Literature DB >> 2110797

Distortion product emissions in humans. I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects.

B L Lonsbury-Martin, F P Harris, B B Stagner, M D Hawkins, G K Martin.   

Abstract

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPEs) at the 2f1-f2 frequency were recorded from 44 normal ears in response to equilevel primary tones. Detailed testing included the recording of DPE "audiograms" in 100-Hz steps from 1 to 8 kHz at three primary-tone levels (65, 75, and 85 dB sound pressure level [SPL]). In addition, response-growth or input-output (I/O) functions depicting the relationship of the amplitudes of DPEs to primary-tone levels, ranging from 25 to 85 dB SPL in 5-dB steps, were also tested for 11 frequencies distributed at quarter-octave intervals over the identical frequency range. The average DPE "audiogram" illustrating the frequency response of these emissions demonstrated a bilobed contour having a low-frequency maximum at approximately 1.5 kHz and a high-frequency peak that plateaued at about 5.5 kHz. The two maximum regions were separated by a minimum around 2.5 kHz. Depending on the frequency region, the average I/O functions exhibited detection "thresholds" at 3 dB above the noise floor at primary levels between 35 and 45 dB sound pressure level. The dynamic range of the emitted response between detection "threshold" and maximum amplitude varied over a 40-dB extent of the stimulus-level dimension. Approximately one third of the ears exhibited irregular DPE "audiograms" in which emitted responses were significantly reduced in restricted regions tested by low, medium, or high frequencies. When the 44 ears were separated into two groups representing more-normal and less-normal responses, the irregular "normal" ears demonstrated increased variability, especially in high-frequency regions. Mean age did not explain the differences noted between the two types of normally hearing subjects. However, across ears, DPE amplitudes and "thresholds" for the highest frequencies tested were correlated significantly with age in that the oldest individuals showed higher "thresholds" and lower amplitudes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2110797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl        ISSN: 0096-8056


  25 in total

1.  Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: I. test performance.

Authors:  Sienna R Burke; Abigail R Rogers; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Measuring of distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multiple tone pairs.

Authors:  Ioannis Kastanioudakis; Nausica Ziavra; Dimitrios Anastasopoulos; Antonios Skevas
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Effects of whole body vibration on outer hair cells' hearing response to distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Seyyed-Ali Moussavi-Najarkola; Ali Khavanin; Ramazan Mirzaei; Mojdeh Salehnia; Mehdi Akbari
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.416

4.  Evaluation of hearing loss after spinal anesthesia with otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Erkan Karatas; Sitki Göksu; Cengiz Durucu; Yasemin Isik; Muzaffer Kanlikama
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Estimating the operating point of the cochlear transducer using low-frequency biased distortion products.

Authors:  Daniel J Brown; Jared J Hartsock; Ruth M Gill; Hillary E Fitzgerald; Alec N Salt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comparison of compound action potential audiograms with distortion product otoacoustic emissions in experimentally induced hydrops.

Authors:  K C Horner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Characterization of hearing loss in aged type II diabetics.

Authors:  Susan T Frisina; Frances Mapes; SungHee Kim; D Robert Frisina; Robert D Frisina
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Changes in the DP-gram during the preterm and early postnatal period.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Sandra I Oba; Rangasamy Ramanathan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing ears and in ears with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  R Hauser; R Probst; E Löhle
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.