Literature DB >> 21114848

GCKR gene functional variants in type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome: do the rare variants associate with increased carotid intima-media thickness?

Márton Mohás1, Péter Kisfali, Luca Járomi, Anita Maász, Eszter Fehér, Veronika Csöngei, Noémi Polgár, Eniko Sáfrány, Judit Cseh, Katalin Sümegi, Katalin Hetyésy, István Wittmann, Béla Melegh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies revealed that glucokinase regulatory protein (GCKR) variants (rs780094 and rs1260326) are associated with serum triglycerides and plasma glucose levels. Here we analyzed primarily the association of these two variants with the lipid profile and plasma glucose levels in Hungarian subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome; and also correlated the genotypes with the carotid intima-media thickness records.
METHODS: A total of 321 type 2 diabetic patients, 455 metabolic syndrome patients, and 172 healthy controls were genotyped by PCR-RFLP.
RESULTS: Both GCKR variants were found to associate with serum triglycerides and with fasting plasma glucose. However, significant association with the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome could not be observed. Analyzing the records of the patients, a positive association of prevalence the GCKR homozygous functional variants and carotid intima-media thickness was found in the metabolic syndrome patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results support that rs780094 and rs1260326 functional variants of the GCKR gene are inversely associated with serum triglycerides and fasting plasma glucose levels, as it was already reported for diabetic and metabolic syndrome patients in some other populations. Besides this positive replication, as a novel feature, our preliminary findings also suggest a cardiovascular risk role of the GCKR minor allele carriage based on the carotid intima-media thickness association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21114848      PMCID: PMC3009616          DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-9-79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol        ISSN: 1475-2840            Impact factor:   9.951


1. Background

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is characterized by elevated plasma glucose level as a result of impaired beta-cell function and/or peripheral insulin resistance [1]. Impaired glucose regulation is a major hallmark of metabolic syndrome (MS), however it is a more complex disorder featured by visceral obesity, elevated serum triglycerides, low level of HDL-cholesterol and raised blood pressure [2]. The prevalence of T2DM and MS is very high in the industrialized countries contributing to a considerably increased atherosclerotic burden and cardiovascular risk. Both of them are multifactorial diseases, besides several environmental factors, such as cigarette smoking, obesity, lack of exercise, bad nutrition habits and genetic factors are also contributed to the pathogenesis. Glucokinase (GCK) is a predominant glucose phosphorylating enzyme expressed in the liver and in the beta-cells of the Langerhans islets, playing a pivotal role in the glucose-stimulated insulin release as a physiological glucose-sensor [3]. Pancreatic islets and the liver contain a regulatory protein (glucokinase regulatory protein, GCKR), which inhibits GCK in an allosteric manner with respect to glucose concentration by forming an inactive heterodimer. The inhibitory effect of GCKR is enhanced by fructose-6-phosphate and antagonized by fructose-1-phosphate [4]. The 27 kb GCKR gene is located on chromosome 2p23 containing 19 exons and encodes a 68 kDa protein [5,6]. Genome-wide association studies showed, that common functional variants of the GCKR gene are associated with fasting plasma glucose, insulin levels, and both serum triglycerides and low/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, thus, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs780094 and rs1260326 reduce fasting plasma glucose concentration and insulin levels and improve insulin resistance, while inversely increase fasting and postprandial serum triglycerides [7-16]. More recently, both functional variants of the GCKR gene were widely investigated as candidate T2DM susceptibility variants, and a protective nature against T2DM [8,10,17,18]. The primary goal of the current work was to study the possible association of rs780094 and rs1260326 of the GCKR gene on metabolic and cardiovascular risk traits in Hungarian patients, which nation differs from the surrounding European populations in its origin [19]. The pooled ultrasonography records of the patients enabled us to study also the carotid intima-media thickness association.

