PURPOSE: Healthy People 2020 identified health-related quality of life and well-being (WB) as indicators of population health for the next decade. This study examined the measurement properties of the NIH PROMIS(®) Global Health Scale, the CDC Healthy Days items, and associations with the Satisfaction with Life Scale. METHODS: A total of 4,184 adults completed the Porter Novelli's HealthStyles mailed survey. Physical and mental health (9 items from PROMIS Global Scale and 3 items from CDC Healthy days measure), and 4 WB factor items were tested for measurement equivalence using multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: The CDC items accounted for similar variance as the PROMIS items on physical and mental health factors; both factors were moderately correlated with WB. Measurement invariance was supported across gender and age; the magnitude of some factor loadings differed between those with and without a chronic medical condition. CONCLUSIONS: The PROMIS, CDC, and WB items all performed well. The PROMIS items captured a broad range of functioning across the entire continuum of physical and mental health, while the CDC items appear appropriate for assessing burden of disease for chronic conditions and are brief and easily interpretable. All three measures under study appear to be appropriate measures for monitoring several aspects of the Healthy People 2020 goals and objectives.
PURPOSE: Healthy People 2020 identified health-related quality of life and well-being (WB) as indicators of population health for the next decade. This study examined the measurement properties of the NIH PROMIS(®) Global Health Scale, the CDC Healthy Days items, and associations with the Satisfaction with Life Scale. METHODS: A total of 4,184 adults completed the Porter Novelli's HealthStyles mailed survey. Physical and mental health (9 items from PROMIS Global Scale and 3 items from CDC Healthy days measure), and 4 WB factor items were tested for measurement equivalence using multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: The CDC items accounted for similar variance as the PROMIS items on physical and mental health factors; both factors were moderately correlated with WB. Measurement invariance was supported across gender and age; the magnitude of some factor loadings differed between those with and without a chronic medical condition. CONCLUSIONS: The PROMIS, CDC, and WB items all performed well. The PROMIS items captured a broad range of functioning across the entire continuum of physical and mental health, while the CDC items appear appropriate for assessing burden of disease for chronic conditions and are brief and easily interpretable. All three measures under study appear to be appropriate measures for monitoring several aspects of the Healthy People 2020 goals and objectives.
Authors: Willi Horner-Johnson; Rie Suzuki; Gloria L Krahn; Elena M Andresen; Charles E Drum Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2010-05-14 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Thelma Mielenz; Elizabeth Jackson; Shannon Currey; Robert DeVellis; Leigh F Callahan Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2006-09-24 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Jessica R Gorman; H Irene Su; John P Pierce; Samantha C Roberts; Sally A Dominick; Vanessa L Malcarne Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: María J Marquine; Yadira Maldonado; Zvinka Zlatar; Raeanne C Moore; Averria Sirkin Martin; Barton W Palmer; Dilip V Jeste Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2015 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Catherine DeBrosse; Ravi Prakash Reddy Nanga; Neil Wilson; Kevin D'Aquilla; Mark Elliott; Hari Hariharan; Felicia Yan; Kristin Wade; Sara Nguyen; Diana Worsley; Chevonne Parris-Skeete; Elizabeth McCormick; Rui Xiao; Zuela Zolkipli Cunningham; Lauren Fishbein; Katherine L Nathanson; David R Lynch; Virginia A Stallings; Marc Yudkoff; Marni J Falk; Ravinder Reddy; Shana E McCormack Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2016-11-03
Authors: T G Smith; M E Dunn; K Y Levin; S P Tsakraklides; S A Mitchell; L V van de Poll-Franse; K C Ward; C L Wiggins; X C Wu; M Hurlbert; N K Aaronson Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2019-08-09 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Amanda N Szabo-Reed; Eric Vidoni; Ellen F Binder; Jeffrey Burns; C Munro Cullum; William P Gahan; Aditi Gupta; Linda S Hynan; Diana R Kerwin; Heidi Rossetti; Ann M Stowe; Wanpen Vongpatanasin; David C Zhu; Rong Zhang; Jeffrey N Keller Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 2.226