| Literature DB >> 21119896 |
Justin B Leaf1, Jan B Sheldon, James A Sherman.
Abstract
This study compared no-no prompting procedures to simultaneous prompting procedures for 3 children with autism. Using a parallel treatments design, researchers taught rote math skills, receptive labels, or answers to "wh-" questions with both prompting systems. Results indicated that no-no prompting was effective in teaching all skills. By contrast, simultaneous prompting was effective in teaching only one pair of skills to 1 participant in the same amount of teaching time and trials. Researchers conducted a preference assessment to determine which of the two prompting procedures the 3 participants preferred. The participants showed mixed preferences for the two procedures.Entities:
Keywords: autism; discrete-trial teaching; no-no prompting; simultaneous prompting
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21119896 PMCID: PMC2884346 DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-215
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Behav Anal ISSN: 0021-8855