CONTEXT: Bureaucratic organisational culture is less favourable to quality improvement, whereas organisations with group (teamwork) culture are better aligned for quality improvement. OBJECTIVE: To determine if an organisational group culture shows better alignment with patient safety climate. DESIGN: Cross-sectional administration of questionnaires. Setting 40 Hospital Corporation of America hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 1406 nurses, ancillary staff, allied staff and physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Competing Values Measure of Organisational Culture, Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Safety Climate Survey (SCSc) and Information and Analysis (IA). RESULTS: The Cronbach alpha was 0.81 for the group culture scale and 0.72 for the hierarchical culture scale. Group culture was positively correlated with SAQ and its subscales (from correlation coefficient r = 0.44 to 0.55, except situational recognition), ScSc (r = 0.47) and IA (r = 0.33). Hierarchical culture was negatively correlated with the SAQ scales, SCSc and IA. Among the 40 hospitals, 37.5% had a hierarchical dominant culture, 37.5% a dominant group culture and 25% a balanced culture. Group culture hospitals had significantly higher safety climate scores than hierarchical culture hospitals. The magnitude of these relationships was not affected after adjusting for provider job type and hospital characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals vary in organisational culture, and the type of culture relates to the safety climate within the hospital. In combination with prior studies, these results suggest that a healthcare organisation's culture is a critical factor in the development of its patient safety climate and in the successful implementation of quality improvement initiatives.
CONTEXT: Bureaucratic organisational culture is less favourable to quality improvement, whereas organisations with group (teamwork) culture are better aligned for quality improvement. OBJECTIVE: To determine if an organisational group culture shows better alignment with patient safety climate. DESIGN: Cross-sectional administration of questionnaires. Setting 40 Hospital Corporation of America hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 1406 nurses, ancillary staff, allied staff and physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Competing Values Measure of Organisational Culture, Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Safety Climate Survey (SCSc) and Information and Analysis (IA). RESULTS: The Cronbach alpha was 0.81 for the group culture scale and 0.72 for the hierarchical culture scale. Group culture was positively correlated with SAQ and its subscales (from correlation coefficient r = 0.44 to 0.55, except situational recognition), ScSc (r = 0.47) and IA (r = 0.33). Hierarchical culture was negatively correlated with the SAQ scales, SCSc and IA. Among the 40 hospitals, 37.5% had a hierarchical dominant culture, 37.5% a dominant group culture and 25% a balanced culture. Group culture hospitals had significantly higher safety climate scores than hierarchical culture hospitals. The magnitude of these relationships was not affected after adjusting for provider job type and hospital characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals vary in organisational culture, and the type of culture relates to the safety climate within the hospital. In combination with prior studies, these results suggest that a healthcare organisation's culture is a critical factor in the development of its patient safety climate and in the successful implementation of quality improvement initiatives.
Authors: Tarik K Yuce; Anthony D Yang; Julie K Johnson; David D Odell; Remi Love; Lindsey Kreutzer; Cary Jo R Schlick; Marina I Zambrano; Ying Shan; Kevin J O'Leary; Amy Halverson; Karl Y Bilimoria Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Barbara Hoffmann; Carolin Miessner; Zeycan Albay; Jakob Schröber; Katrin Weppler; Ferdinand M Gerlach; Corina Güthlin Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2013 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: David D Odell; Christopher M Quinn; Richard S Matulewicz; Julie Johnson; Kathryn E Engelhardt; Jonah J Stulberg; Anthony D Yang; Jane L Holl; Karl Y Bilimoria Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2019-03-09 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Shawna N Smith; Zongshan Lai; Daniel Almirall; David E Goodrich; Kristen M Abraham; Kristina M Nord; Amy M Kilbourne Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Sung Eun Kim; Chan Woong Kim; Sang Jin Lee; Je Hyeok Oh; Dong Hoon Lee; Tae Ho Lim; Hyuk Joong Choi; Hyun Soo Chung; Ji Yeong Ryu; Hye Young Jang; Yoon Hee Choi; Su Jin Kim; Jin Hee Jung Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 2.692