2. Methods

2.1. Study population

In a genetic association study we examined two common variants (rs780094 and rs1260326) of the GCKR gene. The study population comprised 321 subjects with T2DM (172 males, 149 females, mean age: 61.3 ± 12.2 years, range: 27-89 years), 455 subjects with MS (200 males, 255 females, mean age: 61.7 ± 10.7, range: 26-85 years) and 172 healthy control subjects (49 males, 123 females, mean age: 56.5 ± 15.2, range: 19-92 years). All 948 study participants were selected from the Caucasian Hungarian population. All patients were enrolled from the 2nd Department of Medicine and Nephrological Center, University of Pécs, Hungary and from the Aladár Petz Hospital, Győr, Hungary. T2DM was diagnosed according to the criteria of the World Health Organization [1]. Waist circumference data were not available, therefore MS was diagnosed according to modified criteria of the Adult Treatment Panel III of National Cholesterol Education Program [20], defined as presence of at least 3 of the following factors at the time of diagnosis: body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2, serum triglycerides≥1.70 mmol/l and/or lipid lowering treatment; serum HDL-cholesterol < 0.9/1.1 mmol/l (male/female); systolic blood pressure≥130 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure≥85 mmHg and/or antihypertensive treatment; fasting plasma glucose≥5.60 mmol/l and/or antiglycemic treatment. Hypertriglyceridemia was defined as fasting serum triglycerides≥1.7 mmol/l. Controls were gathered from trauma units, blood donors, medical staff and university students, they were free from any single clinical or laboratory sign of T2DM or MS; their medical history were also free from any systemic or organ-specific disease. Exclusion criteria were as follows: pregnancy, fever, sepsis, malignancies, autoimmune systemic diseases, alcohol or drog abuse, severe heart failure, hepatic failure. DNA samples and the clinical data were deposited into the Central Biobank governed by the University of Pécs, as part of the National Biobank Network of Hungary http://www.biobank.hu, approved by the national Scientific Research Ethics Committee (ETT TUKEB). The Biobank belongs to the pan-European Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure (BBMRI) preparatory phase project http://bbmri.eu/bbmri/. All participants gave their informed consent and the study followed the principles of the Helsinki Declaration.

2.2. Biochemical and clinical data

All participants underwent a detailed medical examination, including anamnestic history, physical examination, and estimation of cardiovascular risk factors, laboratory and urine analysis, electrocardiography. Laboratory parameters were assessed using routine methods from fasting blood samples. BMI was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m2). Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) was measured by B-mode ultrasound device with a high resolution 10 MHz linear transducer (ALOKA 4000, Tokyo, Japan) in a plaque free region of both carotid arteries at 2 cm proximal to the carotid bulb on the common carotid artery and at the origin of the internal carotid artery. The ultrasound transducer was placed in an angle of 90° of the vessel wall. CIMT values were obtained from the above mentioned sites and were defined as means of the maximal CIMT measurements for the right and left sides. Each participants were scanned in a standardized environment, in the same room, by the same examiner, using the same instrument.

2.3. Genotyping

DNA was isolated from peripheral blood leukocytes by standard salting out method. For polymerase chain reaction amplification, the following primers (MWG-Biotech AG, Ebersberg, Germany) were used: GCKR rs1260326: forward 5'-TGC AGA CTA TAG TGG AGC CG-3' and reverse 5'-CAT CAC ATG GCC ACT GCT TT-3'; GCKR rs780094: forward 5'-GAT TGT CTC AGG CAA ACC TGG TAG-3' and reverse 5'-CTA GGA GTG GTG GCA TAC ACC TG-3'. An MJ Research PTC-200 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used for the amplification. PCR conditions were the following: predenaturation at 96°C for 2 min; followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 96°C for 20 sec (rs1260326), 30 cycles of denaturation at 96°C for 20 sec (rs780094); annealing at 60°C for 20 sec (rs1260326), and at 62°C for 30 sec (rs780094); primer extension for 30 sec at 72°C; and final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The amplicons were digested by HpaII restriction endonuclease (rs1260326) and PscI (rs780094) (Fermentas, Burlington, ON, Canada). The digestion of 231 bp amplicon of rs1260326 CC genotype resulted in 18, 63, 150 bp fragments; the TT genotype 18 and 213 bp; while the heterozygous genotype 18, 63, 150, 213 bp fragments. For the rs780094 427 bp amplicon the following fragments were detected: GG genotype 62, 177, 188 bp; AA genotype 62, 365 bp; heterozygous genotype 62, 177, 188, 365 bp fragments. All methods were designed to include an obligate cleavage site on the amplicon to enable us to control the efficacy of the digestion.

