Literature DB >> 21111458

Renal tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation: preliminary results in a porcine model.

Ajita Deodhar1, Sébastien Monette, Gordon W Single, William C Hamilton, Raymond Thornton, Majid Maybody, Jonathan A Coleman, Stephen B Solomon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the histopathologic and computed tomography imaging features associated with irreversible electroporation (IRE) ablation performed in normal porcine kidneys. IRE is a nonthermal ablative tool that uses direct electrical pulses to create permanent "pores" in cell membranes and cell death. It does not affect the extracellular matrix.
METHODS: Fifteen female swine were treated with IRE using acute (<24 hours), subacute (36 hours), and chronic (3 weeks) treatment settings. Unipolar IRE applicators were placed under CT guidance. The renal pelvis/calyx was included in 18 ablations. Imaging and histopathologic follow-up were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 29 ablations (19 acute, 4 subacute, and 6 chronic) were created. Acute/subacute ablations showed complete cortical necrosis without intervening live cells. The pelvic epithelium was necrotic with urothelial sloughing; pelvic extracellular matrix was intact. Chronic ablations showed cortical fibrosis, regenerating renal pelvic epithelium and intact pelvic extracellular matrix. No thermal injury, renal pelvic, or blood vessel injury was seen. Immediate postprocedure CT imaging demonstrated a hypodense nonenhancing lesion that persisted at 1 week. Of the 6 chronic lesions, 4 showed complete resolution at 3 weeks on imaging. No collecting system damage was seen.
CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary porcine study demonstrates the nonthermal and connective tissue sparing mechanism of action of IRE. These features may protect against collecting system damage after IRE ablation of renal tissue. IRE could therefore play an important role in ablation of centrally located renal tumors.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21111458     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.08.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  26 in total

Review 1.  Update on thermal ablation of renal cell carcinoma: oncologic control, technique comparison, renal function preservation, and new modalities.

Authors:  Ronald J Zagoria; David D Childs
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Irreversible electroporation: treatment effect is susceptible to local environment and tissue properties.

Authors:  Eliel Ben-David; Muneeb Ahmed; Mohammad Faroja; Marwan Moussa; Ayelet Wandel; Jacob Sosna; Liat Appelbaum; Isaac Nissenbaum; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Renal ablation update.

Authors:  Vishal Khiatani; Robert G Dixon
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  [Irreversible electroporation - a new kid on the block?].

Authors:  O Kosiek; K Strach; J Ricke; M Pech
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Preliminary results in unresectable cholangiocarcinoma treated by CT percutaneous irreversible electroporation: feasibility, safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Maria Paola Belfiore; Alfonso Reginelli; Nicola Maggialetti; Mattia Carbone; Sabrina Giovine; Antonella Laporta; Fabrizio Urraro; Valerio Nardone; Roberta Grassi; Salvatore Cappabianca; Luca Brunese
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Acute and subacute effects of irreversible electroporation on nerves: experimental study in a pig model.

Authors:  Helmut Schoellnast; Sebastien Monette; Paula C Ezell; Ajita Deodhar; Majid Maybody; Joseph P Erinjeri; Michael D Stubblefield; Gordon W Single; William C Hamilton; Stephen B Solomon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Adverse effects of irreversible electroporation of malignant liver tumors under CT fluoroscopic guidance: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Marco Dollinger; Lukas Philipp Beyer; Michael Haimerl; Christoph Niessen; Ernst Michael Jung; Florian Zeman; Christian Stroszczynski; Philipp Wiggermann
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.630

8.  A Comparative Study of Ablation Boundary Sharpness After Percutaneous Radiofrequency, Cryo-, Microwave, and Irreversible Electroporation Ablation in Normal Swine Liver and Kidneys.

Authors:  Francois H Cornelis; Jeremy C Durack; Simon Y Kimm; Thomas Wimmer; Jonathan A Coleman; Stephen B Solomon; Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Feasibility of catheter-directed intraluminal irreversible electroporation of porcine ureter and acute outcomes in response to increasing energy delivery.

Authors:  Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli; Mikhail Silk; Thomas Wimmer; Sebastien Monette; Simon Kimm; Majid Maybody; Stephen B Solomon; Jonathan Coleman; Jeremy C Durack
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 10.  Ablative therapies for small renal tumours.

Authors:  Arturo Castro; Lawrence C Jenkins; Nelson Salas; Gideon Lorber; Raymond J Leveillee
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.