Literature DB >> 21112609

6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate aerobic biotransformation in activated sludge of waste water treatment plants.

Ning Wang1, Jinxia Liu, Robert C Buck, Stephen H Korzeniowski, Barry W Wolstenholme, Patrick W Folsom, Lisa M Sulecki.   

Abstract

The aerobic biotransformation of 6:2 FTS salt [F(CF2)6CH2CH2SO3- K+] was determined in closed bottles for 90d in diluted activated sludge from three waste water treatment plants (WWTPs) to compare its biotransformation potential with that of 6:2 FTOH [F(CF2)6CH2CH2OH]. The 6:2 FTS biotransformation was relatively slow, with 63.7% remaining at day 90 and all observed transformation products together accounting for 6.3% of the initial 6:2 FTS applied. The overall mass balance (6:2 FTS plus observed transformation products) at day 90 in live and sterile treatments averaged 70% and 94%, respectively. At day 90, the stable transformation products observed were 5:3 acid [F(CF2)5CH2CH2COOH, 0.12%], PFBA [F(CF2)3COOH, 0.14%], PFPeA [F(CF2)4COOH, 1.5%], and PFHxA [F(CF2)5COOH 1.1%]. In addition, 5:2 ketone [F(CF2)5C(O)CH3] and 5:2 sFTOH [F(CF2)5CH(OH)CH3] together accounted for 3.4% at day 90. The yield of all the stable transformation products noted above (2.9%) was 19 times lower than that of 6:2 FTOH in aerobic soil. Thus 6:2 FTS is not likely to be a major source of PFCAs and polyfluorinated acids in WWTPs. 6:2 FTOH, 6:2 FTA [F(CF2)6CH2COOH], and PFHpA [F(CF2)6COOH] were not observed during the 90-d incubation. 6:2 FTS primary biotransformation bypassed 6:2 FTOH to form 6:2 FTUA [F(CF2)5CF=CHCOOH], which was subsequently degraded via pathways similar to 6:2 FTOH biotransformation. A substantial fraction of initially dosed 6:2 FTS (24%) may be irreversibly bound to diluted activated sludge catalyzed by microbial enzymes. The relatively slow 6:2 FTS degradation in activated sludge may be due to microbial aerobic de-sulfonation of 6:2 FTS, required for 6:2 FTS further biotransformation, being a rate-limiting step in microorganisms of activated sludge in WWTPs. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21112609     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  22 in total

1.  Stability of 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate in advanced oxidation processes: degradation kinetics and pathway.

Authors:  Xiaoling Yang; Jun Huang; Kunlun Zhang; Gang Yu; Shubo Deng; Bin Wang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  The impact of two fluoropolymer manufacturing facilities on downstream contamination of a river and drinking water resources with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.

Authors:  Cristina Bach; Xavier Dauchy; Virginie Boiteux; Adeline Colin; Jessica Hemard; Véronique Sagres; Christophe Rosin; Jean-François Munoz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Identification of novel fluorochemicals in aqueous film-forming foams used by the US military.

Authors:  Benjamin J Place; Jennifer A Field
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Temporal and spatial analysis of per and polyfluoroalkyl substances in surface waters of Houston ship channel following a large-scale industrial fire incident.

Authors:  Noor A Aly; Yu-Syuan Luo; Yina Liu; Gaston Casillas; Thomas J McDonald; James M Kaihatu; Mikyoung Jun; Nicholas Ellis; Sarah Gossett; James N Dodds; Erin S Baker; Sharmila Bhandari; Weihsueh A Chiu; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Structure-Specific Aerobic Defluorination of Short-Chain Fluorinated Carboxylic Acids by Activated Sludge Communities.

Authors:  Shun Che; Bosen Jin; Zekun Liu; Yaochun Yu; Jinyong Liu; Yujie Men
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol Lett       Date:  2021-07-26

6.  Biotransformation of AFFF Component 6:2 Fluorotelomer Thioether Amido Sulfonate Generates 6:2 Fluorotelomer Thioether Carboxylate under Sulfate-Reducing Conditions.

Authors:  Shan Yi; Katie C Harding-Marjanovic; Erika F Houtz; Ying Gao; Jennifer E Lawrence; Rita V Nichiporuk; Anthony T Iavarone; Wei-Qin Zhuang; Martin Hansen; Jennifer A Field; David L Sedlak; Lisa Alvarez-Cohen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol Lett       Date:  2018-04-04

Review 7.  Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment.

Authors:  Marina G Evich; Mary J B Davis; James P McCord; Brad Acrey; Jill A Awkerman; Detlef R U Knappe; Andrew B Lindstrom; Thomas F Speth; Caroline Tebes-Stevens; Mark J Strynar; Zhanyun Wang; Eric J Weber; W Matthew Henderson; John W Washington
Journal:  Science       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Perfluoroalkyl Acid Binding with Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors α, γ, and δ, and Fatty Acid Binding Proteins by Equilibrium Dialysis with a Comparison of Methods.

Authors:  Manoochehr Khazaee; Emerson Christie; Weixiao Cheng; Mandy Michalsen; Jennifer Field; Carla Ng
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-02-26

9.  Removal of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances from aqueous media using synthesized silver nanocomposite-activated carbons.

Authors:  Patricia N Omo-Okoro; Christopher J Curtis; Ana Miralles Marco; Lisa Melymuk; Jonathan O Okonkwo
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 10.  Remediation of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contaminated soils - To mobilize or to immobilize or to degrade?

Authors:  Nanthi Bolan; Binoy Sarkar; Yubo Yan; Qiao Li; Hasintha Wijesekara; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Daniel C W Tsang; Marina Schauerte; Julian Bosch; Hendrik Noll; Yong Sik Ok; Kirk Scheckel; Jurate Kumpiene; Kapish Gobindlal; Melanie Kah; Jonathan Sperry; M B Kirkham; Hailong Wang; Yiu Fai Tsang; Deyi Hou; Jörg Rinklebe
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 10.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.