Literature DB >> 21107658

Response of human alveolar bone-derived cells to a novel poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene)/barium titanate membrane.

L N Teixeira1, G E Crippa, R Gimenes, M A Zaghete, P T de Oliveira, A L Rosa, M M Beloti.   

Abstract

This study investigated the response of human alveolar bone-derived cells to a novel poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene)/barium titanate (P(VDF-TrFE)/BT) membrane. Osteoblastic cells were cultured in osteogenic conditions either on P(VDF-TrFE)/BT or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) for up to 14 days. At 7 and 14 days, the mRNA expression of Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), Type I collagen (COL I), Osteopontin (OPN), Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), Bone sialoprotein (BSP), and Osteocalcin (OC), key markers of the osteoblastic phenotype, and of Bcl2-associated X protein (Bax), B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), and Survivin (SUR), associated with the control of the apoptotic cell death, was assayed by real-time PCR. In situ ALP activity was qualitatively evaluated by means of Fast red staining. Surface characterization was also qualitatively and quantitatively assayed in terms of topography, roughness, and wettability. Cells grown on P(VDF-TrFE)/BT exhibited a significantly higher mRNA expression for all markers compared to the ones on PTFE, except for Bcl-2, which was not detected for both groups. Additionally, Fast red staining was noticeably stronger in cultures on P(VDF-TrFE)/BT at 7 and 14 days. At micron- and submicron scale, SEM images and roughness analysis revealed that PTFE and P(VDF-TrFE)/BT exhibited a smooth topography and a similar roughness, respectively. PTFE membrane displayed higher contact angles compared with P(VDF-TrFE)/BT, as indicated by wettability assay. The novel P(VDF-TrFE)/BT membrane supports the acquisition of the osteoblastic phenotype in vitro, while up-regulating the expression of apoptotic markers. Further in vivo experiments should be carried out to confirm the capacity of P(VDF-TrFE)/BT membrane in promoting bone formation in guided bone regeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21107658     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-010-4189-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  46 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Healing of maxillary and mandibular bone defects using a membrane technique. An experimental study in monkeys.

Authors:  C Dahlin; J Gottlow; A Linde; S Nyman
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg       Date:  1990

3.  Evaluation of guided bone regeneration in rabbit tibia using bioresorbable and non-resorbable membranes.

Authors:  A Piattelli; A Scarano; P Russo; S Matarasso
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Histological morphology of the e-PTFE/tissue interface in humans subjected to guided bone regeneration in conjunction with oral implant treatment.

Authors:  C Dahlin; M Simion; U Nanmark; L Sennerby
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  Inorganic phosphate added exogenously or released from beta-glycerophosphate initiates mineralization of osteoid nodules in vitro.

Authors:  C G Bellows; J N Heersche; J E Aubin
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1992-04

6.  Bad, a heterodimeric partner for Bcl-XL and Bcl-2, displaces Bax and promotes cell death.

Authors:  E Yang; J Zha; J Jockel; L H Boise; C B Thompson; S J Korsmeyer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-01-27       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Influence of substratum surface chemistry/energy and topography on the human fetal osteoblastic cell line hFOB 1.19: Phenotypic and genotypic responses observed in vitro.

Authors:  Xiaomei Liu; Jung Yul Lim; Henry J Donahue; Ravi Dhurjati; Andrea M Mastro; Erwin A Vogler
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Characteristics of newly formed bone during guided bone regeneration: analysis of cbfa-1, osteocalcin, and VEGF expression.

Authors:  Shiho Tanaka; Kenichi Matsuzaka; Daisuke Sato; Takashi Inoue
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Influence of surface wettability on competitive protein adsorption and initial attachment of osteoblasts.

Authors:  Jianhua Wei; Toshio Igarashi; Naoto Okumori; Takayasu Igarashi; Takashi Maetani; Baolin Liu; Masao Yoshinari
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 3.715

Review 10.  Runx2/Cbfa1: a multifunctional regulator of bone formation.

Authors:  J B Lian; G S Stein
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.116

View more
  2 in total

1.  Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride-Trifluorethylene)/barium titanate membrane promotes de novo bone formation and may modulate gene expression in osteoporotic rat model.

Authors:  Priscilla Hakime Scalize; Karina F Bombonato-Prado; Luiz Gustavo de Sousa; Adalberto Luiz Rosa; Marcio Mateus Beloti; Marisa Semprini; Rossano Gimenes; Adriana L G de Almeida; Fabíola Singaretti de Oliveira; Simone Cecilio Hallak Regalo; Selma Siessere
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Lycopene influences osteoblast functional activity and prevents femur bone loss in female rats submitted to an experimental model of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Gustavo Ribeiro Oliveira; Paula Katherine Vargas-Sanchez; Roger Rodrigo Fernandes; Milla Sprone Tavares Ricoldi; Mayara Sgarbi Semeghini; Dimitrius Leonardo Pitol; Luiz Gustavo de Sousa; Selma Siessere; Karina Fittipaldi Bombonato-Prado
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.626

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.