OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in an enlarged series of uterine serous carcinoma (USC) patients and to determine whether patients with USC are associated with a personal or familial history of breast or ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: A cohort of all consecutive patients with diagnosed USC was identified for 9 years. Family pedigrees were drawn as far back and laterally as possible. In all patients, genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples and analyzed for the 3 mutations common in Ashkenazi Jewish patients. All patients went through total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and omentectomy. Tubal, ovarian, and peritoneal carcinoma were ruled out clinically and pathologically in all patients. RESULTS: Of 51 consecutive patients with USC in Ashkenazi Jews studied, we identified 13 patients (25.5%) who were previously found to have breast carcinoma, 17 patients (33.3%) who had a first-degree relative with breast or ovarian carcinoma, and 8 patients (15.7%) who were found to be carriers of 1 of the 3 BRCA germline mutations. CONCLUSIONS: This series of USC patients, the largest consecutive series to date, suggests a higher incidence of BRCA carriers among Ashkenazi Jews as compared with the general population. This high rate of BRCA germline mutations in USC patients coupled with a high rate of personal and familial cancer histories may suggest that USC is associated with the hereditary breast-ovarian syndrome. This potential association of USC to the BRCA-associated cancer spectrum may have implications for the clinical management and intervention of unaffected BRCA1-2 germline mutation carriers. However, at the current time, there are insufficient data to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the optimal timing or specific intervention to prevent cancers in these high-risk women.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in an enlarged series of uterine serous carcinoma (USC) patients and to determine whether patients with USC are associated with a personal or familial history of breast or ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: A cohort of all consecutive patients with diagnosed USC was identified for 9 years. Family pedigrees were drawn as far back and laterally as possible. In all patients, genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples and analyzed for the 3 mutations common in Ashkenazi Jewish patients. All patients went through total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and omentectomy. Tubal, ovarian, and peritoneal carcinoma were ruled out clinically and pathologically in all patients. RESULTS: Of 51 consecutive patients with USC in Ashkenazi Jews studied, we identified 13 patients (25.5%) who were previously found to have breast carcinoma, 17 patients (33.3%) who had a first-degree relative with breast or ovarian carcinoma, and 8 patients (15.7%) who were found to be carriers of 1 of the 3 BRCA germline mutations. CONCLUSIONS: This series of USC patients, the largest consecutive series to date, suggests a higher incidence of BRCA carriers among Ashkenazi Jews as compared with the general population. This high rate of BRCA germline mutations in USC patients coupled with a high rate of personal and familial cancer histories may suggest that USC is associated with the hereditary breast-ovarian syndrome. This potential association of USC to the BRCA-associated cancer spectrum may have implications for the clinical management and intervention of unaffected BRCA1-2 germline mutation carriers. However, at the current time, there are insufficient data to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the optimal timing or specific intervention to prevent cancers in these high-risk women.
Authors: Yakir Segev; Barry Rosen; Jan Lubinski; Jacek Gronwald; Henry T Lynch; Pal Moller; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Parviz Ghadirian; Beth Karlan; Charis Eng; Dawna Gilchrist; Susan L Neuhausen; Andrea Eisen; Eitan Friedman; David Euhus; Sun Ping; Steven A Narod Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Kathryn P Pennington; Tom Walsh; Ming Lee; Christopher Pennil; Akiva P Novetsky; Kathy J Agnew; Anne Thornton; Rochelle Garcia; David Mutch; Mary-Claire King; Paul Goodfellow; Elizabeth M Swisher Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-07-18 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Louise A Brinton; Ashley S Felix; D Scott McMeekin; William T Creasman; Mark E Sherman; David Mutch; David E Cohn; Joan L Walker; Richard G Moore; Levi S Downs; Robert A Soslow; Richard Zaino Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Kari L Ring; Amanda S Bruegl; Brian A Allen; Eric P Elkin; Nanda Singh; Anne-Renee Hartman; Molly S Daniels; Russell R Broaddus Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Murray Joseph Casey; Chhanda Bewtra; Henry T Lynch; Carrie Snyder; Mark Stacy; Patrice Watson Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Hannah P Yang; Nicolas Wentzensen; Britton Trabert; Gretchen L Gierach; Ashley S Felix; Marc J Gunter; Albert Hollenbeck; Yikyung Park; Mark E Sherman; Louise A Brinton Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Mark E Sherman; Marion Piedmonte; Phuong L Mai; Olga B Ioffe; Brigitte M Ronnett; Linda Van Le; Iouri Ivanov; Maria C Bell; Stephanie V Blank; Paul DiSilvestro; Chad A Hamilton; Krishnansu S Tewari; Katie Wakeley; Noah D Kauff; S Diane Yamada; Gustavo Rodriguez; Steven J Skates; David S Alberts; Joan L Walker; Lori Minasian; Karen Lu; Mark H Greene Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-09-08 Impact factor: 44.544