Literature DB >> 21123821

Engraftment of human central memory-derived effector CD8+ T cells in immunodeficient mice.

Xiuli Wang1, Carolina Berger, ChingLam W Wong, Stephen J Forman, Stanley R Riddell, Michael C Jensen.   

Abstract

In clinical trials of adoptive T-cell therapy, the persistence of transferred cells correlates with therapeutic efficacy. However, properties of human T cells that enable their persistence in vivo are poorly understood, and model systems that enable investigation of the fate of human effector T cells (T(E)) have not been described. Here, we analyzed the engraftment of adoptively transferred human cytomegalovirus pp65-specific CD8(+) T(E) cells derived from purified CD45RO(+)CD62L(+) central memory (T(CM)) or CD45RO(+)CD62L(-) effector memory (T(EM)) precursors in an immunodeficient mouse model. The engraftment of T(CM)-derived effector cells (T(CM/E)) was dependent on human interleukin-15, and superior in magnitude and duration to T(EM)-derived effector cells (T(EM/E)). T-cell receptor Vβ analysis of persisting cells demonstrated that CD8(+) T(CM/E) engraftment was polyclonal, suggesting that the ability to engraft is a general feature of T(CM/E.) CD8(+) T(EM/E) proliferated extensively after transfer but underwent rapid apoptosis. In contrast, T(CM/E) were less prone to apoptosis and established a persistent reservoir of functional T cells in vivo characterized by higher CD28 expression. These studies predict that human CD8(+) effector T cells derived from T(CM) precursors may be preferred for adoptive therapy based on superior engraftment fitness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21123821      PMCID: PMC3056638          DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-10-310599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  30 in total

1.  Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions.

Authors:  F Sallusto; D Lenig; R Förster; M Lipp; A Lanzavecchia
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Lineage relationship and protective immunity of memory CD8 T cell subsets.

Authors:  E John Wherry; Volker Teichgräber; Todd C Becker; David Masopust; Susan M Kaech; Rustom Antia; Ulrich H von Andrian; Rafi Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2003-02-03       Impact factor: 25.606

3.  Adoptively transferred effector cells derived from naive rather than central memory CD8+ T cells mediate superior antitumor immunity.

Authors:  Christian S Hinrichs; Zachary A Borman; Lydie Cassard; Luca Gattinoni; Rosanne Spolski; Zhiya Yu; Luis Sanchez-Perez; Pawel Muranski; Steven J Kern; Carol Logun; Douglas C Palmer; Yun Ji; Robert N Reger; Warren J Leonard; Robert L Danner; Steven A Rosenberg; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The 'cleavage' activities of foot-and-mouth disease virus 2A site-directed mutants and naturally occurring '2A-like' sequences.

Authors:  Michelle L L Donnelly; Lorraine E Hughes; Garry Luke; Heidi Mendoza; Edwin Ten Dam; David Gani; Martin D Ryan
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.891

5.  IL-15 regulates both quantitative and qualitative features of the memory CD8 T cell pool.

Authors:  Michelle M Sandau; Jacob E Kohlmeier; David L Woodland; Stephen C Jameson
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Distribution, persistence, and efficacy of adoptively transferred central and effector memory-derived autologous simian immunodeficiency virus-specific CD8+ T cell clones in rhesus macaques during acute infection.

Authors:  Jacob T Minang; Matthew T Trivett; Diane L Bolton; Charles M Trubey; Jacob D Estes; Yuan Li; Jeremy Smedley; Rhonda Pung; Margherita Rosati; Rashmi Jalah; George N Pavlakis; Barbara K Felber; Michael Piatak; Mario Roederer; Jeffrey D Lifson; David E Ott; Claes Ohlen
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  Adoptive transfer of effector CD8+ T cells derived from central memory cells establishes persistent T cell memory in primates.

Authors:  Carolina Berger; Michael C Jensen; Peter M Lansdorp; Mike Gough; Carole Elliott; Stanley R Riddell
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 8.  Engineering lymphocyte subsets: tools, trials and tribulations.

Authors:  Carl H June; Bruce R Blazar; James L Riley
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 53.106

9.  Generation of EBV-specific CTLs suitable for adoptive immunotherapy of EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disease following allogeneic transplantation.

Authors:  Thomas Hoffmann; Charlotte Russell; Lars Vindelov
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.205

Review 10.  Dissecting the complexity of the memory T cell response.

Authors:  Donna L Farber; Mojgan Ahmadzadeh
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.505

View more
  88 in total

1.  Stem-like tumor-initiating cells isolated from IL13Rα2 expressing gliomas are targeted and killed by IL13-zetakine-redirected T Cells.

Authors:  Christine E Brown; Renate Starr; Brenda Aguilar; Andrew F Shami; Catalina Martinez; Massimo D'Apuzzo; Michael E Barish; Stephen J Forman; Michael C Jensen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Selection bias: maintaining less-differentiated T cells for adoptive immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yang Xu; Gianpietro Dotti
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 3.  Manufacture of tumor- and virus-specific T lymphocytes for adoptive cell therapies.

Authors:  X Wang; I Rivière
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.987

Review 4.  Design and implementation of adoptive therapy with chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells.

Authors:  Michael C Jensen; Stanley R Riddell
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 5.  Human cell-based artificial antigen-presenting cells for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Marcus O Butler; Naoto Hirano
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 6.  Uncoupling T-cell expansion from effector differentiation in cell-based immunotherapy.

Authors:  Joseph G Crompton; Madhusudhanan Sukumar; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.988

7.  Phenotypic and functional attributes of lentivirus-modified CD19-specific human CD8+ central memory T cells manufactured at clinical scale.

Authors:  Xiuli Wang; Araceli Naranjo; Christine E Brown; Cherrilyn Bautista; Chinglam W Wong; Wen-Chung Chang; Brenda Aguilar; Julie R Ostberg; Stanley R Riddell; Stephen J Forman; Michael C Jensen
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 8.  Sorting through subsets: which T-cell populations mediate highly effective adoptive immunotherapy?

Authors:  Christopher A Klebanoff; Luca Gattinoni; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.456

9.  Clinical significance of immunotherapy with combined three kinds of cells for operable colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-Hui Du; Hai-Liang Liu; Li Li; Shao-You Xia; Ning Ning; Zhen-Yu Zou; Da Teng; Chun-Hong Xiao; Rong Li; Ying-Xin Xu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-03-13

10.  Adoptive Transfer of CD8+ T Cells Generated from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Triggers Regressions of Large Tumors Along with Immunological Memory.

Authors:  Hidehito Saito; Keisuke Okita; Alfred E Chang; Fumito Ito
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.