2.4. Statistical analysis

BMI, fasting plasma glucose concentrations, serum triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol levels were log-transformed because of non-normal distribution. Results were expressed as mean ± SD and median (minimum-maximum) as appropriate according to distribution. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess sample distribution. Chi-square test was carried out to determine whether genotype distributions followed the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and to compare other qualitative data. Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the study participants at baseline were compared with one-way ANOVA. Statistical differences between the individual GCKR genotypes were assessed by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for gender, age, BMI. Trend was examined with Jonckheere-Terpstra test. Logistic regression analysis models were used to evaluate individual effects of genotypes as possible risk factors; multivariate regression analysis models were adjusted for age, gender, total serum cholesterol, coronary artery diseases (CAD) and statin therapy. All statistical procedures were performed using the SPSS 15.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Major clinical and biochemical features of the patients and controls are summarized in Table 1; the genotype profiles including the minor allele frequencies are shown in Table 2. All genotypes were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Allele frequencies were similar in the study groups.
Table 1

Clinical and biochemical features of the patients with T2DM, MS and control subjects.

Controlsn = 172T2DMn = 321MSn = 455p-value
Gender (male/female)49/123172/149200/255< 0.001
Age (years)56.5 ± 15.261.3 ± 12.261.7 ± 10.7< 0.001*
Body mass index (kg/m2)23.9 ± 2.1529.5 ± 5.8733.3 ± 5.48< 0.001*#
Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l)N/A8.70 (2.30-22.8)9.00 (3.00-30.8)0.249
Serum total cholesterol (mmol/l)4.78 ± 1.105.16 ± 1.255.37 ± 0.94< 0.001
Serum LDL-cholesterol (mmol/l)N/A2.74 ± 0.862.83 ± 0.840.256
Serum HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l)N/A1.19 (0.55-2.12)1.23 (0.55-2.49)< 0.001
Serum triglycerides (mmol/l)1.50 (0.50-3.60)1.62 (0.35-14.8)1.98 (0.35-14.48)< 0.001#†
CIMT (mm)N/A0.88 ± 0.441.22 ± 0.740.265
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)N/A130 (87.0-210)140 (70.0-200)< 0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)N/A80.0 (50.0-130)80.0 (60.0-137)< 0.001
Hypertension (%)22.777.590.4< 0.001*
Coronary heart disease (%)4.125.325.4< 0.001*

CIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; N/A: data not available; MS: metabolic syndrome, T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus; * Controls vs. T2DM and MS; # T2DM vs. MS; † Controls vs. MS; Data are means ± SD or median (minimum-maximum) as appropriate.

Table 2

Genotype distribution (case number) and allele frequencies (%) in control subjects and in patients with T2DM and MS.

ControlsT2DMMS
GCKR(rs780094)GG4477121
GA93151217
AA3578100
A allele (%)47.446.947.6

GCKR(rs1260326)CC4880118
CT80155219
TT446391
T allele (%)48.847.146.8

T2DM: subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus; MS: subjects with metabolic syndrome

Clinical and biochemical features of the patients with T2DM, MS and control subjects. CIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; N/A: data not available; MS: metabolic syndrome, T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus; * Controls vs. T2DM and MS; # T2DM vs. MS; † Controls vs. MS; Data are means ± SD or median (minimum-maximum) as appropriate. Genotype distribution (case number) and allele frequencies (%) in control subjects and in patients with T2DM and MS. T2DM: subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus; MS: subjects with metabolic syndrome Table 3 shows the lipid parameters examined, the plasma glucose concentrations, BMI, and CIMT data for each analyzed SNP of the GCKR gene. BMI is not associated either with rs780094 or with rs1260326, however plasma glucose levels were associated with both variants significantly (p < 0.05). We observed association of the minor allele of rs780094 and rs1260326 with elevated serum triglycerides in all groups. We found no relationship between variants of GCKR gene and total serum cholesterol levels, however HDL-cholesterol level was significantly lower in subjects homozygous for the minor allele for both rs780094 and rs1260326, but only in T2DM patients, moreover LDL-cholesterol was significantly elevated in homozygous patients, but only in the MS group. We also correlated the CIMT of the patients with T2DM and MS. The homozygous minor alleles were associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness in metabolic syndrome patients.
Table 3

