Literature DB >> 21109343

Defining morbidity of robot-assisted radical cystectomy using a standardized reporting methodology.

Matthew H Hayn1, Nicholas J Hellenthal, Abid Hussain, Andrew P Stegemann, Khurshid A Guru.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adverse event reporting is highly variable and nonstandardized in urologic literature, especially for robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC).
OBJECTIVE: We sought to better characterize complications in patients after RARC using a standardized reporting methodology. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using a prospectively maintained, single-institution database, we identified 156 consecutive patients who underwent RARC with at least 90 d of follow-up. Complications were analyzed and graded according to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) system and were defined and stratified by organ system. MEASUREMENTS: Logistic regression models were used to define predictors of complications. Cox proportional hazard modeling and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to correlate complications and 90-d mortality. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Fifty-two percent (81 of 156) of patients experienced a complication within 90 d of surgery. Sixty-five percent (102 of 156) of patients experienced a postoperative complication at a median follow-up of 9 mo. The highest grade of complication was grade 1 in 30 patients (19%), grade 2 in 34 patients (22%), and grade 3-5 in 38 patients (24%). Twenty-one percent (33 of 156) of patients required hospital readmission. Gastrointestinal, infectious, and genitourinary complications were most common (31%, 25%, and 13%, respectively). The 90-d mortality rate was 5.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: When reported using strict guidelines, surgical morbidity after RARC is significant, but the majority of complications are low grade. Despite the high prevalence of low-grade complications, the mortality rate was acceptably low. Stringent reporting of complications after RARC is essential for counseling patients, assessing surgical quality, and allowing comparisons with open radical cystectomy and among institutions. Copyright Â
© 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21109343     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  18 in total

Review 1.  Complications associated with urinary diversion.

Authors:  Richard E Hautmann; Stefan H Hautmann; Oliver Hautmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  [Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: do we actually need a robot?].

Authors:  G Niegisch; P Albers; R Rabenalt
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Status of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy (RARC) in 2012.

Authors:  Amrith R Rao; Andrew P Stegemann; Shabnam Rehman; Michael A Poch; Dawn Green; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-02-16

4.  Experience of surgeon, hospital, and comprehensive cancer team critical to the outcomes of radical cystectomy and urinary diversion.

Authors:  Ram Anil Pathak; Ashok Kumar Hemal
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-07

Review 5.  Current status of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Faris Azzouni
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  [Robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Pilot study for the prospective evaluation of perioperative parameters compared to open radical cystectomy].

Authors:  G Niegisch; R Rabenalt; P Albers
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Complications of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Their Management.

Authors:  Joshua R Kaplan; Ziho Lee; Daniel D Eun; Adam C Reese
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  Current Status of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy and Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion.

Authors:  Raj Kurpad; Michael Woods; Raj Pruthi
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Getting out of a tight spot: an overview of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures.

Authors:  Niyati Lobo; Sophie Dupré; Arun Sahai; Ramesh Thurairaja; Muhammad Shamim Khan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 10.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis, cumulative analysis, and systematic review.

Authors:  Karthik Tanneru; Seyed Behzad Jazayeri; Jatinder Kumar; Muhammad Umar Alam; Daniel Norez; Sabine Nguyen; Soroush Bazargani; Hariharan Palayapalayam Ganapathi; Mark Bandyk; Robert Marino; Shahriar Koochekpour; Shiva Gautam; K C Balaji; Joseph Costa
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-11-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.