (ROI) of 1 cm2 was used for the normal myocardium; and for areas with small hypo-attenuation, smaller ROI was used (Figure 1).
Figure 1

(A) Axial, non-contrast CCT image demonstrating thin curvilinear hypo-attenuation (arrows) within distal septal, apical, and distal lateral LV myocardium in subendocardial distribution. (B) Axial, contrast-enhanced CCT image of the same patient shows thinning of associated portions (arrows) of the LV myocardium. (C) Sample placement of ROI within infarcted and normal myocardium on non-contrast CCT image to assess mean HU. ROI 1 mean HU = −71.9 (infarct), ROI 2 mean HU = 33 (normal myocardium)

(A) Axial, non-contrast CCT image demonstrating thin curvilinear hypo-attenuation (arrows) within distal septal, apical, and distal lateral LV myocardium in subendocardial distribution. (B) Axial, contrast-enhanced CCT image of the same patient shows thinning of associated portions (arrows) of the LV myocardium. (C) Sample placement of ROI within infarcted and normal myocardium on non-contrast CCT image to assess mean HU. ROI 1 mean HU = −71.9 (infarct), ROI 2 mean HU = 33 (normal myocardium)

MPI Acquisition and Analysis

All the MPI scans were performed by the referring physicians at their respective offices. A standard imaging protocol as endorsed by ASNC was used for all patients.18 All patients underwent rest and stress imaging with technetium-99m-sestamibi (MIBI). Patients who could exercise underwent treadmill stress using the Bruce protocol to reach 85% of maximum predicted heart rate. Patients who could not exercise underwent pharmacological stress using dipyridamole at 142 mg/kg/min infused over 4 min. Patients were asked to terminate beta-blocker 24 h prior to testing when desirable. For resting studies, patients were injected with 9-10 mCi of technetium-99m-sestamibi and SPECT images were acquired 30-45 min after resting injection. All SPECT studies were acquired on a commercially available camera and computer using a 180-degree arc, high-resolution parallel-hole collimator; and 64 stops with 20 s per stop for a total imaging time of 25 min. All images were acquired using a 64 × 64 matrix. Patients underwent symptom-limited exercise Bruce protocol. At peak heart rate, 25-30 mCi of technetium-99m-sestamibi (dose was weight based) was injected. Patient then underwent post-stress SPECT image acquisition. The post-stress and rest MIBI scans were interpreted using visual assessment of perfusion abnormalities by the referring physicians. All the readers were nuclear board certified and blinded to the results of CT. The short axis data were displayed in polar map format, with the maps divided into 17 segments. The 17 segments were allocated to the territories of the different coronary arteries as previously described.19 For the sake of comparison with CT, the nuclear study results were then extrapolated into a 4-region model with the LV wall divided into septal, antero-apical, lateral, and inferior as done on CCT. Gating was not performed in all the MPI studies and thus regional wall motion was not assessed.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages, and continuous variables as mean ± standard deviations (SD). MPI served as the reference standard for the diagnosis of regional MI. The area under the receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve was calculated for MI assessed by non-contrast CCT to identify irreversible perfusion defect detected by MPI. Diagnostic performance and predictive value of non-contrast CCT for the diagnosis of regions showing MI compared with the reference standard was evaluated on a per patient level and per region level and expressed as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. The mean HU of normal and hypo-attenuated area in the septal, antero-apical, lateral, and inferior LV walls were compared to their corresponding areas in MPI and a second ROC was used to determine the myocardial HU threshold to detect MI using non-enhanced CCT. Intra- and inter-observer variability was calculated using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) in a two-way mixed effects model, and Bland & Altman models. All statistical analyses were performed using PASW 18.0 (SPSS Institute Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

A total of 122 patients were studied, including 62 patients (51%) with an irreversible perfusion defect on MPI and 60 patients with a normal MPI. The mean age for this patient cohort was 63.5 ± 12 years and 71(58%) were males. Out of the 62 patients with irreversible perfusion defect on MPI, non-contrast CCT accurately detected infarct in 57 subjects. Thus, on a per patient level and using MPI as the reference standard, non-contrast CCT showed a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI, 82.2-97.3), specificity of 72% (95% CI, 59.2-82.9), NPV of 90% (95% CI, 77.8-96.6), and a PPV of 77% (95% CI, 65.4-85.8), to detect regions of MI. On a per region level, non-contrast CCT showed a sensitivity of 70% (95% CI, 59.8-78.1), specificity of 85% (95% CI, 81.4-88.8), NPV of 91% (95% CI, 87.6-93.8), and a PPV of 57% (95% CI, 47.6-65.3) to detect regions of MI on MPI (Table 3). There was good agreement in the identification of hypo-enhanced regions between MPI and non-contrast CCT (Figures 2 and 3).
Table 3

