Literature DB >> 21126526

Mechanism of cluster DNA damage repair in response to high-atomic number and energy particles radiation.

Aroumougame Asaithamby1, David J Chen.   

Abstract

Low-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation (i.e., γ- and X-rays) induces DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that are rapidly repaired (rejoined). In contrast, DNA damage induced by the dense ionizing track of high-atomic number and energy (HZE) particles is slowly repaired or is irreparable. These unrepaired and/or misrepaired DNA lesions may contribute to the observed higher relative biological effectiveness for cell killing, chromosomal aberrations, mutagenesis, and carcinogenesis in HZE particle irradiated cells compared to those treated with low-LET radiation. The types of DNA lesions induced by HZE particles have been characterized in vitro and usually consist of two or more closely spaced strand breaks, abasic sites, or oxidized bases on opposing strands. It is unclear why these lesions are difficult to repair. In this review, we highlight the potential of a new technology allowing direct visualization of different types of DNA lesions in human cells and document the emerging significance of live-cell imaging for elucidation of the spatio-temporal characterization of complex DNA damage. We focus on the recent insights into the molecular pathways that participate in the repair of HZE particle-induced DSBs. We also discuss recent advances in our understanding of how different end-processing nucleases aid in repair of DSBs with complicated ends generated by HZE particles. Understanding the mechanism underlying the repair of DNA damage induced by HZE particles will have important implications for estimating the risks to human health associated with HZE particle exposure. 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21126526      PMCID: PMC3318975          DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2010.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  130 in total

Review 1.  Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Moynahan; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Live cell imaging of heavy-ion-induced radiation responses by beamline microscopy.

Authors:  B Jakob; J H Rudolph; N Gueven; M F Lavin; G Taucher-Scholz
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 3.  Ubiquitin and SUMO signalling in DNA repair.

Authors:  Timothy M Thomson; Marta Guerra-Rebollo
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.407

4.  Comparison of several radiation effects in human MCF10A mammary epithelial cells cultured as 2D monolayers or 3D acinar stuctures in matrigel.

Authors:  Yu-Fen Lin; Hatsumi Nagasawa; Yuanlin Peng; Eric Y Chuang; Joel S Bedford
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Molecular dynamics simulation of clustered DNA damage sites containing 8-oxoguanine and abasic site.

Authors:  Hirofumi Fujimoto; Miroslav Pinak; Toshiyuki Nemoto; Peter O'Neill; Etsuo Kume; Kimiaki Saito; Hideaki Maekawa
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 6.  Roles of Werner syndrome protein in protection of genome integrity.

Authors:  Marie L Rossi; Avik K Ghosh; Vilhelm A Bohr
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-01-13

Review 7.  V(D)J recombination deficiencies.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre de Villartay
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Homologous recombination contributes to the repair of DNA double-strand breaks induced by high-energy iron ions.

Authors:  Faria Zafar; Sara B Seidler; Amy Kronenberg; David Schild; Claudia Wiese
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Processing of thymine glycol in a clustered DNA damage site: mutagenic or cytotoxic.

Authors:  Sophie Bellon; Naoya Shikazono; Siobhan Cunniffe; Martine Lomax; Peter O'Neill
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks after low-dose gamma-irradiation.

Authors:  Aroumougame Asaithamby; David J Chen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  51 in total

1.  Direct measurement of the 3-dimensional DNA lesion distribution induced by energetic charged particles in a mouse model tissue.

Authors:  Johanna Mirsch; Francesco Tommasino; Antonia Frohns; Sandro Conrad; Marco Durante; Michael Scholz; Thomas Friedrich; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Resistance of Bacillus subtilis spore DNA to lethal ionizing radiation damage relies primarily on spore core components and DNA repair, with minor effects of oxygen radical detoxification.

Authors:  Ralf Moeller; Marina Raguse; Günther Reitz; Ryuichi Okayasu; Zuofeng Li; Stuart Klein; Peter Setlow; Wayne L Nicholson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Mechanisms and Consequences of Double-Strand DNA Break Formation in Chromatin.

Authors:  Wendy J Cannan; David S Pederson
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Optofluidic cell manipulation for a biological microbeam.

Authors:  Michael Grad; Alan W Bigelow; Guy Garty; Daniel Attinger; David J Brenner
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.523

5.  A branching process model for the analysis of abortive colony size distributions in carbon ion-irradiated normal human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Tetsuya Sakashita; Nobuyuki Hamada; Isao Kawaguchi; Takamitsu Hara; Yasuhiko Kobayashi; Kimiaki Saito
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 6.  Evaluating biomarkers to model cancer risk post cosmic ray exposure.

Authors:  Deepa M Sridharan; Aroumougame Asaithamby; Steve R Blattnig; Sylvain V Costes; Paul W Doetsch; William S Dynan; Philip Hahnfeldt; Lynn Hlatky; Yared Kidane; Amy Kronenberg; Mamta D Naidu; Leif E Peterson; Ianik Plante; Artem L Ponomarev; Janapriya Saha; Antoine M Snijders; Kalayarasan Srinivasan; Jonathan Tang; Erica Werner; Janice M Pluth
Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)       Date:  2016-05-21

Review 7.  Radiation risks associated with serial imaging in colorectal cancer patients: should we worry?

Authors:  Jeong Suk Oh; Jonathan B Koea
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Acute and fractionated exposure to high-LET (56)Fe HZE-particle radiation both result in similar long-term deficits in adult hippocampal neurogenesis.

Authors:  Phillip D Rivera; Hung-Ying Shih; Junie A Leblanc; Mara G Cole; Wellington Z Amaral; Shibani Mukherjee; Shichuan Zhang; Melanie J Lucero; Nathan A Decarolis; Benjamin P C Chen; Amelia J Eisch
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  UV microspot irradiator at Columbia University.

Authors:  Alan W Bigelow; Brian Ponnaiya; Kimara L Targoff; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  56Fe Particle Exposure Results in a Long-Lasting Increase in a Cellular Index of Genomic Instability and Transiently Suppresses Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Vivo.

Authors:  Nathan A DeCarolis; Phillip D Rivera; Francisca Ahn; Wellington Z Amaral; Junie A LeBlanc; Shveta Malhotra; Hung-Ying Shih; David Petrik; Neal Melvin; Benjamin P C Chen; Amelia J Eisch
Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)       Date:  2014-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.