Literature DB >> 19805141

Adoptively transferred effector cells derived from naive rather than central memory CD8+ T cells mediate superior antitumor immunity.

Christian S Hinrichs1, Zachary A Borman, Lydie Cassard, Luca Gattinoni, Rosanne Spolski, Zhiya Yu, Luis Sanchez-Perez, Pawel Muranski, Steven J Kern, Carol Logun, Douglas C Palmer, Yun Ji, Robert N Reger, Warren J Leonard, Robert L Danner, Steven A Rosenberg, Nicholas P Restifo.   

Abstract

Effector cells derived from central memory CD8(+) T cells were reported to engraft and survive better than those derived from effector memory populations, suggesting that they are superior for use in adoptive immunotherapy studies. However, previous studies did not evaluate the relative efficacy of effector cells derived from naïve T cells. We sought to investigate the efficacy of tumor-specific effector cells derived from naïve or central memory T-cell subsets using transgenic or retrovirally transduced T cells engineered to express a tumor-specific T-cell receptor. We found that naïve, rather than central memory T cells, gave rise to an effector population that mediated superior antitumor immunity upon adoptive transfer. Effector cells developed from naïve T cells lost the expression of CD62L more rapidly than those derived from central memory T cells, but did not acquire the expression of KLRG-1, a marker for terminal differentiation and replicative senescence. Consistent with this KLRG-1(-) phenotype, naïve-derived cells were capable of a greater proliferative burst and had enhanced cytokine production after adoptive transfer. These results indicate that insertion of genes that confer antitumor specificity into naïve rather than central memory CD8(+) T cells may allow superior efficacy upon adoptive transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19805141      PMCID: PMC2762661          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0907448106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  41 in total

1.  Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions.

Authors:  F Sallusto; D Lenig; R Förster; M Lipp; A Lanzavecchia
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Lessons from the study of T-cell differentiation in persistent human virus infection.

Authors:  Victor Appay; Sarah L Rowland-Jones
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 11.130

3.  Cytokine-induced differentiation of precursor mouse CD8+ T cells into cytotoxic CD8+ T cells secreting Th1 or Th2 cytokines.

Authors:  S Sad; R Marcotte; T R Mosmann
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 31.745

4.  Acquisition of full effector function in vitro paradoxically impairs the in vivo antitumor efficacy of adoptively transferred CD8+ T cells.

Authors:  Luca Gattinoni; Christopher A Klebanoff; Douglas C Palmer; Claudia Wrzesinski; Keith Kerstann; Zhiya Yu; Steven E Finkelstein; Marc R Theoret; Steven A Rosenberg; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Regression of metastatic renal-cell carcinoma after nonmyeloablative allogeneic peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation.

Authors:  R Childs; A Chernoff; N Contentin; E Bahceci; D Schrump; S Leitman; E J Read; J Tisdale; C Dunbar; W M Linehan; N S Young; A J Barrett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-09-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Central memory self/tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells confer superior antitumor immunity compared with effector memory T cells.

Authors:  Christopher A Klebanoff; Luca Gattinoni; Parizad Torabi-Parizi; Keith Kerstann; Adela R Cardones; Steven E Finkelstein; Douglas C Palmer; Paul A Antony; Sam T Hwang; Steven A Rosenberg; Thomas A Waldmann; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  IL-15 enhances the in vivo antitumor activity of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells.

Authors:  Christopher A Klebanoff; Steven E Finkelstein; Deborah R Surman; Michael K Lichtman; Luca Gattinoni; Marc R Theoret; Navrose Grewal; Paul J Spiess; Paul A Antony; Douglas C Palmer; Yutaka Tagaya; Steven A Rosenberg; Thomas A Waldmann; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Analysis of regulatory CD8 T cells in Qa-1-deficient mice.

Authors:  Dan Hu; Koichi Ikizawa; Linrong Lu; Marie E Sanchirico; Mari L Shinohara; Harvey Cantor
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2004-04-18       Impact factor: 25.606

9.  Lack of proliferative capacity of human effector and memory T cells expressing killer cell lectinlike receptor G1 (KLRG1).

Authors:  David Voehringer; Marie Koschella; Hanspeter Pircher
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-07-12       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Tumor regression and autoimmunity after reversal of a functionally tolerant state of self-reactive CD8+ T cells.

Authors:  Willem W Overwijk; Marc R Theoret; Steven E Finkelstein; Deborah R Surman; Laurina A de Jong; Florry A Vyth-Dreese; Trees A Dellemijn; Paul A Antony; Paul J Spiess; Douglas C Palmer; David M Heimann; Christopher A Klebanoff; Zhiya Yu; Leroy N Hwang; Lionel Feigenbaum; Ada M Kruisbeek; Steven A Rosenberg; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  192 in total

1.  Complementary costimulation of human T-cell subpopulations by cluster of differentiation 28 (CD28) and CD81.

Authors:  Yael Sagi; Angela Landrigan; Ronald Levy; Shoshana Levy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Genetic modification of T cells.

Authors:  Chiara Bonini; Malcolm K Brenner; Helen E Heslop; Richard A Morgan
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Immunotherapy for ovarian cancer: what's next?

Authors:  Lana E Kandalaft; Daniel J Powell; Nathan Singh; George Coukos
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Reducing Ex Vivo Culture Improves the Antileukemic Activity of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cells.

Authors:  J Joseph Melenhorst; Michael C Milone; Saba Ghassemi; Selene Nunez-Cruz; Roddy S O'Connor; Joseph A Fraietta; Prachi R Patel; John Scholler; David M Barrett; Stefan M Lundh; Megan M Davis; Felipe Bedoya; Changfeng Zhang; John Leferovich; Simon F Lacey; Bruce L Levine; Stephan A Grupp; Carl H June
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 11.151

Review 5.  Re-adapting T cells for cancer therapy: from mouse models to clinical trials.

Authors:  Ingunn M Stromnes; Thomas M Schmitt; Aude G Chapuis; Sunil R Hingorani; Philip D Greenberg
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 6.  Design and implementation of adoptive therapy with chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells.

Authors:  Michael C Jensen; Stanley R Riddell
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 7.  A new approach to gene therapy using Sleeping Beauty to genetically modify clinical-grade T cells to target CD19.

Authors:  Harjeet Singh; Helen Huls; Partow Kebriaei; Laurence J N Cooper
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 8.  Human cell-based artificial antigen-presenting cells for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Marcus O Butler; Naoto Hirano
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 9.  Exploiting the curative potential of adoptive T-cell therapy for cancer.

Authors:  Christian S Hinrichs; Steven A Rosenberg
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 10.  Sorting through subsets: which T-cell populations mediate highly effective adoptive immunotherapy?

Authors:  Christopher A Klebanoff; Luca Gattinoni; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.456

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.