Accuracy of non-contrast CCT to detect chronic MI as compared to irreversible perfusion defects on MPI as the reference

Sensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)PPV (95% CI)NPV (95% CI)
Per patient analysis91.9% (82.2–97.3)72.1% (59.2–82.9)76.7% (65.4–85.8)89.8% (77.8–96.6)
Per region analysis69.5% (59.8–78.1)85.4% (81.4–88.8)56.6% (47.6–65.3)91.1% (87.6–93.8)
Figure 2

(A) Axial, non-contrast CCT image demonstrating an infero-septal (arrowheads) and anterior (arrow) wall infarct. (B) Coronal, non-contrast CCT image confirming the infero-septal (arrowheads) infarct. Lead artifact makes the assessment of infarct difficult in this view. (C) Nuclear MPI of the same patient demonstrating the fixed perfusion defects

Figure 3

Area under ROC curve for accuracy of non-contrast CCT to detect MI diagnosed by MPI

Accuracy of non-contrast CCT to detect chronic MI as compared to irreversible perfusion defects on MPI as the reference (A) Axial, non-contrast CCT image demonstrating an infero-septal (arrowheads) and anterior (arrow) wall infarct. (B) Coronal, non-contrast CCT image confirming the infero-septal (arrowheads) infarct. Lead artifact makes the assessment of infarct difficult in this view. (C) Nuclear MPI of the same patient demonstrating the fixed perfusion defects Area under ROC curve for accuracy of non-contrast CCT to detect MI diagnosed by MPI The mean HU of the regions correctly identified as infarct or normal was calculated to be 5.1 ± 18.3 and 46.2 ± 8.2 (P < .0001), respectively. Based on a ROC curve, a reference HU of 21.7 can be used to detect infarcts on non-contrast CCT with a sensitivity of 97.4% and specificity of 98.7% (Figure 4).
Figure 4

ROC curve for accuracy of HU criterion to detect MI on non-contrast CCT

ROC curve for accuracy of HU criterion to detect MI on non-contrast CCT In a sub-study analysis, intra- and inter-observer variability of 25 patients with and without irreversible perfusion defect detected by MPI was assessed using visual and corresponding HU criteria methods on CCT. The intra- and inter-observer variability of CCT measured normal and hypo-attenuation segments were low (coefficient of variability of 2% for intra-observer and 6% for inter-observer variability). Furthermore, there was good intra- and inter-observer agreement to assess normal vs hypo-attenuated segments in CT (ICC: 0.78 and 0.811, respectively, P = .0001) (Table 4).
Table 4

Intra- and inter-observer variability to detect MI on non-contrast CCT

Variable D 95% CIICC P-value
Intra-observer0.02−0.05 to 0.090.78.0001
Inter-observer0.06−0.01 to 0.130.81.0001

D, mean ratio difference; ICC, intra-class correlation coefficient.

Intra- and inter-observer variability to detect MI on non-contrast CCT D, mean ratio difference; ICC, intra-class correlation coefficient. In a subgroup of 38 patients, with clinical evidence of prior MI diagnosed on the basis of electrocardiogram findings or abnormal levels of cardiac enzymes (as described in “Methods” section), hypo-attenuation on CAC scan was present in 30 patients yielding a sensitivity of 79% to detect chronic MI. Out of these 38 patients with clinical MI, irreversible perfusion defects on MPI were present in 32 patients.

