Literature DB >> 21117749

Effect of stimulus level and place of stimulation on temporal pitch perception by cochlear implant users.

Robert P Carlyon1, Catherine Lynch, John M Deeks.   

Abstract

Three experiments studied the effect of pulse rate on temporal pitch perception by cochlear implant users. Experiment 1 measured rate discrimination for pulse trains presented in bipolar mode to either an apical, middle, or basal electrode and for standard rates of 100 and 200 pps. In each block of trials the signals could have a level of -0.35, 0, or +0.35 dB re the standard, and performance for each signal level was recorded separately. Signal level affected performance for just over half of the combinations of subject, electrode, and standard rate studied. Performance was usually, but not always, better at the higher signal level. Experiment 2 showed that, for a given subject and condition, the direction of the effect was similar in monopolar and bipolar mode. Experiment 3 employed a pitch comparison procedure without feedback, and showed that the signal levels in experiment 1 that produced the best performance for a given subject and condition also led to the signal having a higher pitch. It is concluded that small level differences can have a robust and substantial effect on pitch judgments and argue that these effects are not entirely due to response biases or to co-variation of place-of-excitation with level.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21117749     DOI: 10.1121/1.3372711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Is there a fundamental 300 Hz limit to pulse rate discrimination in cochlear implants?

Authors:  Pieter J Venter; Johan J Hanekom
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-19

2.  Temporal-pitch sensitivity in electric hearing with amplitude modulation and inserted pulses with short inter-pulse intervals.

Authors:  Martin J Lindenbeck; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Sridhar Srinivasan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Extending the limits of place and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; John M Deeks; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-30

4.  A Comparison of Place-Pitch-Based Interaural Electrode Matching Methods for Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Kenneth K Jensen; Stefano Cosentino; Joshua G W Bernstein; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Envelope Interactions in Multi-Channel Amplitude Modulation Frequency Discrimination by Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Sandra I Oba; Deniz Başkent; Monita Chatterjee; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of signal and gap-detection thresholds for focused and broad cochlear implant electrode configurations.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John M Deeks; Alexander J Billig; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-03

7.  Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.

Authors:  Benjamin Krüger; Andreas Büchner; Waldo Nogueira
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Temporal Regularity Detection and Rate Discrimination in Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; John M Deeks; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.