| Literature DB >> 21122104 |
Pedro L C Pinheiro1, João C R Cardoso, Ana S Gomes, Juan Fuentes, Deborah M Power, Adelino V M Canário.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Parathyroid hormone (PTH) and PTH-related peptide (PTHrP) belong to a family of endocrine factors that share a highly conserved N-terminal region (amino acids 1-34) and play key roles in calcium homeostasis, bone formation and skeletal development. Recently, PTH-like peptide (PTH-L) was identified in teleost fish raising questions about the evolution of these proteins. Although PTH and PTHrP have been intensively studied in mammals their function in other vertebrates is poorly documented. Amphibians and birds occupy unique phylogenetic positions, the former at the transition of aquatic to terrestrial life and the latter at the transition to homeothermy. Moreover, both organisms have characteristics indicative of a complex system in calcium regulation. This study investigated PTH family evolution in vertebrates with special emphasis on Xenopus and chicken.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21122104 PMCID: PMC3009671 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-373
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Multiple sequence alignment of the Conserved amino acid positions identified in all vertebrates are indicated by "*" and percentage of sequence similarity in comparison with human PTH and PTHrP and Takifugu PTH-L is given. The typical three amino acid motifs characteristic of each PTH family member in positions 8 to 10 are indicated in black. % similarity to first sequence is indicated on the right. Accession number of the sequences used were: Human (PTH, AAH96144.1; PTHrP, AAA60216); Mouse (PTH, NP_065648; PTHrP, CAC39218.1); Zebrafish (PTHA, NP_998115.1; PTHB, NP_998114.1; PTHrPA, AAY87956.1; PTHrPB, AAY87957.1; PTH-L, CU856139); Takifugu (PTHA, CAG26460.1; PTHB, CAG26461.1; PTHrPA, CAB94712.1; PTHrPB, CAG26459.2; PTH-L, CAG26462.1).
Figure 2Gene organization of the vertebrate PTH-like family members. Exons are represented by boxes and lines indicate introns. Coding (E1 to E4) and non-coding (E1' to E'3) exons are numbered and annotated in bold and italics, respectively. Dotted-filled boxes represent the mature coding regions and black lines box the signal peptide sequence. Arrows represent alternative splice isoforms identified in Xenopus and chicken and previously reported in human. The general organization of the conserved vertebrate PTH gene structure is represented and the size of vertebrate PTHrP and PTH-L precursors is given (amino acids). The length of the chicken PTH-L precursor was predicted in silico and is indicated in italics. Dashed lines indicate incomplete structures that were not confirmed in silico or amplified by RT-PCR. The start of the mature peptide (+1) and the size of the signal peptide for all vertebrate PTH family members is indicated. The localization of the human PTHrP promoter regions (P1, P2 and P3) and the chicken PTHrP putative promoter sites (P1', P2' and P3') and TATA box consensus sequence within the region of P3' are shown. The figure is not drawn to scale and Takifugu A structure was taken from Power et al. [42].
Figure 3Consensus phylogenetic tree of [60]and 1000 bootstraps replicates with the complete amino acid precursor sequence in Mega3.1 software [61]with the settings pairwise deletion, p-distance model and 222 informative sites. Xenopus and chicken PTH family members are in italics and the sequence of human GIP (HsaGIP, NP_004114) was used as outgroup. Human (NP_848544), mouse (NP_444486) and zebrafish (NP_991140) TIP39 mature protein sequences were included for comparative purposes. The accession numbers of other sequences utilized for tree construction are indicated in Figure 1 and seabream PTHrP is AAF79073.
Figure 4Short-range gene linkage comparisons of the PTH family members in the Genes are represented by closed boxes and the size of the chromosome region analysed is given underneath. Genes were named using HUGO and lines indicate chromosome/scaffold segments. The vertebrate PTH family members are in bold and conserved flanking genes identified within the homologue regions are underlined. The PTH gene is localized in Xenopus scaffold_235 and in chicken chromosome 5 and two conserved genes ARNTL and BTBD10 were identified. The Xenopus and chicken PTHrP maps to scaffold_766 and chromosome 1, respectively and the gene MRPS35 was found in close proximity in all vertebrate regions analysed. PTH-L and SFRS3 genes map to Xenopus scaffold_169 and to chicken chromosome 26. SFRS3 was not linked to Takifugu PTH-L and is present on human chromosome 6 which lacks PTH-L. For simplicity, only genes with correspondence across species are represented. The figure is not drawn to scale.