Discussion

Contrast-enhanced CCTA has been shown to be comparable to MPI and contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in detecting fixed perfusion defect or scar as areas of late contrast enhancement.20-23 Hypo-enhanced regions on contrast-enhanced CCTA have been shown to closely relate to delayed enhancement of iodinated contrast.24,25 The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability and feasibility of non-contrast CCT scans to detect chronic MI in patients with irreversible perfusion defect on MPI. Chronic MI is characterized by a process of ventricular remodeling, fatty replacement (rarefaction), and in rare cases calcification. Small studies have documented that the presence of fat and/or calcification in the LV-free wall on non-contrast CCT is consistent with MI.16,26,27 Subsequently, areas of infarction are readily apparent on non-contrast CCT as regions of hypo-attenuation either due to reduced capillary density17 or deposition of adipose tissue.15,28 CT imaging features of MI include thin linear or curvilinear fat attenuation within LV myocardium, most commonly sub-endocardial, often associated with LV wall thinning, and/or calcification.16 Furthermore, the presence of LV myocardial fat deposition in sites of myocardial scarring has been reported to be associated with severe heart failure.27 The preliminary results of our study demonstrate that the non-contrast CCT performed for standard CAC scoring has an excellent agreement with MPI in detecting irreversible perfusion defects. Despite a moderate specificity of 72%, CAC showed an excellent sensitivity of 92% to detect irreversible perfusion defects on. The attenuation levels in the infarcted myocardium were lower than the normal myocardium (5.1 ± 18.3 and 46.2 ± 8.2, respectively) and the difference was statistically significant (P < .0001). We also determined the optimal cutoff value for LV myocardium HU to detect chronic MI as 21.7, yielding a sensitivity of 97.4% and specificity of 99.7% based on the ROC curve. This cutoff can be used as an objective method of diagnosing MI on CCT in daily clinical practice with high accuracy (AUC—0.98, 95% CI, 0.96-0.99). CAC score measured through non-contrast CCT scanning has been well validated to predict future coronary events in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.12 This study highlights a novel clinical utility of non-contrast CCT in addition to assessment of overall burden of atherosclerosis measured by CAC, and provides evidence that it can accurately detect chronic MI. We illustrate the importance of complete review of the left ventricle apart from calcium scoring as an addition to the role of non-contrast CT. This application can further be used to detect occult scars in asymptomatic population undergoing CAC scan for risk stratification. Silent or unrecognized MI, which was once thought to be an unusual presentation of CAD, is now widely recognized as a prominent manifestation of the disease process. Past cohort studies have demonstrated that 25%-40% of MIs are clinically unrecognized.29 These asymptomatic infarctions escape detection until ultimately an ECG is performed for screening or other clinical purposes. The true prevalence of unrecognized MI may be even higher, owing to the insensitivity of Q waves.5 Despite its benign clinical presentation the prognosis for unrecognized MI is about as serious as that for recovered symptomatic infarction for all cause and cardiovascular mortality.2 Thus, there is a need for a cost effective screening mechanism for early diagnosis of prior MI to promote early management and potentially improved outcomes. Although other imaging techniques like late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on contrast-enhanced CMR can detect and characterize MI that is missed by clinical history, ECG, conventional wall motion,30,31 or nuclear scintigraphic techniques,32 non-contrast CCT is a less expensive, non-invasive method for detecting unrecognized MI. There is no incremental radiation or scanning required beyond the CAC scan, so one can simultaneously evaluate for both prior MI and CAC with one scan, potentially adding incremental value to the CAC scan at no cost. The presence of LGE on CMR has been shown to provide incremental prognostic value to MACE and cardiac mortality beyond common clinical, angiographic, and functional predictors.33,34 These occult myocardial scars have been associated with a high risk of future cardiac events, and therefore identify a subpopulation of patients who may benefit from more intensive medical or revascularization treatment strategies. Similarly, the presence and extent of MI as detected by a non-contrast CCT could also be a predictor of MACE and cardiac death. The presence of hypo-attenuation may provide incremental prognostic value beyond traditional risk factors and markers of subclinical atherosclerosis. Non-contrast CCT may also represent a better standard for unrecognized MI than ECG for future population-based studies. Whether these findings can result in better patient outcomes by guiding management decisions, such as implantation of ICDs, coronary revascularization, or intensive medical treatment, requires additional study.

