Hassan Hashemi1, Payam Nabovati2, Mohammadreza Aghamirsalim3, Abbasali Yekta4, Farhad Rezvan5, Mehdi Khabazkhoob6. 1. Noor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran. 2. Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 3. Translational Ophthalmology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 4. Department of Optometry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. 5. Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran. 6. Department of Basic Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Khabazkhoob@yahoo.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the distribution of central corneal thickness (CCT) and its determinants in an Iranian geriatric population. METHODS: This population-based study was conducted in 2019 in Tehran, the capital of Iran, using stratified multistage random cluster sampling. The study population was all residents ≥60 years of age. First, preliminary optometric and ocular health examinations were performed including the measurement of uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity, objective and subjective refraction, anterior and posterior segment examination. The study participants then underwent corneal imaging using Pentacam HR. RESULTS: Out of 3791 invitees, 3310 participated in this study (response rate: 87.3%). The mean CCT and apex corneal thicknesses were 528 µ (95% CI: 526-529) and 529 µ (95% CI: 527-530), respectively. The highest and lowest mean corneal thickness was related to the superior (620 µ: 95% CI: 618-622) and the temporal (591 µ: 95% CI: 590-592) paracentral points, respectively. According to the multiple linear regression model, the CCT was significantly inversely related to keratometry readings (K1 and K2) and had a statistically significant direct relationship with intraocular pressure (IOP), corneal eccentricity (ECC), and corneal volume (CV) (all p values <0.05). The CCT was significantly higher in diabetic patients (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: The CCT values in the geriatric Iranian population were lower than the values reported in most previous studies. The CCT is mostly influenced by IOP and corneal parameters (curvature, shape factor, and volume) and is not affected by demographic factors, refractive error, and ocular biometric components.
PURPOSE: To determine the distribution of central corneal thickness (CCT) and its determinants in an Iranian geriatric population. METHODS: This population-based study was conducted in 2019 in Tehran, the capital of Iran, using stratified multistage random cluster sampling. The study population was all residents ≥60 years of age. First, preliminary optometric and ocular health examinations were performed including the measurement of uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity, objective and subjective refraction, anterior and posterior segment examination. The study participants then underwent corneal imaging using Pentacam HR. RESULTS: Out of 3791 invitees, 3310 participated in this study (response rate: 87.3%). The mean CCT and apex corneal thicknesses were 528 µ (95% CI: 526-529) and 529 µ (95% CI: 527-530), respectively. The highest and lowest mean corneal thickness was related to the superior (620 µ: 95% CI: 618-622) and the temporal (591 µ: 95% CI: 590-592) paracentral points, respectively. According to the multiple linear regression model, the CCT was significantly inversely related to keratometry readings (K1 and K2) and had a statistically significant direct relationship with intraocular pressure (IOP), corneal eccentricity (ECC), and corneal volume (CV) (all p values <0.05). The CCT was significantly higher in diabetic patients (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: The CCT values in the geriatric Iranian population were lower than the values reported in most previous studies. The CCT is mostly influenced by IOP and corneal parameters (curvature, shape factor, and volume) and is not affected by demographic factors, refractive error, and ocular biometric components.
Authors: Daniel H W Su; Tien Y Wong; Paul J Foster; Wan-Ting Tay; Seang-Mei Saw; Tin Aung Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-01-18 Impact factor: 5.258