Literature DB >> 21127091

Assessing and improving teamwork in cardiac surgery.

Jan Maarten Schraagen1, Ton Schouten, Meike Smit, Felix Haas, Dolf van der Beek, Josine van de Ven, Paul Barach.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac surgery (PCS) has a low error tolerance, is dependent upon sophisticated organisational structures and demands high levels of cognitive and technical performance. The aim of the study was to assess the role of intraoperative non-routine events (NREs) and team performance on paediatric cardiac surgery outcomes. The current paper focuses on improving methods for studying teamwork; a companion paper will report on the empirical results.
METHODS: The authors trained human factors observers to observe and code the NRE's and teamwork from time of arrival of the patient into the operating room (OR) to the patient handover in the intensive care unit. The observers underwent immersive training in which each observer attended 10 operations, learnt in detail about the technical procedures and clinical tasks and received practice in coding teamwork. Two observers were used interchangeably to observe OR teamwork. The authors instigated a rigorous training and assessment protocol, with independent assessment of their performance by both senior medical and human factors experts using video-based assessment. Real-time teamwork observations were supplemented with process mapping, questionnaires on safety culture, level of preparedness by the team, difficulty of the operation and outcome measures.
RESULTS: 19 PCS cases were observed. The observers observed a total of 255 hr of operations, including the first 10 training cases. We found that 68% of events were observed by one observer but only 32% of all events were observed by both observers. If an event was coded by both observers, 76% was coded in the same way, resulting in high levels of inter-rater agreement. The inter rater reliability of the four main teamwork categories was 91% with Cohen kappa of 0.77. Recommendations were developed for observing teamwork in the operating room, for instance 'train observers on video recordings of real operations (not scripted performance), preferably of at least 1-2 h in duration' and 'Rate teamwork in real time and not afterwards.'
CONCLUSIONS: PCS is an ideal model to explore team performance. A challenge for the future is to make observations of teamwork in healthcare settings more efficient and robust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21127091     DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2009.040105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  13 in total

1.  Applying a Theory-Driven Framework to Guide Quality Improvement Efforts in Nursing Homes: The LOCK Model.

Authors:  Whitney L Mills; Camilla B Pimentel; Jennifer A Palmer; A Lynn Snow; Nancy J Wewiorski; Rebecca S Allen; Christine W Hartmann
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2018-05-08

2.  Patient safety in surgical oncology: perspective from the operating room.

Authors:  Yue-Yung Hu; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 3.  Human factors in robotic assisted surgery: Lessons from studies 'in the Wild'.

Authors:  Ken Catchpole; Ann Bisantz; M Susan Hallbeck; Matthias Weigl; Rebecca Randell; Merrick Kossack; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  A tool to assess nontechnical skills of perfusionists in the cardiac operating room.

Authors:  Roger D Dias; William Riley; Kenneth Shann; Donald S Likosky; David Fitzgerald; Steven Yule
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 5.  Teamwork Assessment Tools in Modern Surgical Practice: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  George Whittaker; Hamid Abboudi; Muhammed Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2015-09-03

6.  Baseline measures of primary health care team functioning and overall primary health care performance at Du Noon Community Health Centre.

Authors:  Shapi Mukiapini; Graham Bresick; Abdul-Rauf Sayed; Cynthia Le Grange
Journal:  Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med       Date:  2018-09-05

7.  Depicting adverse events in cardiac theatre: the preliminary conception of the RECORD model.

Authors:  Haralabos Parissis; Lorraine Mc Grath-Soo; Bassel Al-Alao; Alan Soo
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 1.637

8.  Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol.

Authors:  Rebecca Randell; Joanne Greenhalgh; Jon Hindmarsh; Dawn Dowding; David Jayne; Alan Pearman; Peter Gardner; Julie Croft; Alwyn Kotze
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 9.  Systematic review of methods for quantifying teamwork in the operating theatre.

Authors:  N Li; D Marshall; M Sykes; P McCulloch; J Shalhoub; M Maruthappu
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-02-15

10.  Capturing intraoperative process deviations using a direct observational approach: the glitch method.

Authors:  Lauren Morgan; Eleanor Robertson; Mohammed Hadi; Ken Catchpole; Sharon Pickering; Steve New; Gary Collins; Peter McCulloch
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.