Body mass index, fasting plasma glucose, lipid profile and carotid intima-media thickness in subjects with metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus and controls by individual genotypes (A: GCKR rs780094; B: GCKR rs1260326)

ControlsT2DMMS

GGn = 44GAn = 93AAn = 35GGn = 77GAn = 151AAn = 78GGn = 121GAn = 217AAn = 100

ABMI (kg/m2)23.6(21.2-28.6)23.9(15.8-32.8)23.8(13.7-26.8)29.2(17.0-48.6)29.0(18.3-45.9)27.3(18.3-43.4)32.5(22.5-52.5)32.7(20.4-48.1)32.9(19.4-60.5)
FPG (mmol/l)N/AN/AN/A9.50(3.00-17.0)9.20(3.80-22.8)8.90(2.30-17.1)*9.60(3.80-19.1)8.80(3.00-30.8)8.50(4.51-16.6)*
Serum triglycerides (mmol/l)1.35(0.50-2.90)1.50(0.80-3.60)1.70(0.70-3.20)*1.77(0.38-8.23)1.81(0.35-6.22)2.24(0.66-14.8)*2.07(0.49-7.76)2.68(0.35-14.2)*3.07(0.78-12.3)#
Serum total-cholesterol (mmol/l)5.48 ± 0.805.44 ± 0.945.04 ± 1.045.01 ± 1.024.60 ± 1.124.75 ± 1.105.03 ± 1.055.15 ± 1.365.35 ± 1.26
Serum HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l)N/AN/AN/A1.39(0.76-2.48)1.25(0.68-2.37)1.19(0.62-2.49)*1.21(0.77-1.99)1.22(0.55-2.12)1.17(0.79-1.88)
Serum LDL-cholesterol (mmol/l)N/AN/AN/A2.84 ± 0.902.64 ± 0.832.75 ± 0.892.08 ± 0.812.70 ± 0.833.06 ± 0.92*
CIMT (mm)N/AN/AN/A0.81 ± 0.420.86 ± 0.380.95 ± 0.440.79 ± 0.280.87 ± 0.321.06 ± 0.26*
ControlsT2DMMS

CCn = 48TCn = 80TTn = 44CCn = 80TCn = 155TTn = 63CCn = 118TCn = 219TTn = 91

BBMI (kg/m2)23.7(20.8-28-6)23.8(15.8-32.8)23.8(13.7-26.8)29.2(17.0-37.6)29.3(18.3-45.9)28.9(18.3-38.6)31.8(20.4-49.57)32.8(19.4-52.5)33.4(25.0-60.5)
FPG (mmol/l)N/AN/AN/A9.05(3.00-16.9)8.90(2.30-17.1)8.70(2.30-22.8)*9.80(3.20-20.0)8.60(3.90-30.8)8.40(3.00-16.6)*
Serum triglycerides (mmol/l)1.51(0.50-2.90)1.55(0.70-2.90)1.68(0.80-3.60)*1.45(0.35-4.28)1.87(0.39-8.23)*2.32(0.59-14.9)*2.19(0.70-7.86)2.72(0.35-14.4)*2.91(0.78-11.5)*
Serum total-cholesterol (mmol/l)5.44 ± 0.875.41 ± 0.965.20 ± 0.995.03 ± 1.114.64 ± 0.974.72 ± 1.325.10 ± 1.025.21 ± 1.385.20 ± 1.27
Serum HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l)N/AN/AN/A1.39(0.76-2.48)1.27(0.68-2.47)1.17(0.62-2.49)*1.23(0.70-1.96)1.16(0.55-2.12)1.23(0.79-1.88)
Serum LDL-cholesterol (mmol/l)N/AN/AN/A2.85 ± 0.882.63 ± 0.782.78 ± 1.052.71 ± 0.812.85 ± 0.823.00 ± 0.93*
CIMT (mm)N/AN/AN/A0.81 ± 0.390.88 ± 0.370.95 ± 0.420.83 ± 0.320.87 ± 0.351.05 ± 0.36*

* p < 0.05 vs. GG; # p < 0.001 vs. GG; BMI, body mass index; CIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MS, metabolic syndrome; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; Data are mean ± SD or median (minimum-maximum) as appropriate.

