Literature DB >> 23354734

Recombination and synaptic adjustment in oocytes of mice heterozygous for a large paracentric inversion.

Anna A Torgasheva1, Nikolai B Rubtsov, Pavel M Borodin.   

Abstract

Homologous chromosome synapsis in inversion heterozygotes results in the formation of inversion loops. These loops might be transformed into straight, non-homologously paired bivalents via synaptic adjustment. Synaptic adjustment was discovered 30 years ago; however, its relationship with recombination has remained unclear. We analysed this relationship in female mouse embryos heterozygous for large paracentric inversion In(1)1Rk using immunolocalisation of the synaptonemal complex (SYCP3) and mature recombination nodules (MLH1) proteins. The frequency of cells containing bivalents with inversion loops decreased from 69 % to 28 % during pachytene. If an MLH1 focus was present in the non-homologously paired inverted region of the straight bivalent, it was always located in the middle of the inversion. Most of the small, incompletely adjusted loops contained MLH1 foci near the points at which pairing partners were switched. This observation indicates that the degree of synaptic adjustment depended on the crossover position. Complete synaptic adjustment was only possible if a crossover (CO) was located exactly in the middle of the inversion. If a CO was located at any other site, this interrupted synaptic adjustment and resulted in inversion loops of different sizes with an MLH1 focus at or near the edge of the remaining loop.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23354734     DOI: 10.1007/s10577-012-9336-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  43 in total

1.  MicroMeasure: a new computer program for the collection and analysis of cytogenetic data.

Authors:  A Reeves
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.166

2.  [Genetic control of chromosome synapsis in mice heterozygous for a paracentric inversion].

Authors:  P M Borodin; T Iu Ladygina; M I Rodionova; A I Zhelezova; A S Zykovich; T I Aksenovich
Journal:  Genetika       Date:  2005-06

Review 3.  The choice in meiosis - defining the factors that influence crossover or non-crossover formation.

Authors:  Jillian L Youds; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Loop formation and synaptic adjustment in a human male heterozygous for two pericentric inversions.

Authors:  M R Guichaoua; D Delafontaine; R Taurelle; J L Taillemite; M R Morazzani; J M Luciani
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Meiosis in the foetal mouse ovary. II. Oocyte development and age-related aneuploidy. Does a production line exist?

Authors:  R M Speed; A C Chandley
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Involvement of mouse Mlh1 in DNA mismatch repair and meiotic crossing over.

Authors:  S M Baker; A W Plug; T A Prolla; C E Bronner; A C Harris; X Yao; D M Christie; C Monell; N Arnheim; A Bradley; T Ashley; R M Liskay
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 7.  Genetics of mammalian meiosis: regulation, dynamics and impact on fertility.

Authors:  Mary Ann Handel; John C Schimenti
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Further examination of the production-line hypothesis in mouse foetal oocytes. I. Inversion heterozygotes.

Authors:  C Tease; G Fisher
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Electron microscopic investigations of synaptonemal complexes in an infertile human male carrier of a pericentric inversion inv(1)(p32q42). Regular loop formation but defective synapsis including a possible interchromosomal effect.

Authors:  J Batanian; M A Hulten
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Changes in protein composition of meiotic nodules during mammalian meiosis.

Authors:  A W Plug; A H Peters; K S Keegan; M F Hoekstra; P de Boer; T Ashley
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  2 in total

1.  Heterologous synapsis in C. elegans is regulated by meiotic double-strand breaks and crossovers.

Authors:  Hanwenheng Liu; Spencer G Gordon; Ofer Rog
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Meiotic Recombination Analyses in Pigs Carrying Different Balanced Structural Chromosomal Rearrangements.

Authors:  Nicolas Mary; Harmonie Barasc; Stéphane Ferchaud; Aurélia Priet; Anne Calgaro; Anne-Marie Loustau-Dudez; Nathalie Bonnet; Martine Yerle; Alain Ducos; Alain Pinton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.