Figure 5Expression of chicken (open bars) and Gene specific primers were used to amplify PTH and PTH-L transcripts and PTHrP spliced isoforms from several tissues. The number of amplified transcripts is presented in relation to 18S copy number and data is presented as mean ± S.E. (n = 2 to 3 for Xenopus and n = 3 for chicken except for pituitary where n = 1).
Variation in bioelectric values of Xenopus abdominal skin and chicken CAM measured in vitro prior and at different times after the basolateral application of 10 nM of Xenopus or chicken PTH(1-34) family peptides.
| Time after hormone application (min) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTH (n = 11) | Isc | 2.49 ± 0.34 | 2.45 ± 0.33 | 2.43 ± 0.32 | 2.44 ± 0.30 | 2.48 ± 0.29 | 2.48 ± 0.30 | 2.49 ± 0.28 |
| Rt | 1143 ± 128 | 1157 ± 129 | 1164 ± 129 | 1130 ± 126 | 1160 ± 127 | 1164 ± 128 | 1167 ± 27 | |
| PTHrP (n = 12) | Isc | 2.59 ± 0.31 | 2.63 ± 0.30 | 2.67 ± 0.29 | 2.74 ± 0.29 | 2.82 ± 0.28 | *2.88 ± 0.27 | *2.91 ± 0.25 |
| Rt | 1329 ± 140 | 1320 ± 122 | 1328 ± 122 | 1276 ± 104 | 1273 ± 98 | 1263 ± 95 | 1264 ± 95 | |
| PTH-L (n = 12) | Isc | 2.36 ± 0.42 | 2.36 ± 0.43 | 2.39 ± 0.42 | 2.44 ± 0.42 | 2.51 ± 0.42 | 2.56 ± 0.43 | *2.59 ± 0.43 |
| Rt | 1332 ± 81 | 1328 ± 75 | 1335 ± 79 | 1318 ± 79 | 1327 ± 78 | 1322 ± 76 | 1335 ± 76 | |
| PTH (n = 11) | Isc | 7.41 ± 1.90 | 7.54 ± 1.84 | 7.39 ± 1.86 | 7.33 ± 1.88 | 7.02 ± 2.00 | 7.14 ± 2.06 | 7.03 ± 2.08 |
| Rt | 190 ± 20 | 191 ± 20 | 194 ± 21 | 196 ± 21 | 191 ± 23 | 194 ± 23 | 196 ± 24 | |
| PTHrP (n = 9) | Isc | 12.53 ± 2.77 | 13.09 ± 2.76 | 13.02 ± 2.74 | 13.05 ± 2.73 | 13.03 ± 2.69 | 13.22 ± 2.76 | 13.06 ± 2.73 |
| Rt | 181 ± 15 | 182 ± 15 | 181 ± 15 | 179 ± 15 | 174 ± 15 | 176 ± 15 | 177 ± 16 | |
| PTH-L (n = 12) | Isc | 7.22 ± 1.26 | 7.37 ± 1.18 | 7.15 ± 1.18 | 6.86 ± 1.10 | 6.75 ± 1.08 | 6.80 ± 1.09 | 6.66 ± 1.10 |
| Rt | 211 ± 21 | 208 ± 20 | 211 ± 20 | 207 ± 21 | 203 ± 20 | 205 ± 20 | 207 ± 30 | |
Note: Isc (μAmp/cm2); Rt (Ω.cm2); * indicates statistically significant difference from time = 0 control (p < 0.05)
Figure 6Calcium fluxes (water to blood side) in Human PTH (1-34) and salmon Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) were used as positive and negative controls respectively. Results are shown as mean ± SEM and the "*" indicates statistical significance compared to control (time 0) (p < 0.05).
Primer pairs (same prefix ending in fw or rv) used to amplify the Xenopus and chicken PTH family members.
| Chicken | ||
|---|---|---|
Note: $ indicates primers for RT-PCR and * indicates primers for q-PCR. For Xenopus PTHrP the same forward primer was used for each pair.