Literature DB >> 26867018

Oncological and functional outcomes 1 year after radical prostatectomy for very-low-risk prostate cancer: results from the prospective LAPPRO trial.

Stefan Carlsson1, Fredrik Jäderling2, Anna Wallerstedt1, Tommy Nyberg3, Johan Stranne4, Thordis Thorsteinsdottir5, Sigrid V Carlsson6, Anders Bjartell7, Jonas Hugosson4, Eva Haglind8, Gunnar Steineck3,9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyse oncological and functional outcomes 12 months after treatment of very-low-risk prostate cancer with radical prostatectomy in men who could have been candidates for active surveillance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of all men with very-low-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy at one of 14 participating centres. Validated patient questionnaires were collected at baseline and after 12 months by independent healthcare researchers. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥0.25 ng/mL or treatment with salvage radiotherapy or with hormones. Urinary continence was defined as <1 pad changed per 24 h. Erectile function was defined as ability to achieve erection hard enough for penetration more than half of the time after sexual stimulation. Changes in tumour grade and stage were obtained from pathology reports. We report descriptive frequencies and proportions of men who had each outcome in various subgroups. Fisher's exact test was used to assess differences between the age groups.
RESULTS: Of the 4003 men in the LAPPRO cohort, 338 men fulfilled the preoperative national criteria for very-low-risk prostate cancer. Adverse pathology outcomes included upgrading, defined as pT3 or postoperative Gleason sum ≥7, which was present in 35% of the men (115/333) and positive surgical margins, which were present in 16% of the men (54/329). Only 2.1% of the men (7/329) had a PSA concentration >0.1 ng/mL 6-12 weeks postoperatively. Erectile function and urinary continence were observed in 44% (98/222) and 84% of the men (264/315), respectively, 12 months postoperatively. The proportion of men achieving the trifecta, defined as preoperative potent and continent men who remained potent and continent with no BCR, was 38% (84/221 men) at 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Our prospective study of men with very-low-risk prostate cancer undergoing open or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy showed that there were favourable oncological outcomes in approximately two-thirds. Approximately 40% did not have surgically induced urinary incontinence or erectile dysfunction 12 months postoperatively. These results provide additional support for the use of active surveillance in men with very-low-risk prostate cancer; however, the number of men with risk of upgrading and upstaging is not negligible. Improved stratification is still urgently needed.
© 2016 The Authors BJU International © 2016 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  erectile dysfunction; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; urinary incontinence; very-low-risk prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26867018      PMCID: PMC4947001          DOI: 10.1111/bju.13444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  33 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Thomas E Ahlering; Anthony Costello; James A Eastham; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni; Mani Menon; Alexandre Mottrie; Vipul R Patel; Henk Van der Poel; Raymond C Rosen; Ashutosh K Tewari; Timothy G Wilson; Filiberto Zattoni; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Analysis of outcomes after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (PRIAS).

Authors:  Albert El Hajj; Guillaume Ploussard; Alexandre de la Taille; Yves Allory; Dimitri Vordos; Andras Hoznek; Claude Clément Abbou; Laurent Salomon
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Quoc-Dien Trinh; Anders Bjartell; Stephen J Freedland; Brent K Hollenbeck; Jim C Hu; Shahrokh F Shariat; Maxine Sun; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Raymond C Rosen; Walter Artibani; Peter R Carroll; Anthony Costello; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Vipul R Patel; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Henk Van der Poel; Timothy G Wilson; Filiberto Zattoni; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Definitive pathology at radical prostatectomy is commonly favorable in men following initial active surveillance.

Authors:  Sung Kyu Hong; Itay A Sternberg; Gal E Keren Paz; Philip H Kim; Karim A Touijer; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-08-11       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomised trial.

Authors:  Eva Johansson; Gunnar Steineck; Lars Holmberg; Jan-Erik Johansson; Tommy Nyberg; Mirja Ruutu; Anna Bill-Axelson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Fecal incontinence affecting quality of life and social functioning among long-term gynecological cancer survivors.

Authors:  Gail Dunberger; Helena Lind; Gunnar Steineck; Ann-Charlotte Waldenström; Tommy Nyberg; Massoud al-Abany; Ullakarin Nyberg; Elisabeth Avall-Lundqvist
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.437

8.  Quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting.

Authors:  Gunnar Steineck; Fred Helgesen; Jan Adolfsson; Paul W Dickman; Jan-Erik Johansson; Bo Johan Norlén; Lars Holmberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Preoperative PSA velocity and the risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anthony V D'Amico; Ming-Hui Chen; Kimberly A Roehl; William J Catalona
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Short-term results after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anna Wallerstedt; Stavros I Tyritzis; Thordis Thorsteinsdottir; Stefan Carlsson; Johan Stranne; Ove Gustafsson; Jonas Hugosson; Anders Bjartell; Ulrica Wilderäng; N Peter Wiklund; Gunnar Steineck; Eva Haglind
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Prostate MRI and transperineal TRUS/MRI fusion biopsy for prostate cancer detection: clinical practice updates.

Authors:  Eugenio Martorana; Giacomo Maria Pirola; Maria Cristina Aisa; Pietro Scialpi; Aldo Di Blasi; Giovanni Saredi; Alfredo D'Andrea; Stefano Signore; Riccardo Grisanti; Michele Scialpi
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-07-01

2.  Functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance.

Authors:  Marc Zanaty; Khaled Ajib; Kevin Zorn; Assaad El-Hakim
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  The Current State of MR Imaging-targeted Biopsy Techniques for Detection of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Sadhna Verma; Peter L Choyke; Steven C Eberhardt; Aytekin Oto; Clare M Tempany; Baris Turkbey; Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Considering the role of radical prostatectomy in 21st century prostate cancer care.

Authors:  Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Most of patients with localized prostate cancer will be treated in the future? | Opinion: Yes.

Authors:  Paolo Dell'Oglio; Rafael Sanchez-Salas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  The Long-Term Effect of Radical Prostatectomy on Erectile Function, Urinary Continence, and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: A Comparison to Age-Matched Healthy Controls.

Authors:  Badereddin Mohamad Al-Ali; Anton Ponholzer; Herbert Augustin; Stephan Madersbacher; Karl Pummer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-05       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Prostate-specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL: A predictor of degree of upgrading to ≥8 among patients with biopsy Gleason score 6.

Authors:  Glen Denmer R Santok; Ali Abdel Raheem; Lawrence Hc Kim; Kidon Chang; Trenton Gh Lum; Byung Ha Chung; Young Deuk Choi; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-02-15

8.  Difference in Incontinence Pad Use between Patients after Radical Prostatectomy and Cancer-Free Population with Subgroup Analysis for Open vs. Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy: A Descriptive Analysis of Insurance Claims-Based Data.

Authors:  Dong-Ho Mun; Lin Yang; Shahrokh F Shariat; Sylvia Reitter-Pfoertner; Gerald Gredinger; Thomas Waldhoer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  The Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in Men after Radical Prostatectomy Measured with the Insert Test.

Authors:  Dorota Szczygielska; Andrzej Knapik; Teresa Pop; Jerzy Rottermund; Edward Saulicz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.