BACKGROUND: Advances in the conceptual differentiation of health from disability have not been incorporated in popular measures of perceived health status. The inclusion of function in the measurement of health presents a dilemma for researchers assessing the perceived health of people with functional limitations. OBJECTIVES: The purposes of the present paper are to identify this problem in health measurement, describe its implications for disability and health researchers, and outline potential strategies for future measure development of perceived health status. METHODS: Reflecting the International Classification of Function, Disability, and Health, distinctions among the concepts of health, function, and disability are reviewed. Implications of confounded health measurement are discussed in terms of monitoring health status, assessing health disparities, using health as a mediator or moderator of other outcomes, and assessing effectiveness of interventions. The problem of function confounded with health measurement is illustrated with findings using the SF-36 with persons with spinal cord injury. RESULTS: Recommendations are provided for developing function-neutral measures of perceived health status. CONCLUSION: New measures of perceived health status are needed that do not confound function with health.
BACKGROUND: Advances in the conceptual differentiation of health from disability have not been incorporated in popular measures of perceived health status. The inclusion of function in the measurement of health presents a dilemma for researchers assessing the perceived health of people with functional limitations. OBJECTIVES: The purposes of the present paper are to identify this problem in health measurement, describe its implications for disability and health researchers, and outline potential strategies for future measure development of perceived health status. METHODS: Reflecting the International Classification of Function, Disability, and Health, distinctions among the concepts of health, function, and disability are reviewed. Implications of confounded health measurement are discussed in terms of monitoring health status, assessing health disparities, using health as a mediator or moderator of other outcomes, and assessing effectiveness of interventions. The problem of function confounded with health measurement is illustrated with findings using the SF-36 with persons with spinal cord injury. RESULTS: Recommendations are provided for developing function-neutral measures of perceived health status. CONCLUSION: New measures of perceived health status are needed that do not confound function with health.
Authors: William W Thompson; Matthew M Zack; Gloria L Krahn; Elena M Andresen; John P Barile Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Alexa K Stuifbergen; Marian Morris; Jae Hak Jung; Diana Pierini; Stephanie Morgan Journal: Disabil Health J Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 2.554
Authors: John P Barile; Bryce B Reeve; Ashley Wilder Smith; Matthew M Zack; Sandra A Mitchell; Rosemarie Kobau; David F Cella; Cecily Luncheon; William W Thompson Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2012-08-18 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: John P Barile; Willi Horner-Johnson; Gloria Krahn; Matthew Zack; David Miranda; Kimberly DeMichele; Derek Ford; William W Thompson Journal: Disabil Health J Date: 2016-04-30 Impact factor: 2.554
Authors: Lidia Engel; Stirling Bryan; Silvia M A A Evers; Carmen D Dirksen; Vanessa K Noonan; David G T Whitehurst Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-04-04 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Sarah Derrett; Ari Samaranayaka; Suzanne Wilson; John Langley; Shanthi Ameratunga; Ian D Cameron; Rebbecca Lilley; Emma Wyeth; Gabrielle Davie Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 3.240