| Literature DB >> 21120140 |
Linda Douw1, Edwin van Dellen, Johannes C Baayen, Martin Klein, Demetrios N Velis, Willem C J Alpherts, Jan J Heimans, Jaap C Reijneveld, Cornelis Jan Stam.
Abstract
The intra-arterial amobarbital procedure (IAP or Wada test) is used to determine language lateralization and contralateral memory functioning in patients eligible for neurosurgery because of pharmaco-resistant epilepsy. During unilateral sedation, functioning of the contralateral hemisphere is assessed by means of neuropsychological tests. We use the IAP as a reversible model for the effect of lesions on brain network topology. Three artifact-free epochs (4096 samples) were selected from each electroencephalogram record before and after amobarbital injection. Functional connectivity was assessed by means of the synchronization likelihood. The resulting functional connectivity matrices were constructed for all six epochs per patient in four frequency bands, and weighted network analysis was performed. The clustering coefficient, average path length, small-world index, and edge weight correlation were calculated. Recordings of 33 patients were available. Network topology changed significantly after amobarbital injection: clustering decreased in all frequency bands, while path length decreased in the theta and lower alpha band, indicating a shift toward a more random network topology. Likewise, the edge weight correlation decreased after injection of amobarbital in the theta and beta bands. Network characteristics after injection of amobarbital were correlated with memory score: higher theta band small-world index and increased upper alpha path length were related to better memory score. The whole-brain network topology in patients eligible for epilepsy surgery becomes more random and less optimally organized after selective sedation of one hemisphere, as has been reported in studies with brain tumor patients. Furthermore, memory functioning after injection seems related to network topology, indicating that functional performance is related to topological network properties of the brain.Entities:
Keywords: Wada test; brain network; functional connectivity; graph theory; small-world networks
Year: 2010 PMID: 21120140 PMCID: PMC2991225 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Hum Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5161 Impact factor: 3.169
Test statistics of all comparisons between network characteristics before and after injection of amytal.
| Normalized clustering coefficient ( | −3.39 | <0.001* |
| Normalized path length ( | −3.32 | <0.001* |
| Small-world index (S) | −1.81 | 0.07 |
| Edge weight correlation ( | −2.95 | 0.002 |
| Normalized clustering coefficient ( | −2.71 | 0.005* |
| Normalized path length ( | −2.98 | 0.002* |
| Small-world index ( | −0.96 | 0.34 |
| Edge weight correlation ( | −2.01 | 0.044 |
| Normalized clustering coefficient ( | −3.00 | 0.002* |
| Normalized path length ( | −1.76 | 0.08 |
| Small-world index (S) | −1.70 | 0.09 |
| Edge weight correlation ( | −1.48 | 0.14 |
| Normalized clustering coefficient ( | −2.60 | 0.008* |
| Normalized path length ( | −1.56 | 0.12 |
| Small-world index (S) | −1.65 | 0.10 |
| Edge weight correlation ( | −3.31 | <0.001* |
Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used. p-values are before correcting for multiple testing, “*” indicate significance after applying the false discovery rate for controlling chance capitalization.
Figure 1Mean changes in network features after injection of sodium amobarbital. *p < 0.05 (corrected for multiple comparisons). (A) C/C = normalized clustering coefficient, L/L = normalized average path length, S = small-world index. (B) W = edge weight correlation.
Figure 2Example of changes in synchronization from before to after injection of amobarbital in the right hemisphere of one representative subject. (A) Mean changes in synchronization for each electrode with all other electrodes, ΔSL = difference in mean synchronization likelihood between before and after injection of amobarbital. (B–D) Blue line indicates decrease of synchronization likelihood between two electrodes, red line indicates increase. Thickness of lines indicates extent of change after injection (thin = small, thick = large). Three types of edges are depicted: (B) within hemisphere edges, (C) edges between the central (midline) electrodes and the other electrodes, and (D) interhemispheric edges.
Test statistics of variables (lesion type, lesion lateralization, gender) possibly confounding changes in network characteristics.
| Lesion type | Lesion lateralization | Gender | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | 0.94 | 89 | 0.60 | 133 | 0.96 | |
| 96 | 0.30 | 98 | 0.88 | 124 | 0.71 | |
| 91 | 0.22 | 66 | 0.12 | 127 | 0.79 | |
| 111 | 0.64 | 77 | 0.28 | 83.5 | 0.06 | |
| 83 | 0.13 | 87 | 0.53 | 128 | 0.82 | |
| 87.5 | 0.17 | 77.5 | 0.29 | 126 | 0.75 | |
| 107 | 0.54 | 91 | 0.65 | 130 | 0.87 | |
| 115 | 0.73 | 75 | 0.23 | 110.5 | 0.40 | |
| 68.5 | 0.04 | 91 | 0.65 | 112 | 0.42 | |
| 101.5 | 0.41 | 99 | 0.91 | 80 | 0.05 | |
| 100 | 0.37 | 90.5 | 0.61 | 92 | 0.12 | |
| 106 | 0.51 | 91 | 0.64 | 81 | 0.05 | |
| 100 | 0.38 | 93 | 0.71 | 62 | 0.007* | |
| 116.5 | 0.80 | 101 | 0.98 | 80 | 0.05 | |
| 112.5 | 0.68 | 92 | 0.68 | 118 | 0.56 | |
| 88 | 0.19 | 92.5 | 0.69 | 134 | 0.98 | |
Mann–Whitney U-tests were used. p-Values are before correcting for multiple testing, “*” indicate significance after applying the false discovery rate for controlling chance capitalization.
C.
Correlations between memory performance after injection and (changes in) network characteristics.
| Before injection | During injection | Deltascore | |
|---|---|---|---|
| −0.4 (0.77) | 0.25 (0.07) | −0.20 (0.15) | |
| −0.07 (0.60) | 0.01 (0.93) | −0.08 (0.55) | |
| −0.05 (0.74) | 0.30 (0.033)* | −0.27 (0.06) | |
| −0.01 (0.96) | −0.08 (0.56) | 0.05 (0.74) | |
| 0.06 (0.68) | 0.10 (0.48) | −0.06 (0.65) | |
| 0.11 (0.43) | −0.04 (0.76) | 0 (1) | |
| 0.03 (0.81) | 0.13 (0.34) | −0.02 (0.88) | |
| −0.13 (0.37) | −0.14 (0.32) | 0.03 (0.85) | |
| 0.18 (0.19) | 0.17 (0.24) | 0.06 (0.65) | |
| 0.14 (0.31) | 0.31 (0.026)* | −0.02 (0.87) | |
| 0.02 (0.87) | −0.03 (0.85) | 0.07 (0.63) | |
| 0.05 (0.71) | −0.23 (0.10) | 0.15 (0.28) | |
| −0.11 (0.42) | 0.18 (0.19) | −0.20 (0.15) | |
| −0.09 (0.53) | 0.11 (0.43) | −0.21 (0.13) | |
| 0.01 (0.97) | 0.07 (0.63) | 0.02 (0.88) | |
| 0.05 (0.71) | −0.03 (0.82) | 0.10 (0.47) | |
Correlations between memory performance after injection and (changes in) network characteristics: Kendall's tau (p-value). Before injection = network characteristics during rest, before injection of amobarbital, During injection = network characteristics during unilateral sedation, Deltascore = network characteristic value after injection subtracted from network characteristic before injection, C.
Figure 3Scatterplots of correlations between network variables and memory performance during the IAP. (A) Correlation between theta band small-worldness (S) and memory score. (B) Correlation between upper alpha band path length and memory score.