Body mass index, fasting plasma glucose, lipid profile and carotid intima-media thickness in subjects with metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus and controls by individual genotypes (A: GCKR rs780094; B: GCKR rs1260326) * p < 0.05 vs. GG; # p < 0.001 vs. GG; BMI, body mass index; CIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MS, metabolic syndrome; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; Data are mean ± SD or median (minimum-maximum) as appropriate. Table 4. shows the relative risk of hypertriglyceridemia for variants rs780094 and rs1260326 at GCKR gene calculated by the multiple logistic regression analysis models. Regression analysis revealed that both rs780094 and rs1260326 confer a significant susceptibility for the development of hypertriglyceridemia; after adjusting the results for age, gender, total serum cholesterol, CAD and statin therapy.
Table 4

Odds ratios at 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated by the multiple logistic regression analysis models.

Hypertriglyceridemia
Unadjusted modelOdds ratio(95% CI)Adjusted modelOdds ratio*(95% CI)

GCKR (rs780094)AA genotype1.748(1.256-2.435)p = 0.0015.335(1.779-15.99)p = 0.003
GCKR (rs1260326)TT genotype1.311(1.078-1.596)p = 0.0074.523(1.458-14.03)p = 0.009

*Adjusted for: age, gender, BMI, serum total cholesterol, CAD, statins

Odds ratios at 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated by the multiple logistic regression analysis models. *Adjusted for: age, gender, BMI, serum total cholesterol, CAD, statins

4. Discussion

Genome wide association studies revealed an association between SNP rs780094 of GCKR gene and hypertriglyceridemia in subjects with T2DM [12]. This association was replicated in other large diabetic and non-diabetic population samples [10,13]. Besides the triglyceride levels, the SNP was also associated with lower plasma glucose levels, and with lower risk for the development of T2DM [12,17]. Another SNP of GCKR (rs1260326, P446L) is in strong linkage disequilibrium (r2 = 0.96) with rs780094 according the HapMap II data http://www.hapmap.org. In Danish diabetic twins and in the Dutch population rs1260326 was found to be associated with increased insulin secretion and lower plasma glucose [7,21], and association with elevated triglycerides was also confirmed in different populations [8,9]. By contrast, the rs1260326 allele was found to correlate with metabolic traits, but not with susceptibility for the development of metabolic syndrome in the Scandinavian population [22]. In the current study, we could replicate the previously reported positive associations of the two functional variants of GCKR gene (rs780094 and rs1260326) and triglyceride/glucose metabolism in the Hungarian population; our results confirmed the inverse association with serum triglycerides and plasma glucose levels in T2DM, MS and healthy control subjects. GCKR competitively inhibits GCK, playing a major role in the regulation of insulin secretion and glycogen metabolism and considered as a potential susceptibility gene for T2DM. In the presence of low glucose concentrations both GCK and GCKR are localized in the nucleus of hepatocytes due to metabolic alterations (higher glucose or fructose concentrations) GCK, but not GCKR, translocates into the cytoplasm [23,24]. Furthermore, GCKR is also play a role in the nuclear-cytoplasmic transport and in the protection against degradation of GCK [25-27]. Animal models have also shown that GCKR also regulates the posttranscriptional expression of GCK. Taken all these data together, it is obvious that functional change in this regulatory protein may considerably influence the glucose metabolism. In SNP rs1260326 of the GCKR a C/T change results in a proline to leucine substitution in the amino sequence of the encoded protein. This change is very likely to modify the structure of the protein and if this structural alteration is in the binding site of fructose-6-phosphate or fructose-1-phosphate it can influence the function of the protein. Increased glycolitic flux, downregulated glucose-6-phosphatase and upregulated GCK, phosphofructokinase and fatty acid synthase result in an increased glycogen synthesis and malonil-CoA concentration and an increased VLDL triglyceride production. These metabolic changes might potentially explain the lower plasma glucose and higher triglyceride levels, however the exact mechanism remains to be elucidated [8,28]. Measuring CIMT, as a surrogate marker of cardiovascular disease, is widely used and validated method in both patients with or without T2DM to detect subclinical atherosclerosis, however to predict the relative risk for the development of future cardiovascular diseases is much more difficult and presumes holistic interpretation of the complex interactions between both genetic and clinical factors. Besides the conventional cardiovascular risk factors as hypertension, high LDL-cholesterol level, low HDL-cholesterol level, hypertriglyceridemia, also the level of advanced glycation endproducts (e.g. N-epsilon-carboxymethyllysine) confer an independent significant risk for cardiovascular diseases and associated with atherosclerotic lesions not only in diabetic but in normoglycemic subjects [29-34]. Common variants in the GCKR gene were referred to be associated also with higher C-reactive protein levels, which is a favorable atherosclerotic marker. Here we also investigated the lipid traits and the CIMT, which was proved an independent preclinical marker of atherosclerosis and CAD.

