Literature DB >> 21121867

Calibration and comparison of accelerometer cut points in preschool children.

Eveline van Cauwenberghe1, Valery Labarque, Stewart G Trost, Ilse de Bourdeaudhuij, Greet Cardon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to develop accelerometer cut points to classify physical activities (PA) by intensity in preschoolers and to investigate discrepancies in PA levels when applying various accelerometer cut points.
METHODS: To calibrate the accelerometer, 18 preschoolers (5.8 ± 0.4 years) performed eleven structured activities and one free play session while wearing a GT1M ActiGraph accelerometer using 15 s epochs. The structured activities were chosen based on the direct observation system Children's Activity Rating Scale (CARS) while the criterion measure of PA intensity during free play was provided using a second-by-second observation protocol (modified CARS). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to determine the accelerometer cut points. To examine the classification differences, accelerometer data of four consecutive days from 114 preschoolers (5.5 ± 0.3 years) were classified by intensity according to previously published and the newly developed accelerometer cut points. Differences in predicted PA levels were evaluated using repeated measures ANOVA and Chi Square test.
RESULTS: Cut points were identified at 373 counts/15 s for light (sensitivity: 86%; specificity: 91%; Area under ROC curve: 0.95), 585 counts/15 s for moderate (87%; 82%; 0.91) and 881 counts/15 s for vigorous PA (88%; 91%; 0.94). Further, applying various accelerometer cut points to the same data resulted in statistically and biologically significant differences in PA.
CONCLUSIONS: Accelerometer cut points were developed with good discriminatory power for differentiating between PA levels in preschoolers and the choice of accelerometer cut points can result in large discrepancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21121867     DOI: 10.3109/17477166.2010.526223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Obes        ISSN: 1747-7166


  40 in total

1.  Wearables for Pediatric Rehabilitation: How to Optimally Design and Use Products to Meet the Needs of Users.

Authors:  Michele A Lobo; Martha L Hall; Ben Greenspan; Peter Rohloff; Laura A Prosser; Beth A Smith
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2019-06-01

2.  Objectively measured physical activity in European children: the IDEFICS study.

Authors:  K Konstabel; T Veidebaum; V Verbestel; L A Moreno; K Bammann; M Tornaritis; G Eiben; D Molnár; A Siani; O Sprengeler; N Wirsik; W Ahrens; Y Pitsiladis
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Equating accelerometer estimates of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity: in search of the Rosetta Stone.

Authors:  Daniel B Bornstein; Michael W Beets; Wonwoo Byun; Greg Welk; Matteo Bottai; Marsha Dowda; Russell Pate
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 4.319

4.  Association between objectively measured sedentary behavior and body mass index in preschool children.

Authors:  W Byun; J Liu; R R Pate
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 5.095

5.  Prediction of energy expenditure and physical activity in preschoolers.

Authors:  Nancy F Butte; William W Wong; Jong Soo Lee; Anne L Adolph; Maurice R Puyau; Issa F Zakeri
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Cross-sectional time series and multivariate adaptive regression splines models using accelerometry and heart rate predict energy expenditure of preschoolers.

Authors:  Issa F Zakeri; Anne L Adolph; Maurice R Puyau; Firoz A Vohra; Nancy F Butte
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Equating accelerometer estimates among youth: The Rosetta Stone 2.

Authors:  Keith Brazendale; Michael W Beets; Daniel B Bornstein; Justin B Moore; Russell R Pate; Robert G Weaver; Ryan S Falck; Jessica L Chandler; Lars B Andersen; Sigmund A Anderssen; Greet Cardon; Ashley Cooper; Rachel Davey; Karsten Froberg; Pedro C Hallal; Kathleen F Janz; Katarzyna Kordas; Susi Kriemler; Jardena J Puder; John J Reilly; Jo Salmon; Luis B Sardinha; Anna Timperio; Esther M F van Sluijs
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 4.319

Review 8.  Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations.

Authors:  Jairo H Migueles; Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez; Ulf Ekelund; Christine Delisle Nyström; Jose Mora-Gonzalez; Marie Löf; Idoia Labayen; Jonatan R Ruiz; Francisco B Ortega
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Maternal diet quality during pregnancy is associated with biomarkers of metabolic risk among male offspring.

Authors:  Ellen C Francis; Dana Dabelea; Kartik Shankar; Wei Perng
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Patterns of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in preschool children.

Authors:  Eveline Van Cauwenberghe; Rachel A Jones; Trina Hinkley; David Crawford; Anthony D Okely
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.