AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The Diabetes Reduction Assessment with Ramipril and Rosiglitazone Medication (DREAM) trial reported that 3 years of therapy with rosiglitazone reduced the primary outcome of diabetes or death by 60%. Here we investigated whether an effect on diabetes prevention persists more than 1.5 years after therapy has been discontinued. METHODS: The DREAM On passive follow-up study was conducted at 49 of the 191 DREAM sites. Consenting participants were invited to have a repeat OGTT 1-2 years after active therapy ended. A diagnosis of diabetes at that time was based on either a fasting or 2 h plasma glucose level of ≥7.0 mmol/l or ≥11.1 mmol/l, respectively, or a confirmed diagnosis by a non-study physician. Regression to normoglycaemia was defined as a fasting and 2 h plasma glucose level of <6.1 mmol/l and <7.8 mmol/l, respectively. RESULTS: After a median of 1.6 years after the end of the trial and 4.3 years after randomisation, rosiglitazone participants had a 39% lower incidence of the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.53-0.70; p < 0.0001) and 17% more regression to normoglycaemia (95% CI 1.01-1.34; p = 0.034). When the analysis was restricted to the passive follow-up period, a similar incidence of both the primary outcome and regression was observed in people from both treatment groups (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.81-1.24 and HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.97-1.32, respectively). Similar effects were noted when new diabetes was analysed separately from death. Ramipril did not have any significant long-term effect. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Time-limited exposure to rosiglitazone reduces the longer term incidence of diabetes by delaying but not reversing the underlying disease process.
RCT Entities:
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The Diabetes Reduction Assessment with Ramipril and Rosiglitazone Medication (DREAM) trial reported that 3 years of therapy with rosiglitazone reduced the primary outcome of diabetes or death by 60%. Here we investigated whether an effect on diabetes prevention persists more than 1.5 years after therapy has been discontinued. METHODS: The DREAM On passive follow-up study was conducted at 49 of the 191 DREAM sites. Consenting participants were invited to have a repeat OGTT 1-2 years after active therapy ended. A diagnosis of diabetes at that time was based on either a fasting or 2 h plasma glucose level of ≥7.0 mmol/l or ≥11.1 mmol/l, respectively, or a confirmed diagnosis by a non-study physician. Regression to normoglycaemia was defined as a fasting and 2 h plasma glucose level of <6.1 mmol/l and <7.8 mmol/l, respectively. RESULTS: After a median of 1.6 years after the end of the trial and 4.3 years after randomisation, rosiglitazoneparticipants had a 39% lower incidence of the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.53-0.70; p < 0.0001) and 17% more regression to normoglycaemia (95% CI 1.01-1.34; p = 0.034). When the analysis was restricted to the passive follow-up period, a similar incidence of both the primary outcome and regression was observed in people from both treatment groups (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.81-1.24 and HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.97-1.32, respectively). Similar effects were noted when new diabetes was analysed separately from death. Ramipril did not have any significant long-term effect. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Time-limited exposure to rosiglitazone reduces the longer term incidence of diabetes by delaying but not reversing the underlying disease process.
Authors: William C Knowler; Richard F Hamman; Sharon L Edelstein; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; David A Ehrmann; Elizabeth A Walker; Sarah E Fowler; David M Nathan; Steven E Kahn Journal: Diabetes Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: H C Gerstein; S Yusuf; J Bosch; J Pogue; P Sheridan; N Dinccag; M Hanefeld; B Hoogwerf; M Laakso; V Mohan; J Shaw; B Zinman; R R Holman Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-09-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jackie Bosch; Salim Yusuf; Hertzel C Gerstein; Janice Pogue; Patrick Sheridan; Gilles Dagenais; Rafael Diaz; Alvaro Avezum; Fernando Lanas; Jeffrey Probstfield; George Fodor; Rury R Holman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: X R Pan; G W Li; Y H Hu; J X Wang; W Y Yang; Z X An; Z X Hu; J Lin; J Z Xiao; H B Cao; P A Liu; X G Jiang; Y Y Jiang; J P Wang; H Zheng; H Zhang; P H Bennett; B V Howard Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jaana Lindström; Pirjo Ilanne-Parikka; Markku Peltonen; Sirkka Aunola; Johan G Eriksson; Katri Hemiö; Helena Hämäläinen; Pirjo Härkönen; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; Mauri Laakso; Anne Louheranta; Marjo Mannelin; Merja Paturi; Jouko Sundvall; Timo T Valle; Matti Uusitupa; Jaakko Tuomilehto Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-11-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Thomas A Buchanan; Anny H Xiang; Ruth K Peters; Siri L Kjos; Aura Marroquin; Jose Goico; Cesar Ochoa; Sylvia Tan; Kathleen Berkowitz; Howard N Hodis; Stanley P Azen Journal: Diabetes Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Devjit Tripathy; Dawn C Schwenke; MaryAnn Banerji; George A Bray; Thomas A Buchanan; Stephen C Clement; Robert R Henry; Abbas E Kitabchi; Sunder Mudaliar; Robert E Ratner; Frankie B Stentz; Nicolas Musi; Peter D Reaven; Ralph A DeFronzo Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Richard F Hamman; Edward Horton; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; George A Bray; Costas A Christophi; Jill Crandall; Jose C Florez; Sarah Fowler; Ronald Goldberg; Steven E Kahn; William C Knowler; John M Lachin; Mary Beth Murphy; Elizabeth Venditti Journal: Diabetes Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 9.461