PURPOSE: A common problem in diagnostic research is that the reference standard has not been carried out in all patients. This partial verification may lead to biased accuracy measures of the test under study. The authors studied the performance of multiple imputation and the conventional correction method proposed by Begg and Greenes under a range of different situations of partial verification. METHODS: In a series of simulations, using a previously published deep venous thrombosis data set (n = 1292), the authors set the outcome of the reference standard to missing based on various underlying mechanisms and by varying the total number of missing values. They then compared the performance of the different correction methods. RESULTS: The results of the study show that when the mechanism of missing reference data is known, accuracy measures can easily be correctly adjusted using either the Begg and Greenes method, or multiple imputation. In situations where the mechanism of missing reference data is complex or unknown, we recommend using multiple imputation methods to correct. CONCLUSIONS: These methods can easily apply for both continuous and categorical variables, are readily available in statistical software and give reliable estimates of the missing reference data.
PURPOSE: A common problem in diagnostic research is that the reference standard has not been carried out in all patients. This partial verification may lead to biased accuracy measures of the test under study. The authors studied the performance of multiple imputation and the conventional correction method proposed by Begg and Greenes under a range of different situations of partial verification. METHODS: In a series of simulations, using a previously published deep venous thrombosis data set (n = 1292), the authors set the outcome of the reference standard to missing based on various underlying mechanisms and by varying the total number of missing values. They then compared the performance of the different correction methods. RESULTS: The results of the study show that when the mechanism of missing reference data is known, accuracy measures can easily be correctly adjusted using either the Begg and Greenes method, or multiple imputation. In situations where the mechanism of missing reference data is complex or unknown, we recommend using multiple imputation methods to correct. CONCLUSIONS: These methods can easily apply for both continuous and categorical variables, are readily available in statistical software and give reliable estimates of the missing reference data.
Authors: Nicole Verbiest-van Gurp; Steven B Uittenbogaart; Wim A M Lucassen; Petra M G Erkens; J André Knottnerus; Bjorn Winkens; Henri E J H Stoffers; Henk C P M van Weert Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-06-29 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Willemijn Anna De Ridder; Robbert Maarten Wouters; Lisa Hoogendam; Guus Maarten Vermeulen; Harm Pieter Slijper; Ruud Willem Selles Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Paula S Koekkoek; Jolien Janssen; Minke Kooistra; Esther van den Berg; L Jaap Kappelle; Geert Jan Biessels; Guy Ehm Rutten Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2015-06-09
Authors: Christiana A Naaktgeboren; Joris A H de Groot; Anne W S Rutjes; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; Karel G M Moons Journal: BMJ Date: 2016-02-09
Authors: Chris Stinton; Hannah Fraser; Julia Geppert; Rebecca Johnson; Martin Connock; Samantha Johnson; Aileen Clarke; Sian Taylor-Phillips Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Evelien E S van Riet; Arno W Hoes; Alexander Limburg; Marcel A J Landman; Hans Kemperman; Frans H Rutten Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-02-15 Impact factor: 2.692