Literature DB >> 21114378

LAPPRO: a prospective multicentre comparative study of robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Thordis Thorsteinsdottir1, Johan Stranne, Stefan Carlsson, Bo Anderberg, Ingela Björholt, Jan-Erik Damber, Jonas Hugosson, Ulrica Wilderäng, Peter Wiklund, Gunnar Steineck, Eva Haglind.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study describes the study design and procedures for a prospective, non-randomized trial comparing open retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy regarding functional and oncological outcomes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The aim was to achieve a detailed prospective registration of symptoms experienced by patients using validated questionnaires in addition to documentation of surgical details, clinical examinations, medical facts and resource use. Four patient questionnaires and six case-report forms were especially designed to collect data before, during and after surgery with a follow-up time of 2 years. The primary endpoint is urinary leakage 1 year after surgery. Secondary endpoints include erectile dysfunction, oncological outcome, quality of life and cost-effectiveness at 3, 12 and 24 months after surgery.
RESULTS: The study started in September 2008 with accrual continuing to October 2011. Twelve urological departments in Sweden well established in performing radical prostatectomy are participating. Personal contact with the participating departments and patients was established to ascertain a high response rate. To reach 80% statistical power to detect a difference of 5 absolute per cent in incidence of urinary leakage, 700 men in the retropubic group and 1400 in the robotic group are needed.
CONCLUSIONS: The Swedish healthcare context is well suited to performing multicentre long-term prospective clinical trials. The similar care protocols and congruent specialist training are particularly favourable. The LAPPRO trial aims to compare the two surgical techniques in aspects of short- and long-term functional and oncological outcome, cost effectiveness and quality of life, supplying new knowledge to support future decisions in treatment strategies for prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21114378     DOI: 10.3109/00365599.2010.532506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0036-5599


  22 in total

1.  Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Between Open and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy at 24-month Follow-up in the Swedish LAPPRO Trial.

Authors:  Martin Nyberg; Jonas Hugosson; Peter Wiklund; Daniel Sjoberg; Ulrica Wilderäng; Sigrid V Carlsson; Stefan Carlsson; Johan Stranne; Gunnar Steineck; Eva Haglind; Anders Bjartell
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-06-11

2.  Development of urologic laparoscopy in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland: a survey among urologists.

Authors:  Florian Imkamp; Thomas R W Herrmann; Jens U Stolzenburg; Jens Rassweiler; Tullio Sulser; Uwe Zimmermann; Sebastian Dziuba; Markus A Kuczyk; Martin Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Thinking about one's own death after prostate-cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Thordis K Thorsteinsdottir; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Johan Stranne; Ulrica Wilderäng; Eva Haglind; Gunnar Steineck
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Sexual function in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors-a population-based study.

Authors:  Maria Olsson; Gunnar Steineck; Karin Enskär; Ulrica Wilderäng; Marianne Jarfelt
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 4.442

5.  Oncological and functional outcomes 1 year after radical prostatectomy for very-low-risk prostate cancer: results from the prospective LAPPRO trial.

Authors:  Stefan Carlsson; Fredrik Jäderling; Anna Wallerstedt; Tommy Nyberg; Johan Stranne; Thordis Thorsteinsdottir; Sigrid V Carlsson; Anders Bjartell; Jonas Hugosson; Eva Haglind; Gunnar Steineck
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a large prospective multicentre study.

Authors:  David Bock; Martin Nyberg; Anna Lantz; Sigrid V Carlsson; Daniel D Sjoberg; Stefan Carlsson; Johan Stranne; Gunnar Steineck; Peter Wiklund; Eva Haglind; Anders Bjartell
Journal:  Scand J Urol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 1.899

7.  Comparison of continence recovery between robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and open radical retropubic prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Seung Jun Son; Sang Chul Lee; Chang Wook Jeong; Seong Jin Jeong; Seok Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-09-10

8.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy: comparison of the open and robotic approaches for treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2012

9.  Effects of surgeon variability on oncologic and functional outcomes in a population-based setting.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Anders Berglund; Daniel Sjoberg; Ali Khatami; Johan Stranne; Svante Bergdahl; Pär Lodding; Gunnar Aus; Andrew Vickers; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Intrusive thoughts and quality of life among men with prostate cancer before and three months after surgery.

Authors:  Thordis Thorsteinsdottir; Maria Hedelin; Johan Stranne; Heiddis Valdimarsdóttir; Ulrica Wilderäng; Eva Haglind; Gunnar Steineck
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.