Literature DB >> 21112430

The effect of neck pain on cervical kinematics, as assessed in a virtual environment.

Hilla Sarig Bahat1, Patrice L Weiss, Yocheved Laufer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare cervical kinematics during functional motion in patients with neck pain and in asymptomatic participants using a novel virtual reality assessment.
DESIGN: Clinical comparative trial.
SETTING: Participants were recruited from university staff and students, and from a local physical therapy clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with chronic neck pain (n=25) and asymptomatic participants (n=42).
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Kinematic measures (response time, peak and mean velocity, number of velocity peaks, time to peak velocity percentage) were sampled while participants were engaged in the virtual game. Group and motion direction differences were assessed with a 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance, Tukey-Kramer testing, and contrast analysis when relevant.
RESULTS: Participants with neck pain had lower peak and mean velocities than the asymptomatic participants (P<.0001). They also demonstrated a greater number of velocity peaks, indicating impaired motion smoothness (P=.0036). No significant group differences were found for response time or for time to peak velocity percentage. Cervical rotations were significantly faster and smoother than flexion and extension movements (P<.05). The overall impairment percentage in velocity and smoothness of cervical motion in patients with neck pain ranged from 22% to 44% compared with asymptomatic participants.
CONCLUSIONS: Velocity and smoothness of cervical motion were more restricted in patients with chronic neck pain than found previously. Unlike range of motion and other static measurements, these dynamic variables reflect functional cervical motion and therefore contribute to a better understanding of the impairment associated with neck pain. Because the ability to move quickly in response to external stimuli is a commonly occurring phenomenon, this deficit is highly relevant to clinical assessment and management.
Copyright © 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21112430     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  21 in total

1.  A novel use of inertial sensors to measure the craniocervical flexion range of motion associated to the craniocervical flexion test: an observational study.

Authors:  Tomás Pérez-Fernández; Susan Armijo-Olivo; Sonia Liébana; Pablo José de la Torre Ortíz; Josué Fernández-Carnero; Rafael Raya; Aitor Martín-Pintado-Zugasti
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.262

2.  Instantaneous helical axis methodology to identify aberrant neck motion.

Authors:  Arin M Ellingson; Vishal Yelisetti; Craig A Schulz; Gert Bronfort; Joseph Downing; Daniel F Keefe; David J Nuckley
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Remote kinematic training for patients with chronic neck pain: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Hilla Sarig Bahat; Kate Croft; Courtney Carter; Anna Hoddinott; Elliot Sprecher; Julia Treleaven
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Neck motion kinematics: an inter-tester reliability study using an interactive neck VR assessment in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Hilla Sarig Bahat; Elliot Sprecher; Itamar Sela; Julia Treleaven
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Novel assessment of the variation in cervical inter-vertebral motor control in a healthy pain-free population.

Authors:  René Lindstrøm; Alexander Breen; Ning Qu; Alister du Rose; Victoria Blogg Andersen; Alan Breen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Evidence for a general stiffening motor control pattern in neck pain: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Ingebrigt Meisingset; Astrid Woodhouse; Ann-Katrin Stensdotter; Øyvind Stavdahl; Håvard Lorås; Sigmund Gismervik; Hege Andresen; Kristian Austreim; Ottar Vasseljen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Cervical Spine Assessment Using Passive and Active Mobilization Recorded Through an Optical Motion Capture.

Authors:  Alejandro J Moreno; Gonzalo Utrilla; Javier Marin; Jose J Marin; Maria B Sanchez-Valverde; Ana C Royo
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2018-09-15

8.  Kinematic measures during a clinical diagnostic technique for human neck disorder: inter- and intraexaminer comparisons.

Authors:  Joseph Vorro; Tamara R Bush; Brad Rutledge; Mingfei Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Specific exercise training for reducing neck and shoulder pain among military helicopter pilots and crew members: a randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Mike Murray; Britt Lange; Bo Riebeling Nørnberg; Karen Søgaard; Gisela Sjøgaard
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Muscle activity and head kinematics in unconstrained movements in subjects with chronic neck pain; cervical motor dysfunction or low exertion motor output?

Authors:  Harald Vikne; Eva Sigrid Bakke; Knut Liestøl; Stian R Engen; Nina Vøllestad
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.