5. Conclusions

Our results support that rs780094 and rs1260326 functional variants of the GCKR gene are inversely associated with serum triglycerides and fasting plasma glucose levels. As a novel feature, in this report we found, that homozygous rs780094 and rs1260326 GCKR gene variants are associated with CIMT.

6. List of abbreviations

BMI: Body mass index; CIMT: Carotid intima-media thickness; CAD; Coronary artery diseases; GCK: Glucokinase; GCKR: Glucokinase regulatory protein; MS: Metabolic syndrome; SNPS: Single nucleotide polymorphisms, T2DM: Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

7. Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

8. Authors' contributions

MM participated in the design of the study, participated in acquisition of data, prepared and wrote the manuscript, performed the statistical analysis. PK, LJ, AM, VCs, NP, ES and KS carried out the molecular genetic studies. EF carried out the ultrasonography examinations. JCs and KH helped in acquisition of data, IW and BM conceived and coordinated the study. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
  34 in total

1.  Comparison of mtDNA haplogroups in Hungarians with four other European populations: a small incidence of descents with Asian origin.

Authors:  Edit Nadasi; P Gyurus; Márta Czakó; Judit Bene; Sz Kosztolányi; Sz Fazekas; P Dömösi; B Melegh
Journal:  Acta Biol Hung       Date:  2007-06

2.  Glucokinase regulatory protein is essential for the proper subcellular localisation of liver glucokinase.

Authors:  N de la Iglesia; M Veiga-da-Cunha; E Van Schaftingen; J J Guinovart; J C Ferrer
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1999-08-06       Impact factor: 4.124

3.  Effect of mutations on the sensitivity of human beta-cell glucokinase to liver regulatory protein.

Authors:  M Veiga-da-Cunha; L Z Xu; Y H Lee; D Marotta; S J Pilkis; E Van Schaftingen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 4.  Pancreatic beta-cell glucokinase: closing the gap between theoretical concepts and experimental realities.

Authors:  F M Matschinsky; B Glaser; M A Magnuson
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.461

5.  Glucokinase regulatory protein may interact with glucokinase in the hepatocyte nucleus.

Authors:  K S Brown; S S Kalinowski; J R Megill; S K Durham; K A Mookhtiar
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.461

6.  Novel polymorphisms in the GCKR gene and their influence on glucose and insulin levels in a Danish twin population.

Authors:  B Køster; M Fenger; P Poulsen; A Vaag; J Bentzen
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.359

7.  Intracellular distribution of hepatic glucokinase and glucokinase regulatory protein during the fasted to refed transition in rats.

Authors:  J M Fernández-Novell; S Castel; D Bellido; J C Ferrer; S Vilaró; J J Guinovart
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1999-10-08       Impact factor: 4.124

8.  Genetic variants and their interactions in the prediction of increased pre-clinical carotid atherosclerosis: the cardiovascular risk in young Finns study.

