OBJECTIVE: Although the epidemiology of typical endometrial carcinomas (grades 1-2 endometrioid or Type I) is well established, less is known regarding higher grade endometrioid or non-endometrioid carcinomas (Type II). Within a large Gynecologic Oncology Group trial (GOG-210), which included central pathology review, we investigated the etiologic heterogeneity of endometrial cancers by comparing risk factors for different histologic categories. METHODS: Based on epidemiologic questionnaire data, risk factor associations, expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were estimated comparing grade 3 endometrioid and Type II cancers (including histologic subtypes) to grades 1-2 endometrioid cancers. RESULTS: Compared with 2244 grades 1-2 endometrioid cancers, women with Type II cancers (321 serous, 141 carcinosarcomas, 77 clear cell, 42 mixed epithelial with serous or clear cell components) were older; more often non-white, multiparous, current smokers; and less often obese. Risk factors for grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas (n=354) were generally similar to those identified for Type II cancers, although patients with grade 3 endometrioid tumors more often had histories of breast cancer without tamoxifen exposure while those with Type II tumors were more frequently treated with tamoxifen. Patients with serous cancers and carcinosarcomas more frequently had breast cancer histories with tamoxifen treatment compared to patients with other tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for aggressive endometrial cancers, including grade 3 endometrioid and non-endometrioid tumors, appear to differ from lower grade endometrioid carcinomas. Our findings support etiologic differences between Type I and II endometrial cancers as well as additional heterogeneity within Type II cancers. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVE: Although the epidemiology of typical endometrial carcinomas (grades 1-2 endometrioid or Type I) is well established, less is known regarding higher grade endometrioid or non-endometrioid carcinomas (Type II). Within a large Gynecologic Oncology Group trial (GOG-210), which included central pathology review, we investigated the etiologic heterogeneity of endometrial cancers by comparing risk factors for different histologic categories. METHODS: Based on epidemiologic questionnaire data, risk factor associations, expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were estimated comparing grade 3 endometrioid and Type II cancers (including histologic subtypes) to grades 1-2 endometrioid cancers. RESULTS: Compared with 2244 grades 1-2 endometrioid cancers, women with Type II cancers (321 serous, 141 carcinosarcomas, 77 clear cell, 42 mixed epithelial with serous or clear cell components) were older; more often non-white, multiparous, current smokers; and less often obese. Risk factors for grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas (n=354) were generally similar to those identified for Type II cancers, although patients with grade 3 endometrioid tumors more often had histories of breast cancer without tamoxifen exposure while those with Type II tumors were more frequently treated with tamoxifen. Patients with serous cancers and carcinosarcomas more frequently had breast cancer histories with tamoxifen treatment compared to patients with other tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for aggressive endometrial cancers, including grade 3 endometrioid and non-endometrioid tumors, appear to differ from lower grade endometrioid carcinomas. Our findings support etiologic differences between Type I and II endometrial cancers as well as additional heterogeneity within Type II cancers. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Kathryn P Pennington; Tom Walsh; Ming Lee; Christopher Pennil; Akiva P Novetsky; Kathy J Agnew; Anne Thornton; Rochelle Garcia; David Mutch; Mary-Claire King; Paul Goodfellow; Elizabeth M Swisher Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-07-18 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Brian M Slomovitz; Thomas W Burke; Patricia J Eifel; Lois M Ramondetta; Elvio G Silva; Anuja Jhingran; Jonathan C Oh; E Neely Atkinson; Russell R Broaddus; David M Gershenson; Karen H Lu Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Paola A Gehrig; Victoria L Bae-Jump; John F Boggess; Pamela A Groben; Wesley C Fowler; Linda Van Le Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Theodore M Brasky; Todd R Sponholtz; Julie R Palmer; Lynn Rosenberg; Edward A Ruiz-Narváez; Lauren A Wise Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2016-01-10 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Abigail D Winder; Kruti P Maniar; Jian-Jun Wei; Dachao Liu; Denise M Scholtens; John R Lurain; Julian C Schink; Barbara M Buttin; Virginia L Filiaci; Heather A Lankes; Nilsa C Ramirez; Kay Park; Meenakshi Singh; Richard W Lieberman; Robert S Mannel; Matthew A Powell; Floor J Backes; Cara A Mathews; Michael L Pearl; Angeles Alvarez Secord; David J Peace; David G Mutch; William T Creasman; J Julie Kim Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Casey M Cosgrove; David L Tritchler; David E Cohn; David G Mutch; Craig M Rush; Heather A Lankes; William T Creasman; David S Miller; Nilsa C Ramirez; Melissa A Geller; Matthew A Powell; Floor J Backes; Lisa M Landrum; Cynthia Timmers; Adrian A Suarez; Richard J Zaino; Michael L Pearl; Paul A DiSilvestro; Shashikant B Lele; Paul J Goodfellow Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-11-11 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Jennifer Rhoades; Monica Hagan Vetter; James L Fisher; David E Cohn; Ritu Salani; Ashley S Felix Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Britton Trabert; Nicolas Wentzensen; Ashley S Felix; Hannah P Yang; Mark E Sherman; Louise A Brinton Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Ashley S Felix; David E Cohn; Theodore M Brasky; Richard Zaino; Kay Park; David G Mutch; William T Creasman; Premal H Thaker; Joan L Walker; Richard G Moore; Shashikant B Lele; Saketh R Guntupalli; Levi S Downs; Christa I Nagel; John F Boggess; Michael L Pearl; Olga B Ioffe; Marcus E Randall; Louise A Brinton Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: D Scott McMeekin; David L Tritchler; David E Cohn; David G Mutch; Heather A Lankes; Melissa A Geller; Matthew A Powell; Floor J Backes; Lisa M Landrum; Richard Zaino; Russell D Broaddus; Nilsa Ramirez; Feng Gao; Shamshad Ali; Kathleen M Darcy; Michael L Pearl; Paul A DiSilvestro; Shashikant B Lele; Paul J Goodfellow Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Louise A Brinton; Britton Trabert; Garnet L Anderson; Roni T Falk; Ashley S Felix; Barbara J Fuhrman; Margery L Gass; Lewis H Kuller; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Thomas E Rohan; Howard D Strickler; Xia Xu; Nicolas Wentzensen Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 4.254