Literature DB >> 21107245

Relationship of age and refraction to central corneal thickness.

Archna Prasad1, Kristen Fry, Peter S Hersh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To obtain descriptive statistics of central corneal thickness (CCT) in a large population of normal eyes undergoing refractive surgery and study the relationship of 2 variables, age and refraction, with CCT.
SETTING: Cornea and Laser Eye Institute, Hersh Vision Group, Teaneck, NJ.
METHODS: The CCT of 5158 patients was measured using an ultrasound pachymeter. Age and preoperative spherical equivalent were recorded for all patients. The entire population and subgroups stratified to age and spherical equivalent were analyzed.
RESULTS: Mean CCT was 544 μm with an SD of 34 μm and a range of 415-695 μm. CCT did not correlate with either age (r = 0.00645) or refraction (r = 0.00072).
CONCLUSIONS: This study defines the CCT in a large population of patients undergoing refractive surgery. In this population, age and refraction did not affect CCT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21107245     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181fb880c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  22 in total

1.  Genetic association of COL5A1 variants in keratoconus patients suggests a complex connection between corneal thinning and keratoconus.

Authors:  Xiaohui Li; Yelena Bykhovskaya; Ana Laura Caiado Canedo; Talin Haritunians; David Siscovick; Anthony J Aldave; Loretta Szczotka-Flynn; Sudha K Iyengar; Jerome I Rotter; Kent D Taylor; Yaron S Rabinowitz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Age-related differences in corneal epithelial thickness measurements with anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Bong Jun Kim; Ik-Hee Ryu; Sun Woong Kim
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Using the posterior to anterior corneal curvature radii ratio to minimize the risk of a postoperative hyperopic shift after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Raphael Diener; Nicole Eter; Maged Alnawaiseh
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Relationship of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy severity to central corneal thickness.

Authors:  Laura J Kopplin; Katie Przepyszny; Brian Schmotzer; Karen Rudo; Denise C Babineau; Sanjay V Patel; David D Verdier; Ula Jurkunas; Sudha K Iyengar; Jonathan H Lass
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04

5.  Demographic profile and clinical course of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy in Mexican patients.

Authors:  Maximiliano Barrera-Sanchez; Julio C Hernandez-Camarena; Raul E Ruiz-Lozano; Jorge E Valdez-Garcia; Alejandro Rodriguez-Garcia
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy: subjective grading versus objective grading based on the central-to-peripheral thickness ratio.

Authors:  Daniel J Repp; David O Hodge; Keith H Baratz; Jay W McLaren; Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Central corneal thickness and its determinants in a geriatric population: a population-based study.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Payam Nabovati; Mohammadreza Aghamirsalim; Abbasali Yekta; Farhad Rezvan; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 8.  Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: The vicious cycle of Fuchs pathogenesis.

Authors:  Stephan Ong Tone; Viridiana Kocaba; Myriam Böhm; Adam Wylegala; Tomas L White; Ula V Jurkunas
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 21.198

9.  Age-related changes in corneal thickness and endothelial characteristics.

Authors:  Saulius Galgauskas; Dovilė Norvydaitė; Dalia Krasauskaitė; Simona Stech; Rimvydas Stanislovas Ašoklis
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Evaluation of anterior segment parameters and possible influencing factors in normal subjects using a dual Scheimpflug analyzer.

Authors:  Xiaogang Wang; Jing Dong; Qiang Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.