Authors:  Sebastian Okser; Terho Lehtimäki; Laura L Elo; Nina Mononen; Nina Peltonen; Mika Kähönen; Markus Juonala; Yue-Mei Fan; Jussi A Hernesniemi; Tomi Laitinen; Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen; Riikka Rontu; Carita Eklund; Nina Hutri-Kähönen; Leena Taittonen; Mikko Hurme; Jorma S A Viikari; Olli T Raitakari; Tero Aittokallio
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Human glucokinase regulatory protein (GCKR): cDNA and genomic cloning, complete primary structure, and chromosomal localization.

Authors:  J P Warner; J P Leek; S Intody; A F Markham; D T Bonthron
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.957

10.  Genome-wide association analysis identifies loci for type 2 diabetes and triglyceride levels.

Authors:  Richa Saxena; Benjamin F Voight; Valeriya Lyssenko; Noël P Burtt; Paul I W de Bakker; Hong Chen; Jeffrey J Roix; Sekar Kathiresan; Joel N Hirschhorn; Mark J Daly; Thomas E Hughes; Leif Groop; David Altshuler; Peter Almgren; Jose C Florez; Joanne Meyer; Kristin Ardlie; Kristina Bengtsson Boström; Bo Isomaa; Guillaume Lettre; Ulf Lindblad; Helen N Lyon; Olle Melander; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Peter Nilsson; Marju Orho-Melander; Lennart Råstam; Elizabeth K Speliotes; Marja-Riitta Taskinen; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Candace Guiducci; Anna Berglund; Joyce Carlson; Lauren Gianniny; Rachel Hackett; Liselotte Hall; Johan Holmkvist; Esa Laurila; Marketa Sjögren; Maria Sterner; Aarti Surti; Margareta Svensson; Malin Svensson; Ryan Tewhey; Brendan Blumenstiel; Melissa Parkin; Matthew Defelice; Rachel Barry; Wendy Brodeur; Jody Camarata; Nancy Chia; Mary Fava; John Gibbons; Bob Handsaker; Claire Healy; Kieu Nguyen; Casey Gates; Carrie Sougnez; Diane Gage; Marcia Nizzari; Stacey B Gabriel; Gung-Wei Chirn; Qicheng Ma; Hemang Parikh; Delwood Richardson; Darrell Ricke; Shaun Purcell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  17 in total

1.  Functional variants of lipid level modifier MLXIPL, GCKR, GALNT2, CILP2, ANGPTL3 and TRIB1 genes in healthy Roma and Hungarian populations.

Authors:  Katalin Sumegi; Luca Jaromi; Lili Magyari; Erzsebet Kovesdi; Balazs Duga; Renata Szalai; Anita Maasz; Petra Matyas; Ingrid Janicsek; Bela Melegh
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Variant in the glucokinase regulatory protein (GCKR) gene is associated with fatty liver in obese children and adolescents.

Authors:  Nicola Santoro; Clarence K Zhang; Hongyu Zhao; Andrew J Pakstis; Grace Kim; Romy Kursawe; Daniel J Dykas; Allen E Bale; Cosimo Giannini; Bridget Pierpont; Melissa M Shaw; Leif Groop; Sonia Caprio
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Lack of associations of ten candidate coronary heart disease risk genetic variants and subclinical atherosclerosis in four US populations: the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) study.

Authors:  Lili Zhang; Petra Buzkova; Christina L Wassel; Mary J Roman; Kari E North; Dana C Crawford; Jonathan Boston; Kristin D Brown-Gentry; Shelley A Cole; Ewa Deelman; Robert Goodloe; Sarah Wilson; Gerardo Heiss; Nancy S Jenny; Neal W Jorgensen; Tara C Matise; Bob E McClellan; Alejandro Q Nato; Marylyn D Ritchie; Nora Franceschini; W H Linda Kao
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.162

4.  Association of glucokinase regulatory protein polymorphism with type 2 diabetes and fasting plasma glucose: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hong Li; Rongjuan Xu; Xin Peng; Yaqiong Wang; Tao Wang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Association of GCKR rs780094 polymorphism with circulating lipid levels in type 2 diabetes and hyperuricemia in Uygur Chinese.