Limitation

The primary limitation of this study is that we used irreversible perfusion defects on standard rest MIBI as the reference for detecting chronic MI on CAC scan. However, it should be noted that rest Tc-99m-MIBI underestimates the extent of viable myocardium compared with Tl-201 imaging, and thus some of the irreversible perfusion defects might represent hibernating viable myocardium. Thus, in this study some of the true positives on CAC scan could actually have been false positives. Sublingual administration of NTG before a rest Tc-99m-MIBI study would be a better reference standard with improved assessment of myocardial viability. Although MPI has been validated as an accurate tool to identify the presence of MI, it is known to give a large number of false-positive results, primarily because of attenuation artifacts. Also, smaller infarcts might be underestimated or missed by MPI due to its limited resolution. Thus, some non-contrast CCT scans may have been classified as false negatives or false positives due to false nuclear results. CMR imaging has been proven to be more sensitive than MPI in the detection of small and occult MIs. Therefore, additional studies using CMR with delayed enhancement as the reference standard are warranted.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the non-contrast CCT has an excellent agreement with MPI in detecting chronic MI. Further prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the role of non-contrast CCT in infarct assessment for the management of at-risk patients.
  34 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Prevalence, predisposing factors, and prognosis of clinically unrecognized myocardial infarction in the elderly.

Authors:  S E Sheifer; B J Gersh; N D Yanez; P A Ades; G L Burke; T A Manolio
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Improved detection of myocardial perfusion reversibility by rest-nitroglycerin Tc-99m-MIBI: comparison with TI-201 reinjection.

Authors:  J F Batista; O Pereztol; J A Valdés; E Sánchez; R Stusser; L M Rochela; D López; E V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Visualization of discrete microinfarction after percutaneous coronary intervention associated with mild creatine kinase-MB elevation.

Authors:  M J Ricciardi; E Wu; C J Davidson; K M Choi; F J Klocke; R O Bonow; R M Judd; R J Kim
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Unrecognized myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S E Sheifer; T A Manolio; B J Gersh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function.

Authors:  R J Kim; D S Fieno; T B Parrish; K Harris; E L Chen; O Simonetti; J Bundy; J P Finn; F J Klocke; R M Judd
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study.

Authors:  Anja Wagner; Heiko Mahrholdt; Thomas A Holly; Michael D Elliott; Matthias Regenfus; Michele Parker; Francis J Klocke; Robert O Bonow; Raymond J Kim; Robert M Judd
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Incidence and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction. An update on the Framingham study.

Authors:  W B Kannel; R D Abbott
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-11-01       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Computed tomography demonstration of lipomatous metaplasia of the left ventricle following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Helen T Winer-Muram; Mark Tann; Alex M Aisen; Lincoln Ford; S Gregory Jennings; Robert Bretz
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Adipose tissue in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Leon Su; John E Siegel; Michael C Fishbein
Journal:  Cardiovasc Pathol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.185

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Infarct characterization using CT.

Authors:  Ludovico La Grutta; Patrizia Toia; Erica Maffei; Filippo Cademartiri; Roberto Lagalla; Massimo Midiri
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04

2.  Hypodense regions in unenhanced CT identify nonviable myocardium: validation versus 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Tobias A Fuchs; Jelena R Ghadri; Julia Stehli; Catherine Gebhard; Egle Kazakauskaite; Bernd Klaeser; Oliver Gaemperli; Michael Fiechter; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Artifact-free quantitative cardiovascular PET/MR imaging: An impossible dream?

Authors:  Habib Zaidi; Rene Nkoulou
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  New insight into scar-related ventricular tachycardia circuits in ischemic cardiomyopathy: Fat deposition after myocardial infarction on computed tomography--A pilot study.

Authors:  Takeshi Sasaki; Hugh Calkins; Christopher F Miller; Menekhem M Zviman; Vadim Zipunnikov; Tomio Arai; Motoji Sawabe; Masashiro Terashima; Joseph E Marine; Ronald D Berger; Saman Nazarian; Stefan L Zimmerman
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Field of view of mapping catheters quantified by electrogram associations with radius of myocardial attenuation on contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Satish Misra; Sohail Zahid; Adityo Prakosa; Nissi Saju; Harikrishna Tandri; Ronald D Berger; Joseph E Marine; Hugh Calkins; Vadim Zipunnikov; Natalia Trayanova; Stefan L Zimmerman; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 6.  Myocardial perfusion imaging with cardiac computed tomography: state of the art.

Authors:  Amit R Patel; Nicole M Bhave; Victor Mor-Avi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  Risk stratification of non-contrast CT beyond the coronary calcium scan.

Authors:  Paul Madaj; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2012-08-16

8.  A direct comparison of the sensitivity of CT and MR cardiac perfusion using a myocardial perfusion phantom.

Authors:  James Otton; Geraint Morton; Andreas Schuster; Boris Bigalke; Riccardo Marano; Luca Olivotti; Eike Nagel; Amedeo Chiribiri
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2013-03-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.