Literature DB >> 17644175

Influence of substratum surface chemistry/energy and topography on the human fetal osteoblastic cell line hFOB 1.19: Phenotypic and genotypic responses observed in vitro.

Xiaomei Liu1, Jung Yul Lim, Henry J Donahue, Ravi Dhurjati, Andrea M Mastro, Erwin A Vogler.   

Abstract

Time-dependent phenotypic response of a model osteoblast cell line (hFOB 1.19, ATCC, and CRL-11372) to substrata with varying surface chemistry and topography is reviewed within the context of extant cell-adhesion theory. Cell-attachment and proliferation kinetics are compared using morphology as a leading indicator of cell phenotype. Expression of (alpha2, alpha3, alpha4, alpha5, alphav, beta1, and beta3) integrins, vinculin, as well as secretion of osteopontin (OP) and type I collagen (Col I) supplement this visual assessment of hFOB growth. It is concluded that significant cell-adhesion events-contact, attachment, spreading, and proliferation-are similar on all surfaces, independent of substratum surface chemistry/energy. However, this sequence of events is significantly delayed and attenuated on hydrophobic (poorly water-wettable) surfaces exhibiting characteristically low-attachment efficiency and long induction periods before cells engage in an exponential-growth phase. Results suggest that a 'time-cell-substratum-compatibility-superposition principle' is at work wherein similar bioadhesive outcomes can be ultimately achieved on all surface types with varying hydrophilicity, but the time required to arrive at this outcome increases with decreasing cell-substratum-compatibility. Genomic and proteomic tools offer unprecedented opportunity to directly measure changes in the cellular machinery that lead to observed cell responses to different materials. But for the purpose of measuring structure-property relationships that can guide biomaterial development, genomic/proteomic tools should be applied early in the adhesion/spreading process before cells have an opportunity to significantly remodel the cell-substratum interface, effectively erasing cause and effect relationships between cell-substratum-compatibility and substratum properties. IMPACT STATEMENT: This review quantifies relationships among cell phenotype, substratum surface chemistry/energy, topography, and cell-substratum contact time for the model osteoblast cell line hFOB 1.19, revealing that genomic/proteomic tools are most useful in the pursuit of understanding cell adhesion if applied early in the adhesion/spreading process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17644175      PMCID: PMC2705827          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  76 in total

1.  Initial attachment of osteoblasts to an optimised HAPEX topography.

Authors:  M J Dalby; M V Kayser; W Bonfield; L Di Silvio
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Tissue engineers build new bone.

Authors:  R F Service
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Focal adhesions and assessment of cytotoxicity.

Authors:  T G van Kooten; C L Klein; M Wagner; C J Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1999-07

4.  Differential response of human osteoblast-like cells to commercially pure (cp) titanium grades 1 and 4.

Authors:  M Ahmad; D Gawronski; J Blum; J Goldberg; G Gronowicz
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1999-07

5.  Thermodynamics of cell adhesion. II. Freely mobile repellers.

Authors:  D C Torney; M Dembo; G I Bell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Integrin expression and osteopontin regulation in human fetal osteoblastic cells mediated by substratum surface characteristics.

Authors:  Jung Yul Lim; Amanda F Taylor; Zhongyong Li; Erwin A Vogler; Henry J Donahue
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

7.  High-resolution morphometric analysis of human osteoblastic cell adhesion on clinically relevant orthopedic alloys.

Authors:  A K Shah; R K Sinha; N J Hickok; R S Tuan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Development and characterization of a conditionally immortalized human fetal osteoblastic cell line.

Authors:  S A Harris; R J Enger; B L Riggs; T C Spelsberg
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Cellular interactions with synthetic polymer surfaces in culture.

Authors:  M J Lydon; T W Minett; B J Tighe
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  In vitro adhesion and biocompatability of osteoblast-like cells to poly(methylmethacrylate) and poly(ethylmethacrylate) bone cements.

Authors:  M J Dalby; L Di Silvio; E J Harper; W Bonfield
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.896

View more
  55 in total

1.  Degradable segmented polyurethane elastomers for bone tissue engineering: effect of polycaprolactone content.

Authors:  Katherine D Kavlock; Kyumin Whang; Scott A Guelcher; Aaron S Goldstein
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.517

2.  Electrical polarization of titanium surfaces for the enhancement of osteoblast differentiation.

Authors:  Rolando A Gittens; Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Robert Rettew; Robert J Butera; Faisal M Alamgir; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.010

3.  Biomimetic micro∕nanostructured functional surfaces for microfluidic and tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  E Stratakis; A Ranella; C Fotakis
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation.

Authors:  Rolando A Gittens; Taylor McLachlan; Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Ye Cai; Simon Berner; Rina Tannenbaum; Zvi Schwartz; Kenneth H Sandhage; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Deposition of TiN films on Co-Cr for improving mechanical properties and biocompatibility using reactive DC sputtering.

Authors:  Vuong-Hung Pham; Se-Won Yook; Eun-Jung Lee; Yuanlong Li; Gyuran Jeon; Jung-Joong Lee; Hyoun-Ee Kim; Young-Hag Koh
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  3D Printing of Personalized Artificial Bone Scaffolds.

Authors:  Shailly H Jariwala; Gregory S Lewis; Zachary J Bushman; James H Adair; Henry J Donahue
Journal:  3D Print Addit Manuf       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.449

7.  Polydopamine-assisted BMP-2 immobilization on titanium surface enhances the osteogenic potential of periodontal ligament stem cells via integrin-mediated cell-matrix adhesion.

Authors:  Jeong Seok Lee; Jeong-Chae Lee; Jung Sun Heo
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 5.782

8.  Plasma-sprayed CaTiSiO5 ceramic coating on Ti-6Al-4V with excellent bonding strength, stability and cellular bioactivity.

Authors:  Chengtie Wu; Yogambha Ramaswamy; Xuanyong Liu; Guocheng Wang; Hala Zreiqat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Surface energy of hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate ceramics driving serum protein adsorption and osteoblast adhesion.

Authors:  E A dos Santos; M Farina; G A Soares; K Anselme
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 10.  Significance of novel bioinorganic anodic aluminum oxide nanoscaffolds for promoting cellular response.

Authors:  Gérrard Eddy Jai Poinern; Robert Shackleton; Shariful Islam Mamun; Derek Fawcett
Journal:  Nanotechnol Sci Appl       Date:  2011-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.