BACKGROUND:Coronary stent fracture (SF), is rare and confined mainly in patients treated with sirolimus eluting stents (SES). The role of flat panel digital detector (FPDD) fluoroscopy in detecting SF has not been investigated. METHODS: Assessment with FPDD fluoroscopy of asymptomatic patients, with 200 SES (Cypher, Cordis, J&J, Miami, Florida, US), and 200 bare metal stents (BMS), at 45.5 ± 15.7 and 38.4 ± 3.9 months post-stenting respectively. SF was defined as discontinuity of stent struts on fluoroscopy. Coronary angiography was reserved for patients with documented SF. RESULTS: Effective radiation dose was 0.26 ± 0.14 mSv. SF was depicted in 6 (3%) SES, and 1 BMS (0.5%). Stent length was an independent predictor of SF (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.03-1.4, p=0.024). RCA location and vessel angulation were marginally significant (OR 7.7, 95% CI 0.8-74.2, p=0.077 and OR 5.1, 95% CI 0.8-34, p=0.089). Significant angiographic restenosis was detected in 4 SES (66.6%), and 1 BMS (0.5%). Re-intervention was needed in 3 (42.8%) cases, (2 SES and 1 BMS). CONCLUSION: Detection of SF with FPDD cinefluoroscopy late following coronary stenting is feasible, involves low radiation and is confined mainly to SES compared to BMS. Application of cinefluoroscopy as part of a routine stent surveillance programme in asymptomatic patients may be more appropriate in "high risk" settings (SES, long stents and adverse angiographic characteristics). The role of invasive imaging and subsequent management of such patients need further studying.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Coronary stent fracture (SF), is rare and confined mainly in patients treated with sirolimus eluting stents (SES). The role of flat panel digital detector (FPDD) fluoroscopy in detecting SF has not been investigated. METHODS: Assessment with FPDD fluoroscopy of asymptomatic patients, with 200 SES (Cypher, Cordis, J&J, Miami, Florida, US), and 200 bare metal stents (BMS), at 45.5 ± 15.7 and 38.4 ± 3.9 months post-stenting respectively. SF was defined as discontinuity of stent struts on fluoroscopy. Coronary angiography was reserved for patients with documented SF. RESULTS: Effective radiation dose was 0.26 ± 0.14 mSv. SF was depicted in 6 (3%) SES, and 1 BMS (0.5%). Stent length was an independent predictor of SF (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.03-1.4, p=0.024). RCA location and vessel angulation were marginally significant (OR 7.7, 95% CI 0.8-74.2, p=0.077 and OR 5.1, 95% CI 0.8-34, p=0.089). Significant angiographic restenosis was detected in 4 SES (66.6%), and 1 BMS (0.5%). Re-intervention was needed in 3 (42.8%) cases, (2 SES and 1 BMS). CONCLUSION: Detection of SF with FPDD cinefluoroscopy late following coronary stenting is feasible, involves low radiation and is confined mainly to SES compared to BMS. Application of cinefluoroscopy as part of a routine stent surveillance programme in asymptomatic patients may be more appropriate in "high risk" settings (SES, long stents and adverse angiographic characteristics). The role of invasive imaging and subsequent management of such patients need further studying.