BACKGROUND: Although a known risk factor for several respiratory diseases, the relationship between cooking smoke and tuberculosis has not been conclusively established. Hence, a case-control study was conducted among adult women of Chandigarh Union Territory in India. METHODS: Physician-diagnosed cases of sputum positive pulmonary tuberculosis (n=126) and age- and residence area-matched controls (n=252) were enrolled from clinics in urban, rural and slum areas. Interviews were conducted in the clinic using a pretested questionnaire to collect information on type of cooking fuel, education, occupation, socio-economic status, smoking, overcrowding and type of kitchen, etc. The conditional logistic regression model was used for control of confounding. RESULTS: The study population was predominantly in the 20-29-year-old age group (58%) and lived in urban areas (67%). The majority were illiterate (52%) and housewives (93%), and nearly half (46%) had an income of no more than Rs 25 000. Among the cases, 20.6%, 27% and 52.4% used biomass fuel, kerosene and liquid petroleum gas (LPG), respectively, whereas among controls, the respective figures were: 12.3%, 26.2% and 61.5%. The unadjusted OR for biomass fuel compared with LPG was 2.33 (95% CI 1.18 to 4.59, p 0.01). Adjustment for confounding factors (education, type of kitchen, smoking tobacco and TB in a family member) and interaction between cooking fuel and smoker in family revealed an OR of 3.14 (95% CI 1.15 to 8.56, p=0.02) for biomass fuel in comparison with LPG. CONCLUSIONS: Cooking with biomass fuel increases the risk for pulmonary tuberculosis.
BACKGROUND: Although a known risk factor for several respiratory diseases, the relationship between cooking smoke and tuberculosis has not been conclusively established. Hence, a case-control study was conducted among adult women of Chandigarh Union Territory in India. METHODS: Physician-diagnosed cases of sputum positive pulmonary tuberculosis (n=126) and age- and residence area-matched controls (n=252) were enrolled from clinics in urban, rural and slum areas. Interviews were conducted in the clinic using a pretested questionnaire to collect information on type of cooking fuel, education, occupation, socio-economic status, smoking, overcrowding and type of kitchen, etc. The conditional logistic regression model was used for control of confounding. RESULTS: The study population was predominantly in the 20-29-year-old age group (58%) and lived in urban areas (67%). The majority were illiterate (52%) and housewives (93%), and nearly half (46%) had an income of no more than Rs 25 000. Among the cases, 20.6%, 27% and 52.4% used biomass fuel, kerosene and liquid petroleum gas (LPG), respectively, whereas among controls, the respective figures were: 12.3%, 26.2% and 61.5%. The unadjusted OR for biomass fuel compared with LPG was 2.33 (95% CI 1.18 to 4.59, p 0.01). Adjustment for confounding factors (education, type of kitchen, smoking tobacco and TB in a family member) and interaction between cooking fuel and smoker in family revealed an OR of 3.14 (95% CI 1.15 to 8.56, p=0.02) for biomass fuel in comparison with LPG. CONCLUSIONS: Cooking with biomass fuel increases the risk for pulmonary tuberculosis.
Authors: Michael N Bates; Karl Pope; Tula Ram Sijali; Amod K Pokhrel; Ajay Pillarisetti; Nicholas L Lam; Sharat C Verma Journal: Environ Res Date: 2018-09-27 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: J Jubulis; A Kinikar; M Ithape; M Khandave; S Dixit; S Hotalkar; V Kulkarni; V Mave; N Gupte; A Kagal; S Jain; R Bharadwaj; A Gupta Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Stephen B Gordon; Nigel G Bruce; Jonathan Grigg; Patricia L Hibberd; Om P Kurmi; Kin-bong Hubert Lam; Kevin Mortimer; Kwaku Poku Asante; Kalpana Balakrishnan; John Balmes; Naor Bar-Zeev; Michael N Bates; Patrick N Breysse; Sonia Buist; Zhengming Chen; Deborah Havens; Darby Jack; Surinder Jindal; Haidong Kan; Sumi Mehta; Peter Moschovis; Luke Naeher; Archana Patel; Rogelio Perez-Padilla; Daniel Pope; Jamie Rylance; Sean Semple; William J Martin Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2014-09-02 Impact factor: 30.700