Literature DB >> 11084625

From genotype to phenotype: buffering mechanisms and the storage of genetic information.

S L Rutherford1.   

Abstract

DNA sequence variation is abundant in wild populations. While molecular biologists use genetically homogeneous strains of model organisms to avoid this variation, evolutionary biologists embrace genetic variation as the material of evolution since heritable differences in fitness drive evolutionary change. Yet, the relationship between the phenotypic variation affecting fitness and the genotypic variation producing it is complex. Genetic buffering mechanisms modify this relationship by concealing the effects of genetic and environmental variation on phenotype. Genetic buffering allows the build-up and storage of genetic variation in phenotypically normal populations. When buffering breaks down, thresholds governing the expression of previously silent variation are crossed. At these thresholds, phenotypic differences suddenly appear and are available for selection. Thus, buffering mechanisms modulate evolution and regulate a balance between evolutionary stasis and change. Recent work provides a glimpse of the molecular details governing some types of genetic buffering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11084625     DOI: 10.1002/1521-1878(200012)22:12<1095::AID-BIES7>3.0.CO;2-A

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  67 in total

1.  Cryptic genetic variation promotes rapid evolutionary adaptation in an RNA enzyme.

Authors:  Eric J Hayden; Evandro Ferrada; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Quantitative trait symmetry independent of Hsp90 buffering: distinct modes of genetic canalization and developmental stability.

Authors:  Claire C Milton; Brandon Huynh; Philip Batterham; Suzanne L Rutherford; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Extensive phenotypic variation in early flowering mutants of Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Sylvie Pouteau; Valérie Ferret; Valérie Gaudin; Delphine Lefebvre; Mohammed Sabar; Gengchun Zhao; Franck Prunus
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Antagonistic interactions between the cAMP-dependent protein kinase and Tor signaling pathways modulate cell growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Vidhya Ramachandran; Paul K Herman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Functional interactions among morphologic and tissue quality traits define bone quality.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  From the genetic architecture to synaptic plasticity in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Thomas Bourgeron
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 7.  Stress-induced variation in evolution: from behavioural plasticity to genetic assimilation.

Authors:  Alexander V Badyaev
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Decanalizing thinking on genetic canalization.

Authors:  Kerry Geiler-Samerotte; Federica M O Sartori; Mark L Siegal
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 7.727

9.  Interindividual variation in functionally adapted trait sets is established during postnatal growth and predictable based on bone robustness.

Authors:  Nirnimesh Pandey; Siddharth Bhola; Andrew Goldstone; Fred Chen; Jessica Chrzanowski; Carl J Terranova; Richard Ghillani; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  Does your gene need a background check? How genetic background impacts the analysis of mutations, genes, and evolution.

Authors:  Christopher H Chandler; Sudarshan Chari; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 11.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.