Literature DB >> 21109387

A comparison of 2 drilling techniques on the femoral tunnel for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Chealon D Miller1, Andrew C Gerdeman, Joseph M Hart, Chase G Bennett, S Raymond Golish, Christopher Gaskin, Mark D Miller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This cadaveric study was undertaken to characterize the femoral tunnel geometry resulting from commonly used drilling techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
METHODS: We randomized 10 matched-pair cadaveric knees (20 knees) into 2 groups with right and left matched pairs from each cadaver. Of the knees, 10 underwent transtibial femoral tunnel drilling from a far-medial starting point on the tibia (group 1) and 10 had the femoral tunnel drilled from a medial arthroscopic portal (group 2). The dimensions and size of the apertures, the volume and length of the tunnels, and the distance of the tunnels from the posterior wall and articular surface were measured by computed tomography.
RESULTS: The mean femoral tunnel length was 29.7 mm in group 1 and 15.7 mm in group 2. The mean volume for each tunnel was 2,401 mm(3) in group 1 and 2,071 mm(3) in group 2. The intra-articular aperture area was 94.6 mm(2) in group 1 and 98.6 mm(2) in group 2. In group 2 the intra-articular shape was more elliptical than in group 1, with the long axis averaging 13.5 ± 1.3 mm (P = .004) and short axis averaging 9.7 ± 1.0 mm (P = .002); in group 2 the long axis averaged 12.5 ± 1.7 and short axis averaged 10.3 ± 0.7 (P = .002). Group 2 was closer to the posterior wall and articular surface (6.9 ± 0.6 mm and 9.4 ± 0.6 mm, respectively) than group 1 (10.8 ± 1.0 mm and 11.8 ± 1.9 mm, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: We determined the length and volume of the femoral tunnel to be shorter and smaller, respectively, with a medial arthroscopic portal. In addition, the aperture shape was more of an ellipse with a medial arthroscopic portal. The medial arthroscopic portal also created a femoral tunnel that was closer to the posterior wall and articular surface of the femur. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Improved characterization of osseous tunnels with 3-dimensional figures will allow for improved matching of graft and incorporation.
Copyright © 2011 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21109387     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of femoral graft bending angle and tunnel length between transtibial technique and transportal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Joon Ho Wang; Jae Gyoon Kim; Do Kyung Lee; Hong Chul Lim; Jin Hwan Ahn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Effect of ACL reconstruction tunnels on stress in the distal femur.

Authors:  P Smolinski; M O'Farrell; K Bell; L Gilbertson; F H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Finite element study on the anatomic transtibial technique for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Ji Yong Bae; Geon-Hee Kim; Jong Keun Seon; Insu Jeon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Determinants of Femoral Tunnel Length in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: CT Analysis of the Influence of Tunnel Orientation on the Length.

Authors:  Geethan Iyyampillai; Easwar Thirunellai Raman; David Vaithyalingam Rajan; Ajith Krishnamoorthy; Santhosh Sahanand
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-29

5.  ACL reconstruction: comparison between transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques.

Authors:  Alcindo Silva; Ricardo Sampaio; Elisabete Pinto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Optimal entry position on the lateral femoral surface for outside-in drilling technique to restore the anatomical footprint of anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Hirokazu Matsubara; Ken Okazaki; Kanji Osaki; Yasutaka Tashiro; Hideki Mizu-Uchi; Satoshi Hamai; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Far anteromedial portal technique for posterolateral femoral tunnel drilling in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Atsuo Nakamae; Mitsuo Ochi; Nobuo Adachi; Masataka Deie; Tomoyuki Nakasa; Goki Kamei; Atsushi Okuhara; Takuya Niimoto; Shingo Ohkawa
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Comparisons of tunnel-graft angle and tunnel length and position between transtibial and transportal techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Eun-Kyoo Song; Sung-Kyu Kim; Hong-An Lim; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket drilling with a retrograde reamer: lessons from the learning curve.

Authors:  Victor Ferraz; Paul Westerberg; Jefferson C Brand
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2013-10-07

10.  In Vivo Analysis of Dynamic Graft Bending Angle in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knees During Downward Running and Level Walking: Comparison of Flexible and Rigid Drills for Transportal Technique.

Authors:  Yasutaka Tashiro; Vani Sundaram; Eric Thorhauer; Tom Gale; William Anderst; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Scott Tashman
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.772

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.