Authors:  Li Wang; Qi Ma; Hua Yao; Li-Juan He; Bin-Bin Fang; Wen Cai; Bei Zhang; Zhi-Qiang Wang; Yin-Xia Su; Guo-Li Du; Shu-Xia Wang; Zhao-Xia Zhang; Qin-Qin Hou; Ren Cai; Fang-Ping He
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2018-09-01

6.  A genome-wide association meta-analysis of circulating sex hormone-binding globulin reveals multiple Loci implicated in sex steroid hormone regulation.

Authors:  Andrea D Coviello; Robin Haring; Melissa Wellons; Dhananjay Vaidya; Terho Lehtimäki; Sarah Keildson; Kathryn L Lunetta; Chunyan He; Myriam Fornage; Vasiliki Lagou; Massimo Mangino; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Brian Chen; Joel Eriksson; Melissa Garcia; Yong Mei Liu; Annemarie Koster; Kurt Lohman; Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen; Ann-Kristin Petersen; Jennifer Prescott; Lisette Stolk; Liesbeth Vandenput; Andrew R Wood; Wei Vivian Zhuang; Aimo Ruokonen; Anna-Liisa Hartikainen; Anneli Pouta; Stefania Bandinelli; Reiner Biffar; Georg Brabant; David G Cox; Yuhui Chen; Steven Cummings; Luigi Ferrucci; Marc J Gunter; Susan E Hankinson; Hannu Martikainen; Albert Hofman; Georg Homuth; Thomas Illig; John-Olov Jansson; Andrew D Johnson; David Karasik; Magnus Karlsson; Johannes Kettunen; Douglas P Kiel; Peter Kraft; Jingmin Liu; Östen Ljunggren; Mattias Lorentzon; Marcello Maggio; Marcello R P Markus; Dan Mellström; Iva Miljkovic; Daniel Mirel; Sarah Nelson; Laure Morin Papunen; Petra H M Peeters; Inga Prokopenko; Leslie Raffel; Martin Reincke; Alex P Reiner; Kathryn Rexrode; Fernando Rivadeneira; Stephen M Schwartz; David Siscovick; Nicole Soranzo; Doris Stöckl; Shelley Tworoger; André G Uitterlinden; Carla H van Gils; Ramachandran S Vasan; H-Erich Wichmann; Guangju Zhai; Shalender Bhasin; Martin Bidlingmaier; Stephen J Chanock; Immaculata De Vivo; Tamara B Harris; David J Hunter; Mika Kähönen; Simin Liu; Pamela Ouyang; Tim D Spector; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Jorma Viikari; Henri Wallaschofski; Mark I McCarthy; Timothy M Frayling; Anna Murray; Steve Franks; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; Frank H de Jong; Olli Raitakari; Alexander Teumer; Claes Ohlsson; Joanne M Murabito; John R B Perry
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Effect of genetic and environmental influences on cardiometabolic risk factors: a twin study.

Authors:  György Jermendy; Tamás Horváth; Levente Littvay; Rita Steinbach; Adám L Jermendy; Adám D Tárnoki; Dávid L Tárnoki; Júlia Métneki; János Osztovits
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 9.951

8.  Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Common Hypertriglyceridemia Genetic Variants in Patients with Systemic Erythematosus Lupus.

Authors:  Marta Fanlo-Maresma; Beatriz Candás-Estébanez; Virginia Esteve-Luque; Ariadna Padró-Miquel; Francesc Escrihuela-Vidal; Monica Carratini-Moraes; Emili Corbella; Xavier Corbella; Xavier Pintó
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Genome-wide association analysis of metabolic syndrome quantitative traits in the GENNID multiethnic family study.

Authors:  Jia Y Wan; Deborah L Goodman; Emileigh L Willems; Alexis R Freedland; Trina M Norden-Krichmar; Stephanie A Santorico; Karen L Edwards
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.320

10.  Large scale meta-analyses of fasting plasma glucose raising variants in GCK, GCKR, MTNR1B and G6PC2 and their impacts on type 2 diabetes mellitus risk.

Authors:  Haoran Wang; Lei Liu; Jinzhao Zhao; Guanglin Cui; Chen Chen; Hu Ding; Dao Wen Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.