Literature DB >> 21126967

Obstetric outcome after in vitro fertilization with single or double embryo transfer.

Antonina Sazonova1, Karin Källen, Ann Thurin-Kjellberg, Ulla-Britt Wennerholm, Christina Bergh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: IVF children, including singletons, are known to have a poorer obstetric outcome than children born after spontaneous conception. With a broad introduction of single embryo transfer (SET), this scenario might change. This study compares the obstetric outcome after IVF with SET, elective SET (eSET), non elective SET (non-eSET) and double embryo transfer (DET) with outcomes in the general population.
METHODS: All IVF children born in Sweden after IVF treatment during the years 2002-2006 (n = 13 544 children) were included and compared with all non-IVF children born during the same time period (n = 587 009 children). Data were collected from all 16 Swedish IVF clinics and cross-linked with the Swedish Medical Birth Registry. Main outcomes were preterm birth (<28, <32 and <37 w), very-low-birthweight (VLBW) and low-birthweight (LBW). Adjusted odds ratios were calculated.
RESULTS: In total, 7763 children were born after SET and 5724 children after DET. Comparing all SET children, irrespective of multiplicity, with all children in the general population, significantly higher rates of <28 w was found for the IVF children. Comparing IVF singletons, irrespective of SET and DET with non-IVF singletons from the general population, significantly higher rates of <28 w, <37 w, LBW and VLBW were found. eSET singletons, compared with singletons in the general population, had a significantly higher rate of <37 w and non-eSET singletons had significantly higher rates of <28 w and <2500 g births.
CONCLUSIONS: Children born after IVF had a poorer obstetric outcome compared with children from the general population. Singletons, when analysed as one group, irrespective of whether the children were born after eSET, non-eSET or DET, also had a poorer obstetric outcome with higher rates of preterm and LBW compared with singletons in the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21126967     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  22 in total

1.  Fresh and Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Compared to Natural Conception: Differences in Perinatal Outcome.

Authors:  Suzanne Spijkers; Jan Willem Lens; Roel Schats; Cornelis B Lambalk
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Pregnancy complications following fertility treatment-disentangling the role of multiple gestation.

Authors:  Anna Sara Oberg; Tyler J VanderWeele; Catarina Almqvist; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Association of number of retrieved oocytes with live birth rate and birth weight: an analysis of 231,815 cycles of in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Valerie L Baker; Morton B Brown; Barbara Luke; Kirk P Conrad
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Infertility treatment and risk of severe maternal morbidity: a propensity score-matched cohort study.

Authors:  Natalie Dayan; K S Joseph; Deshayne B Fell; Carl A Laskin; Olga Basso; Alison L Park; Jin Luo; Jun Guan; Joel G Ray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  In Vitro fertilization and adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Chantae S Sullivan-Pyke; Suneeta Senapati; Monica A Mainigi; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.300

6.  Brief co-incubation of gametes benefits the outcomes of newborns.

Authors:  Ruiqi Li; Songbang Ou; Nengyong Ouyang; Lingyan Zheng; Qingxue Zhang; Dongzi Yang; Wenjun Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Low birth weight: is it related to assisted reproductive technology or underlying infertility?

Authors:  Laxmi A Kondapalli; Alfredo Perales-Puchalt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Culture media influenced laboratory outcomes but not neonatal birth weight in assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Tai-Lang Yin; Yi Zhang; Sai-Jiao Li; Meng Zhao; Jin-Li Ding; Wang-Ming Xu; Jing Yang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2015-12-16

Review 9.  Long-term follow-up of children conceived through assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Yue-hong Lu; Ning Wang; Fan Jin
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.066

10.  Effect of parental and ART treatment characteristics on perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  M Pontesilli; M H Hof; A C J Ravelli; A J van Altena; A T Soufan; B W Mol; E H Kostelijk; E Slappendel; D Consten; A E P Cantineau; L A J van der Westerlaken; W van Inzen; J C M Dumoulin; L Ramos; E B Baart; F J M Broekmans; P M Rijnders; M H J M Curfs; S Mastenbroek; S Repping; T J Roseboom; R C Painter
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.