Literature DB >> 16938725

Flat gastric polyps: results of forceps biopsy, endoscopic mucosal resection, and long-term follow-up.

Tibor Szalóki1, Veronika Tóth, László Tiszlavicz, László Czakó.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Histological examination of specimens obtained by forceps biopsy sampling of gastric polyps is of limited accuracy, and their management on this basis is therefore controversial. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the value of forceps biopsy sampling in establishing the correct diagnosis revealed by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). The complication rate of EMR was also determined.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Subjects with gastric polyps of epithelial origin, of at least 0.5 cm in diameter, and not associated with polyposis syndromes, were included in the study. Between 1994 and 2004, 56 gastric polyps in 44 patients (30 F, 14 M, mean age 67 years) met the inclusion criteria. Indigo carmine dye staining and electronic magnification were used in all cases. Following forceps biopsy sampling, 56 EMRs were performed. The histological results of the forceps biopsy and the resected specimens were analyzed.
RESULTS: The initial forceps biopsies identified in situ carcinoma in 3 cases, adenoma with no dysplasia in 19, adenoma with low-grade dysplasia in 2, adenoma with moderate-grade dysplasia in 6, adenoma with high-grade dysplasia in 7, and hyperplastic lesions in 19 cases. The histological examination of the resected polyps revealed in situ carcinoma in 5 cases, carcinoid in 1, gastrointestinal stromal tumor in 1, adenoma with no dysplasia in 14, adenoma with low-grade dysplasia in 3, adenoma with moderate-grade dysplasia in 9, adenoma with high-grade dysplasia in 1, hyperplastic lesions in 21, and no diagnosis in 1 case. Complete agreement between the histological results on the forceps biopsy sample and on the ectomized polyp was seen in only 31 (55.3%) polyps. There were important disagreements in 12 cases. In 14 neoplastic and 1 hyperplastic polyps, the degree of dysplasia seen on histological examination of the forceps biopsy specimens differed from that observed for the resected specimens. Post-mucosectomy bleeding was observed in 3 patients, all of whom were successfully treated endoscopically.
CONCLUSIONS: Forceps biopsy is not sufficiently reliable for the identification of gastric polyps. These lesions should be fully resected by EMR for a final diagnosis and (depending on the lesion size and type) possibly definitive treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16938725     DOI: 10.1080/00365520600615880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  16 in total

1.  Predictors for underestimated pathology in forceps biopsy compared with resection specimen of colorectal neoplasia; focus on surface appearance.

Authors:  Yu Jin Hah; Eun Soo Kim; Yoo Jin Lee; Kyung Sik Park; Kwang Bum Cho; Byoung Kuk Jang; Woo Jin Chung; Jae Seok Hwang; Ilseon Hwang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Risk factors associated with diagnostic discrepancy of gastric indefinite neoplasia: Who need en bloc resection?

Authors:  Ja Jun Goo; Cheol Woong Choi; Dae Hwan Kang; Hyung Wook Kim; Su Bum Park; Mong Cho; Sun Hwi Hwang; Si Hak Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Treatment strategy for gastric non-invasive intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy.

Authors:  Tsutomu Nishida; Shusaku Tsutsui; Motohiko Kato; Takuya Inoue; Shunsuke Yamamoto; Yoshito Hayashi; Tomofumi Akasaka; Takuya Yamada; Shinichiro Shinzaki; Hideki Iijima; Masahiko Tsujii; Tetsuo Takehara
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2011-12-15

4.  Endoscopic management of gastric dysplasia: Cutting edge technology needs a new paradigm.

Authors:  Seong Woo Jeon
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-09-16

5.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric noninvasive neoplasia: a multicenter study by Osaka University ESD Study Group.

Authors:  Motohiko Kato; Tsutomu Nishida; Shusaku Tsutsui; Masato Komori; Tomoki Michida; Katsumi Yamamoto; Naoki Kawai; Shinji Kitamura; Shinichiro Zushi; Akihiro Nishihara; Fumihiko Nakanishi; Kazuo Kinoshita; Takuya Yamada; Hideki Iijima; Masahiko Tsujii; Norio Hayashi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  Risk factors in malignant transformation of gastric epithelial neoplasia categorized by the revised Vienna classification: endoscopic, pathological, and immunophenotypic features.

Authors:  Sung Hoon Jung; Woo Chul Chung; Kang-Moon Lee; Chang Nyol Paik; Ji Han Jung; Min Kyoung Lee; Yun Kyung Lee; In-Sik Chung
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  The risk factors for discrepancy after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric category 3 lesion (low grade dysplasia).

Authors:  Cheol Woong Choi; Hyung Wook Kim; Dong Hoon Shin; Dae Hwan Kang; Yong Mi Hong; Jin Hyun Park; Su Bum Park; Mong Cho; Jung Hee Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Endoscopic ultrasonographic assessment of gastric polyps and endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Brintha K Enestvedt; Vinay Chandrasekhara; Gregory G Ginsberg
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-12

9.  Endoscopic characteristics of gastric adenomas suggesting carcinomatous transformation.

Authors:  Min Kyu Jung; Seong Woo Jeon; Soo Young Park; Chang Min Cho; Won Young Tak; Young Oh Kweon; Sung Kook Kim; Yong Hwan Choi; Han Ik Bae
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Endoscopic mucosal resection in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Anis Ahmadi; Peter Draganov
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.