Literature DB >> 21119368

BRCA germline mutations in women with uterine serous carcinoma--still a debate.

Ofer Lavie1, Alon Ben-Arie, Yakir Segev, Jonathan Faro, Frida Barak, Nir Haya, Ron Auslender, Ofer Gemer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in an enlarged series of uterine serous carcinoma (USC) patients and to determine whether patients with USC are associated with a personal or familial history of breast or ovarian carcinoma.
METHODS: A cohort of all consecutive patients with diagnosed USC was identified for 9 years. Family pedigrees were drawn as far back and laterally as possible. In all patients, genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples and analyzed for the 3 mutations common in Ashkenazi Jewish patients. All patients went through total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and omentectomy. Tubal, ovarian, and peritoneal carcinoma were ruled out clinically and pathologically in all patients.
RESULTS: Of 51 consecutive patients with USC in Ashkenazi Jews studied, we identified 13 patients (25.5%) who were previously found to have breast carcinoma, 17 patients (33.3%) who had a first-degree relative with breast or ovarian carcinoma, and 8 patients (15.7%) who were found to be carriers of 1 of the 3 BRCA germline mutations.
CONCLUSIONS: This series of USC patients, the largest consecutive series to date, suggests a higher incidence of BRCA carriers among Ashkenazi Jews as compared with the general population. This high rate of BRCA germline mutations in USC patients coupled with a high rate of personal and familial cancer histories may suggest that USC is associated with the hereditary breast-ovarian syndrome. This potential association of USC to the BRCA-associated cancer spectrum may have implications for the clinical management and intervention of unaffected BRCA1-2 germline mutation carriers. However, at the current time, there are insufficient data to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the optimal timing or specific intervention to prevent cancers in these high-risk women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21119368     DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181cd242f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  23 in total

1.  Risk factors for endometrial cancer among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: a case control study.

Authors:  Yakir Segev; Barry Rosen; Jan Lubinski; Jacek Gronwald; Henry T Lynch; Pal Moller; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Parviz Ghadirian; Beth Karlan; Charis Eng; Dawna Gilchrist; Susan L Neuhausen; Andrea Eisen; Eitan Friedman; David Euhus; Sun Ping; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  The emerging genomic landscape of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Matthieu Le Gallo; Daphne W Bell
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  BRCA1, TP53, and CHEK2 germline mutations in uterine serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Kathryn P Pennington; Tom Walsh; Ming Lee; Christopher Pennil; Akiva P Novetsky; Kathy J Agnew; Anne Thornton; Rochelle Garcia; David Mutch; Mary-Claire King; Paul Goodfellow; Elizabeth M Swisher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Müllerian intra-abdominal carcinomatosis in hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome: implications for risk-reducing surgery.

Authors:  Murray Joseph Casey; Agnes B Colanta
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Etiologic heterogeneity in endometrial cancer: evidence from a Gynecologic Oncology Group trial.

Authors:  Louise A Brinton; Ashley S Felix; D Scott McMeekin; William T Creasman; Mark E Sherman; David Mutch; David E Cohn; Joan L Walker; Richard G Moore; Levi S Downs; Robert A Soslow; Richard Zaino
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Germline multi-gene hereditary cancer panel testing in an unselected endometrial cancer cohort.

Authors:  Kari L Ring; Amanda S Bruegl; Brian A Allen; Eric P Elkin; Nanda Singh; Anne-Renee Hartman; Molly S Daniels; Russell R Broaddus
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 7.  [Pitfalls in the histopathological diagnostics of endometrial carcinoma and its precursors : Clinically relevant differential diagnoses, avoidance of false positive diagnoses].

Authors:  F Kommoss; S F Lax
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.011

8.  Phenotypic heterogeneity of hereditary gynecologic cancers: a report from the Creighton hereditary cancer registry.

Authors:  Murray Joseph Casey; Chhanda Bewtra; Henry T Lynch; Carrie Snyder; Mark Stacy; Patrice Watson
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Endometrial cancer risk factors by 2 main histologic subtypes: the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study.

Authors:  Hannah P Yang; Nicolas Wentzensen; Britton Trabert; Gretchen L Gierach; Ashley S Felix; Marc J Gunter; Albert Hollenbeck; Yikyung Park; Mark E Sherman; Louise A Brinton
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Pathologic findings at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: primary results from Gynecologic Oncology Group Trial GOG-0199.

Authors:  Mark E Sherman; Marion Piedmonte; Phuong L Mai; Olga B Ioffe; Brigitte M Ronnett; Linda Van Le; Iouri Ivanov; Maria C Bell; Stephanie V Blank; Paul DiSilvestro; Chad A Hamilton; Krishnansu S Tewari; Katie Wakeley; Noah D Kauff; S Diane Yamada; Gustavo Rodriguez; Steven J Skates; David S Alberts; Joan L Walker; Lori Minasian; Karen Lu; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.